Welcome Instapundit readers. Notwithstanding my next-to-last paragraph full of caveats, some people are saying I’m too soft on the Aussies. This previous post should disabuse people of that notion.
====================================================================
The Economist magazine has a couple of good articles about Australia’s increasingly enviable economic status. Here’s a blurb from the first article, which outlines the pro-market reforms that enabled today’s prosperity.
Only a dozen economies are bigger, and only six nations are richer—of which Switzerland alone has even a third as many people. Australia is rich, tranquil and mostly overlooked, yet it has a story to tell. Its current prosperity was far from inevitable. Twenty-five years ago Paul Keating, the country’s treasurer (finance minister), declared that if Australia failed to reform it would become a banana republic. Barely five years later, after a nasty recession, the country began a period of uninterrupted economic expansion matched by no other rich country. It continues to this day. This special report will explain how this has come about and ask whether it can last. …With the popular, politically astute Mr Hawke presiding, and the coruscating, aggressive Mr Keating doing most of the pushing, this Labor government floated the Australian dollar, deregulated the financial system, abolished import quotas and cut tariffs. The reforms were continued by Mr Keating when he took over as prime minister in 1991, and then by the Liberal-led (which in Australia means conservative-led) coalition government of John Howard and his treasurer, Peter Costello, after 1996. …By 2003 the effective rate of protection in manufacturing had fallen from about 35% in the 1970s to 5%. Foreign banks had been allowed to compete. Airlines, shipping and telecoms had been deregulated. The labour market had been largely freed, with centralised wage-fixing replaced by enterprise bargaining. State-owned firms had been privatised. …the double taxation of dividends ended. Corporate and income taxes had both been cut.
This chart (click for a larger image), from Economic Freedom of the World, presents a more rigorous look at this period. It shows how Australia’s economic freedom ranking had dropped to as low at 19 (out of 72 nations measured) and now is up to 8 (out of 114 nations measured). This is akin to moving from the 74th percentile to the 94th percentile.
There is also an accompanying article about Australia’s private Social Security system. Called superannuation, these personal accounts have generated tremendous results.
…most Australian workers, over 8m in total, now have a private nest-egg for their old age. No tax is paid when members withdraw from their fund; they can take all they want as a lump sum, subject to a limit, or buy an annuity. Aussies are now a nation of capitalists. At the same time the state pension system, and therefore the taxpayer, is being progressively relieved of most of the burden of retirement provision, since eligibility for the state pension depends on both assets and income. As supers take over, the provision for old folks’ incomes will be almost entirely based on defined contributions, not defined benefits. So Australia is in the happy position of not having to worry too much about the pension implications of an ageing population… The supers…have created a pool of capital in Australia that might not otherwise have existed. Collectively worth about $1.3 trillion—much the same as GDP—they have made Australia the world’s fourth-largest market for pension savings.
Australia is not exactly Hong Kong. Marginal tax rates are still far too high. The burden of government spending is lower than in the United States, but is still far too onerous. Nonetheless, the Aussies have made impressive strides in reducing the overall size, scope, and level of government interference and intervention. And this has translated into much better economic performance.
This video uses the Economic Freedom of the World index to explain why comprehensive free market reforms (like Australia) generate the best results.
[…] you can see, Australia is doing very well, though the small tax havens like Monaco are world […]
[…] you can see, Australia is doing very well, though the small tax havens like Monaco are world […]
[…] you can see, Australia is doing very well, though the small tax havens like Monaco are world […]
[…] you can see, Australia is doing very well, though the small tax havens like Monaco are world […]
[…] you can see, Australia is doing very well, though the small tax havens like Monaco are world […]
[…] you can see, Australia is doing very well, though the small tax havens like Monaco are world […]
[…] you can see, Australia is doing very well, though the small tax havens like Monaco are world […]
[…] you can see, Australia is doing very well, though the small tax havens like Monaco are world […]
[…] you can see, Australia is doing very well, though the small tax havens like Monaco are world […]
[…] you can see, Australia is doing very well, though the small tax havens like Monaco are world […]
[…] you can see, Australia is doing very well, though the small tax havens like Monaco are world […]
[…] you can see, Australia is doing very well, though the small tax havens like Monaco are world […]
[…] you can see, Australia is doing very well, though the small tax havens like Monaco are world […]
[…] you can see, Australia is doing very well, though the small tax havens like Monaco are world […]
[…] you can see, Australia is doing very well, though the small tax havens like Monaco are world […]
[…] you can see, Australia is doing very well, though the small tax havens like Monaco are world […]
[…] you can see, Australia is doing very well, though the small tax havens like Monaco are world […]
[…] you can see, Australia is doing very well, though the small tax havens like Monaco are world […]
[…] you can see, Australia is doing very well, though the small tax havens like Monaco are world […]
[…] you can see, Australia is doing very well, though the small tax havens like Monaco are world […]
[…] you can see, Australia is doing very well, though the small tax havens like Monaco are world […]
[…] you can see, Australia is doing very well, though the small tax havens like Monaco are world […]
[…] you can see, Australia is doing very well, though the small tax havens like Monaco are world […]
[…] you can see, Australia is doing very well, though the small tax havens like Monaco are world […]
[…] you can see, Australia is doing very well, though the small tax havens like Monaco are world […]
[…] you can see, Australia is doing very well, though the small tax havens like Monaco are world […]
[…] you can see, Australia is doing very well, though the small tax havens like Monaco are world […]
[…] you can see, Australia is doing very well, though the small tax havens like Monaco are world […]
[…] you can see, Australia is doing very well, though the small tax havens like Monaco are world […]
[…] you can see, Australia is doing very well, though the small tax havens like Monaco are world […]
[…] you can see, Australia is doing very well, though the small tax havens like Monaco are world […]
[…] you can see, Australia is doing very well, though the small tax havens like Monaco are world […]
[…] you can see, Australia is doing very well, though the small tax havens like Monaco are world […]
[…] you can see, Australia is doing very well, though the small tax havens like Monaco are world […]
[…] you can see, Australia is doing very well, though the small tax havens like Monaco are world […]
[…] you can see, Australia is doing very well, though the small tax havens like Monaco are world […]
[…] you can see, Australia is doing very well, though the small tax havens like Monaco are world […]
[…] you can see, Australia is doing very well, though the small tax havens like Monaco are world […]
[…] you can see, Australia is doing very well, though the small tax havens like Monaco are world […]
[…] you can see, Australia is doing very well, though the small tax havens like Monaco are world […]
[…] you can see, Australia is doing very well, though the small tax havens like Monaco are world […]
[…] you can see, Australia is doing very well, though the small tax havens like Monaco are world […]
[…] you can see, Australia is doing very well, though the small tax havens like Monaco are world […]
[…] you can see, Australia is doing very well, though the small tax havens like Monaco are world […]
[…] you can see, Australia is doing very well, though the small tax havens like Monaco are world […]
[…] you can see, Australia is doing very well, though the small tax havens like Monaco are world […]
[…] you can see, Australia is doing very well, though the small tax havens like Monaco are world […]
[…] you can see, Australia is doing very well, though the small tax havens like Monaco are world […]
[…] you can see, Australia is doing very well, though the small tax havens like Monaco are world […]
[…] you can see, Australia is doing very well, though the small tax havens like Monaco are world […]
[…] Hong Kong’s score declined, not because Singapore’s score increased), with New Zealand, Australia, and Switzerland rounding out the top […]
[…] you can see, Australia is doing very well, though the small tax havens like Monaco are world […]
[…] there hasn’t been much reform this century. That being said, Australia’s era of liberalization last century is still paying dividends. The country is routinely ranked in the top-10 for economic […]
[…] same is true in other nations. Many of the pro-market reforms in Australia and New Zealand were initiated by Labour […]
[…] tariffs (1.51 percent) according to the WTO. New Zealand (2.04 percent), Peru (2.44 percent), and Australia (2.52 percent) also deserve praise for having very low taxes on […]
[…] jump from 1975-today also is remarkable, as is China’s improvement since it entered the rankings in […]
[…] zero. After all, it was the left-wing parties that started the process of pro-market reforms in Australia and New Zealand. And it was a Social Democrat government in Germany that enacted the […]
[…] zero. After all, it was the left-wing parties that started the process of pro-market reforms in Australia and New Zealand. And it was a Social Democrat government in Germany that enacted the labor-market […]
[…] kind of surprise. It was the left-wing parties that started the process of pro-market reforms in Australia and New Zealand. And it was a Social Democrat government in Germany that enacted the labor-market […]
[…] all, it was the left-wing parties that started the process of pro-market reforms in Australia and New […]
[…] So congratulations also to Singapore, New Zealand, Switzerland, and Australia. […]
[…] place) will motivate the Aussies (10th place) to engage in another wave of reform. Australia has some good polices, such as a private Social Security system, but it would become much more competitive if it lowered […]
[…] place) will motivate the Aussies (10th place) to engage in another wave of reform. Australia has some good polices, such as a private Social Security system, but it would become much more competitive if it lowered […]
[…] place) will motivate the Aussies (10th place) to engage in another wave of reform. Australia has some good polices, such as a private Social Security system, but it would become much more competitive if it lowered […]
[…] jump from 1975-today also is remarkable, as is China’s improvement since it entered the rankings in […]
[…] that we can learn lessons – at least on certain issues – from nations such as Sweden, Australia, Canada, and the […]
[…] As one might predict, Hong Kong once again ranks as the jurisdiction with the most liberty to engage in mutually beneficial exchange, followed by Singapore. Other highly ranked nations include New Zealand, Switzerland, and Australia. […]
[…] As one might predict, Hong Kong once again ranks as the jurisdiction with the most liberty to engage in mutually beneficial exchange, followed by Singapore. Other highly ranked nations include New Zealand, Switzerland, and Australia. […]
[…] asked me the best place to go if America suffered a Greek-style economic collapse. I suggested Australia might be the best option, even if I would be too stubborn to take my own […]
[…] suggested Australia might be the best option, even if I would be too stubborn to take my own […]
[…] I’m a big fan of Australia. Their private Social Security system is a huge success, and I’ve even suggested […]
[…] Since I wrote my dissertation on Australia’s system, I can say with confidence that the author is not exaggerating. It’s a very good role model, for reasons I’ve previously discussed. […]
[…] Since I wrote my dissertation on Australia’s system, I can say with confidence that the author is not exaggerating. It’s a very good role model, for reasons I’ve previously discussed. […]
[…] good policies in Hong Kong and Singapore. And I’ve trumpeted the good policies in Switzerland and Australia, as well as Canada, Chile, and […]
[…] Since I wrote my dissertation on Australia’s system, I can say with confidence that the author is not exaggerating. It’s a very good role model, for reasons I’ve previously discussed. […]
[…] Since I wrote my dissertation on Australia’s system, I can say with confidence that the author is not exaggerating. It’s a very good role model, for reasons I’ve previously discussed. […]
[…] good policies in Hong Kong and Singapore. And I’ve trumpeted the good policies in Switzerland and Australia, as well as Canada, Chile, and […]
[…] On the other hand, I’m mystified why the Aussies are so in the tank for Obama. I thought they were rather sensible, based on their good economic reforms. […]
[…] policies in Hong Kong and Singapore. And I’ve trumpeted the good policies in Switzerland and Australia, as well as Canada, Chile, […]
[…] seem to prefer Switzerland and the Cayman Islands, while middle-class people mostly talk about Australia and Latin America (mainly Costa Rica or […]
[…] seem to prefer Switzerland and the Cayman Islands, while middle-class people mostly talk about Australia and Latin America (mainly Costa Rica or […]
[…] policies in Hong Kong and Singapore. And I’ve trumpeted the good policies in Switzerland and Australia, as well as Canada, Chile, and […]
[…] Let’s start by looking at some numbers from Australia, where workers set aside 9 percent of their income in personal retirement accounts. […]
[…] Rear-drive V-8 cars are not the only thing Australia does better than the U.S. Daniel J. Mitchell of the Cato Institute provides visual evidence of Australia’s answer to our Social Security: Let’s start by looking at some numbers from Australia, where workers set aside 9 percent of their income in personal retirement accounts. […]
[…] does better than the U.S. Daniel J. Mitchell of the Cato Institute provides visual evidence of Australia’s answer to our Social Security: Let’s start by looking at some numbers from Australia, where workers set aside 9 percent of their income in personal retirement accounts. […]
[…] Let’s start by looking at some numbers from Australia, where workers set aside 9 percent of their income in personal retirement accounts. […]
[…] Let’s start by looking at some numbers from Australia, where workers set aside 9 percent of their income in personal retirement accounts. […]
[…] being said, I must acknowledge the possibility that Canada and Australia may prove me wrong. And I will be happy if that’s what happens. Both nations have done a […]
[…] know that personal accounts work. Nations such as Australia, Chile, and Sweden have reaped big benefits by making the […]
[…] I’m especially chagrined that this soft form of fascism is happening in one of my favorite nations. […]
[…] prediction: if the Obmaites are confronted with this information, they will counter it with tales of Australian racial bigotry. Which is rather like saying that you […]
[…] Crikey, Australia’s a Good Role Model Australia is not exactly Hong Kong. Marginal tax rates are still far too high. The burden of government spending is lower than in the United States, but is still far too onerous. Nonetheless, the Aussies have made impressive strides in reducing the overall size, scope, and level of government interference and intervention. And this has translated into much better economic performance. […]
Australia survives because we are China´s mine.
All of the above re. Nanny-Statism. Australia is already well down the road of hyper-regulation of everyday life. Compulsory bicycle helmets, a ban on incandescent lightbulbs (brought in by the previous conservative government as a sop to the eco-nuts), open-air smoking bans, a relentless torrent of government ads on TV telling you what to eat, not to smoke, not to gamble, not to drink, how to pick up heavy objects, etc. etc., local councils claiming the power to tell you what flowers you can and can’t plant in your garden (seriously!) and so on. Forget Crocodile Dundee – in the real Australia he’d be in jail or sentenced to mandatory ‘attitude counselling’.
Kaga & Craig Mc,
The current Australian Federal government has tried it’s darndest to roll-back the reforms of the Hawke and Howard administrations.
Yes, they have done some damage but they are failing badly and are soon destined for the scrap-heap of Australian history.
I live in Perth, Western Australia and work in the mining industry. Its true Australia is doing not too badly because of the mining boom. Our present government though is as bad as America’s for borrowing everything they can and flinging the cash down the toilet. And out of nanny-statism and monocultural political correctness they are determined to destroy the economy with a mining or carbon tax so they can keep the money flowing while gaining moral authority credits.
As to our gun laws, I have some knowledge – the problem is the bureaucrat class create increasing restrictions while the media class create a political impossibility for rational corrections.
The Australian economy isn’t so great unless you are in mining or mining supporting industries. The rest is moribund at present.
I have a terrible feeling that economically the chickens haven’t come home to roost yet (possibly due to the distance) largely because of the non lunatic behaviour of the Howard Costello government before 2007 although there is plenty to criticise there like the “first homeowners grant” which inflated the residential housing bubble which is now beginning to deflate.
Lots of trouble on the horizon with a totally incompetent Federal government thrashing around doing lots of damage with proposed carbon taxes etc which cause business uncertainty. Yes there is far too much nanny statism and PC here too. The previous conservative government was just as bad as the current lunatics in this regard.
I came within a hair of relocating to Sydney earlier in the year but ultimately backed out because of the cost of living difference and the modern American albatross that is my house. They have rental rates that would be the envy of 1998 San Jose or San Fran. We ultimately didn’t make the move for a few reasons, most of them economic, but I can’t say I feel good about the decision. Articles like this remind me of why.
I will note, however, they do have a high dose of nanny-ism.
Also, I think they may be sitting on a ticking time bomb that is their own housing issue. Something like 85% of mortgages are variable rate. A small interest rate bump becomes political crisis number one in the country, followed by full blown political demagoguery about greedy banks, etc.
If they get too overheated, a popping bubble could be even nastier than there since the country is essentially limited to three huge economic zones with a few smaller ones and whole lot of emptiness. In other words, the flight to quality or cheaper confines will be limited.
Here’s hoping it doesn’t happen. And we could certainly learn a few things from our friends down under.
Surely, the best role model for cutting government down to size is Estonia: from part of the Soviet Union to rating pretty close to Australia and the USA in the Economic Freedom of the World index. (And already more free than the UK if you ask me, no matter what the EFW says.)
OTOH if you want a model for how to _keep_ government small, or at least growing as slowly as possible, maybe the Swiss constitution is best.
Kaga: Seconded. It’s obvious why the OP’s list of good governments ends with the Howard/Costello one. The current one stinks.
Sadly, Australia is not immune from big government. Indeed, the government is trying to levy additional large taxes on the mining sector and is planning to introduce a tax on carbon dioxide emissions this year to supposedly save us from global warming.
Also it is spending $43 billion of taxpayer’s money on a broadband internet network (and ensuring that competition will be drastically damaged in the process). Moreover they are continually imposing stupid regulations on business (eg, tobacco companies will soon be forced to sell their products in ‘plain packaging’). They have squandered a large budget surplus on ‘economic stimulus’ and the budget is substantially in deficit.
As your other post on Australia notes, we are suffering from extremely bad government here!
Economic freedom, perhaps, but there is still too much nanny-statism and PC there for my liking. Australian gun control is nearly as draconian as the UK