Barack Obama has stated that he wants to be like Reagan, at least in the sense of wanting to be a transformational figure.
But almost certainly he has failed.
Yes, Obama has increased the burden of government spending, raised tax rates, and created more dependency, but there’s nothing particularly special about Obama’s tenure that makes him different from other statist Presidents such as Nixon, Carter, and Bush.
Nor is there any evidence that he has fundamentally changed the attitudes of the American people.
That may sound like a bold – and overly optimistic – assertion, but check out the amazing results from a new poll. According to a survey of 1,000 adults, Reagan would kick the you-know-what out of Obama, winning a hypothetical contest by a staggering 58-42 margin.
By the way, the margin might be even bigger than I’m reporting. As you can see from this press excerpt, all we know is that 58 percent of respondents said they would vote for Reagan. I’m assuming that 42 percent would vote for Obama, but it’s possible there was also a “don’t know” or “other” category, so maybe Obama would be under 40 percent!
…just about everything about the era — from the politics, leaders and safety to the music, TV shows and blockbuster movies — are seen as being better than they are today. In fact, 3 in 4 Americans (74%) thought that our country was better off then and even safer (76%). The same amount (76%) believe that government ran better in the 1980s than it does today. And if a presidential election were held today, 58 percent would vote for Ronald Reagan over Barack Obama. Americans ages 18 to 34 were evenly split, with 51 percent favoring Reagan and 49 percent Obama.
Even young people preferred Reagan over Obama, which is remarkable since they didn’t experience the Reagan years and largely have learned about the Gipper from the media and schools, both of which are very hostile to Reagan.
We shouldn’t be too surprised by these polling results. Just take a look at this amazing infographic, which shows Obama’s horrible record on jobs compared to Reagan and other Presidents. Michael Ramirez makes the same point in this very funny cartoon.
Or look at these powerful charts based on Minneapolis Federal Reserve data, which compare the strong results of Reaganomics with the pathetic results of Obamanomics.
In other words, good policy leads to good outcomes, and good outcomes yield political rewards. That simple lesson has been lost on the weak gaggle of big-government GOPers who followed Reagan.
But our hypothetical polling results show that Americans today are still ready to rally behind a candidate who offers a compelling message of freedom and prosperity. That’s yet another reason why I’m still optimistic about the fight for liberty.
P.S. Here’s some snarky humor comparing the Gipper with Obama. And if you liked the story of what happens when you try socialism in the classroom, you’ll also enjoy this video of Reagan schooling Obama.
P.P.S. If you want to be inspired, click here and here to see two short clips of Reagan in action.
[…] Since today’s topic is Reagan, it’s a good opportunity to share my favorite poll of the past five […]
[…] Since today’s topic is Reagan, it’s a good opportunity to share my favorite poll of the past five […]
[…] Since today’s topic is Reagan, it’s a good opportunity to share my favorite poll of the past five […]
[…] Since today’s topic is Reagan, it’s a good opportunity to share my favorite poll of the past five […]
[…] Since today’s topic is Reagan, it’s a good opportunity to share my favorite poll of the past five […]
[…] Since today’s topic is Reagan, it’s a good opportunity to share my favorite poll of the past five […]
[…] Since today’s topic is Reagan, it’s a good opportunity to share my favorite poll of the past five […]
[…] Since today’s topic is Reagan, it’s a good opportunity to share my favorite poll of the past five […]
[…] Since today’s topic is Reagan, it’s a good opportunity to share my favorite poll of the past five […]
[…] Since today’s topic is Reagan, it’s a good opportunity to share my favorite poll of the past five […]
[…] I view Ronald Reagan as an honorary libertarian, I was very happy back in 2013 to see that he won a landslide victory over Barack Obama in a hypothetical […]
[…] I view Ronald Reagan as an honorary libertarian, I was very happy back in 2013 to see that he won a landslide victory over Barack Obama in a hypothetical […]
[…] P.P.P.P.S. For sentimental reasons, I very much approve of this poll. […]
[…] P.P.P.P.S. For sentimental reasons, I very much approve of this poll. […]
[…] I view Ronald Reagan as an honorary libertarian, I was very happy back in 2013 to see that he won a landslide victory over Barack Obama in a hypothetical […]
[…] I view Ronald Reagan as an honorary libertarian, I was very happy back in 2013 to see that he won a landslide victory over Barack Obama in a hypothetical […]
[…] I view Ronald Reagan as an honorary libertarian, I was very happy back in 2013 to see that he won a landslide victory over Barack Obama in a hypothetical […]
[…] I view Ronald Reagan as an honorary libertarian, I was very happy back in 2013 to see that he won a landslide victory over Barack Obama in a hypothetical […]
[…] I view Ronald Reagan as an honorary libertarian, I was very happy back in 2013 to see that he won a landslide victory over Barack Obama in a hypothetical […]
[…] you ever wondered why, in a hypothetical match-up, the American people would elect Ronald Reagan over Barack Obama in a […]
[…] you ever wondered why, in a hypothetical match-up, the American people would elect Ronald Reagan over Barack Obama in a […]
[…] you ever wondered why, in a hypothetical match-up, the American people would elect Ronald Reagan over Barack Obama in a […]
[…] non-conservative Republicans lost twice to Obama while a hypothetical poll in 2013 showed Reagan would trounce […]
[…] my favorite factoid has been the 2013 poll showing that Reagan would have trounced Obama in a hypothetical […]
[…] my favorite factoid has been the 2013 poll showing that Reagan would have trounced Obama in a hypothetical […]
[…] Which gives me another opportunity to call attention to the best poll of the past eight years. […]
[…] important, I shared some hypothetical polling data back in 2013 which showed that Reagan would have defeated Obama in a […]
[…] important, I shared some hypothetical polling data back in 2013 which showed that Reagan would have defeated Obama in a […]
[…] important, I shared some hypothetical polling data back in 2013 which showed that Reagan would have defeated Obama in a […]
[…] if this hypothetical poll is any indication, that would be the route to electoral […]
[…] I also get some angry responses when I praise Ronald Reagan’s achievements. I’ve even had a few leftists get all agitated simply because I occasionally share a hypothetical poll from 2013 showing that Reagan would beat Obama in a landslide. […]
[…] wonder, when presented with a hypothetical matchup, the American people said they would elect Reagan over Obama in a […]
[…] wonder, when presented with a hypothetical matchup, the American people said they would elect Reagan over Obama in a […]
[…] it’s worth, my preferred candidate isn’t available this election, though the fact that he wins this poll (and also this poll) is yet another sign that the American people still have very sensible […]
[…] you ever wondered why, in a hypothetical match-up, the American people would elect Ronald Reagan over Barack Obama in a […]
[…] my man crush on the Gipper, you also won’t be surprised to learn that this is the most encouraging poll I’ve ever […]
[…] my man crush on the Gipper, you also won’t be surprised to learn that this is the most encouraging poll I’ve ever […]
[…] Since today’s topic is Reagan, it’s a good opportunity to share my favorite poll of the past five […]
[…] the way, here are the best poll numbers I’ve ever […]
[…] Via Dan Mitchell: […]
[…] The Spirit of Reagan Is Still With Us: The Gipper Crushes Obama in Hypothetical Matchup […]
[…] rather than politics. I know, for instance, that one of my favorite posts in 2013 was the one about Reagan crushing Obama in a hypothetical matchup, but that’s obviously not a policy […]
[…] P.P.P.S. Since we’re comparing Presidents, I can’t resist sharing that the polling data showing that people would overwhelmingly vote for Reagan over Obama. […]
[…] as illustrated by this poll showing a hypothetical contest between Reagan and Obama, the American people would welcome the chance to support a candidate who favored small government […]
[…] as illustrated by this poll showing a hypothetical contest between Reagan and Obama, the American people would welcome the chance to support a candidate who favored small government […]
[…] The Spirit of Reagan Is Still With Us: The Gipper Crushes Obama in Hypothetical Matchup […]
American leadership in the world is important, wldnja. However, my point is that when hypotheticals are in play and “even the young would vote for Reagan (despite presumed hostility to him in textbooks and teaching – something I’m completely unaware of given the general favorable public sentiment toward him and every subsequent President’s acknowledgement of him),” I find the election exercise to be of little value. If we want to measure presidents say by their ability to bring the deficit down in the past 60 years, Clinton ranks first, Obama second. If we are in a tither about North Korea, Iran or any host of potential nuclear nut jobs, they know enough to understand that U.S. military technology, prowess and capabilities will squish them like a bug. So, given that our military’s annual expenditures exceed that of China, Russia, Japan, India, England, France and Germany COMBINED, why again are we focused on Reagan v Obama?
I am not, nor ever have been an Obama or Reagan acolyte – the president is elected as one of us. I have respect for everyone who’s held the office regardless of decisions made fitting my view of what should be done. I find exercises like this wistful nostalgia. The U.S. economy and government are the result of years of incremental change playing off the needs of one group v. another, as is the case in pluralistic society. Reagan had some wins and losses in an era when common purpose in Congress could be found. Basically, it’s been 20 years of “up yours” regardless of which party runs it. I have to say that Obama’s presidency faces a considerably more truculent mindset. Consider the Senate majority leader’s comments not long after Obama was inaugurated in 2009. – “Our fist order of business is to get rid of Barack Obama.” Gee how transformative can one be in that environment?
I disagree with Kevin. At a time when the world faces a very real nuclear threat, I have been thinking about how much differently Reagan would have handled these circumstances as I mentioned in my Margaret Thatcher post. It is important to contrast the current presidency with others because it shows just how far the current administration has shifted to the left– and somehow that’s acceptable to about half the voting public. You know the old quote… if we don’t remember history, we’ll relive it…
First of all, who CARES about this? Secondly, the past always SEEMS like a better place and Reagan rode that into office with the ’50s which the popular culture of the 1980s embraced in its imitative form. In both of those decades there was PLENTY that was not safe and ominous. I guess some people have too much time on their hands. You might as well put Washington, Lincoln, the two Roosevelt’s and Clinton in for good measure to figure out who runs home with the mythical presidential wins trophy. . .
Reblogged this on Public Secrets and commented:
Now, if only we could find a necromancer to bring Reagan back…. (Or, for science fiction fans, cloning.) Regardless, his current successor makes me realize how starkly better a president the Gipper was.