Back in July, I made the case for the right kind of entitlement reform in a discussion with the folks at Live and Let Live.
Today, I want to underscore why it is important to focus on “the right kind” of reform.
On paper, you can save money with “means testing” of benefits, but that creates an indirect penalty on work, saving, and investment.
You can also, on paper, save money by imposing price controls on health care, but that policy has a long track record of failure.
At the risk of understatement, either of those approaches represents “the wrong kind” of entitlement reform. Indeed, those policies are not really reform. Instead, they are tinkering with systems that are fundamentally broken.
For what it is worth, most politicians do not support good reform or bad reform.
As predicted by “public choice,” their preferred approach is kicking the can down the road.
Which is what Greek politicians did for many years.
But they learned in Greece that ignoring a problem does not make it disappear. Instead, it is a recipe for fiscal crisis (and we will probably have to re-learn that lesson in Italy).
So my other goal today is to show why something needs to be done.
We’ll start with a look at Medicare from Brian Riedl’s chartbook.
That’s a very sobering image, so now I’ll share some very sobering words.
James Capretta of the American Enterprise Institute summarizes America’s grim fiscal future.
In 2001, the Treasury estimated the government’s net unfunded liabilities, in present value terms, at $6.5 trillion, or 61 percent of GDP, with federal debt accounting for $3.3 trillion of the measured obligations. …By 2021, the government’s net position had deteriorated to minus $29.9 trillion, or 128 percent of GDP, with federal debt accounting for $22.3 trillion of the liabilities.
The government’s unfunded commitments beyond public debt had grown by $2.9 trillion over ten years. …The financial hole is actually deeper than these numbers reveal because they exclude the dramatic effects of Social Security and Medicare. …with Social Security and Medicare included in the assessment, the federal government’s unfunded liabilities in 2021 are $93.1 trillion, or nearly 400 percent of annual GDP. That compares with $11.1 trillion as calculated in the 2001 Treasury report, which was 105 percent of GDP. …The problem posed by unfunded public liabilities is a relatively new one in U.S. history. It has only been over the past half century that the combination of an aging population and the modern entitlement system has pushed the federal government toward a financial crisis.
Having shared all this depressing data, I’ll now close with a couple of observations.
- First, doing nothing almost surely guarantees massive future tax increases. Including European-style levies like a value-added tax that will be very bad news for lower- income and middle-class taxpayers.
- Second, “funded liabilities” are hardly an improvement over “unfunded liabilities” since that simply means debt-financed spending becomes tax-financed spending. From the frying pan to the fire, or vice-versa.
As I said in the above video, we need the right kind of entitlement reform so that we save money and have better policy for old people and poor people.
P.S. Entitlements are a ubiquitous problem in developed nations.
[…] a just-released interview with John Stossel, I discuss how the United States faces an entitlement crisis that will result in massive tax increases on poor and middle-class households. Or […]
[…] I’m not surprised that Medicare and Medicaid get so much blame. They deserve it! […]
[…] I’m not surprised that Medicare and Medicaid get so much blame. They deserve it! […]
[…] I’ll close by acknowledging that America’s fiscal challenge is an ever-expanding burden of domestic spending. Especially entitlements. […]
[…] If you don’t want to spend two minutes watching the video, I explained that the burden of government spending is going to dramatically increase over the next several decades because of demographic change and poorly designed entitlement programs. […]
[…] Our fiscal challenge in the United States is excessive government spending. And the problem is projected to worsen in coming decades because of demographic change and poorly designed entitlement programs. […]
[…] If you don’t want to spend two minutes watching the video, I explained that the burden of government spending is going to dramatically increase over the next several decades because of demographic change and poorly designed entitlement programs. […]
[…] And even if Biden and Senate Democrats somehow agree to the spending cap, it only applies to discretionary spending. That’s better than nothing, but entitlements are America’s big fiscal problem. […]
[…] And even if Biden and Senate Democrats somehow agree to the spending cap, it only applies to discretionary spending. That’s better than nothing, but entitlements are America’s big fiscal problem. […]
[…] part, this is automatically happening because of demographic change and poorly designed entitlement programs. But there’s also a major effort by Joe Biden to accelerate America’s fiscal decline […]
[…] But today’s column is a warning sign about what will happen in the United States if Republicans surrenderon spending and entitlement programs are left on autopilot. […]
[…] entitlement spending is exploding and, second, there are not enough rich people to pick up the tab. As such, you can’t finance […]
[…] combination of demographic change and poorly designed entitlement programs is producing an ever-increasing burden of federal […]
[…] But today’s column is a warning sign about what will happen in the United States if Republicans surrenderon spending and entitlement programs are left on autopilot. […]
[…] But today’s column is a warning sign about what will happen in the United States if Republicans surrender on spending and entitlement programs are left on autopilot. […]
[…] I have profound worries about the future of fiscal policy, I wonder if developments in monetary policy are an even greater […]
[…] My biggest economic concern is that the United States, because of population aging and poorly designed entitlement programs, is slowly but surely going to become a European-style welfare state. […]
[…] aging of the population – and the concomitant problem of poorly designed entitlement programs – probably belongs at the top of the […]
[…] embraced huge tax increases by default. He told congressional Republicans to ignore America’s slow-motion crisis of entitlement […]
[…] embraced huge tax increases by default. He told congressional Republicans to ignore America’s slow-motion crisis of entitlement […]
[…] I also realize that we’re on a very bad path (thanks to demographic change and poorly designed entitlement programs), so we need to hope and pray that lawmakers at some point affirmatively take enact reforms to […]
[…] I also realize that we’re on a very bad path (thanks to demographic change and poorly designed entitlement programs), so we need to hope and pray that lawmakers at some point affirmatively take enact reforms to […]
[…] I try to be optimistic (notwithstanding forcesand evidence to the contrary), let’s start with the good […]
[…] I try to be optimistic (notwithstanding forces and evidence to the contrary), let’s start with the good […]
[…] previously explained the difference between entitlement spending and discretionary […]
[…] we have very serious problems (an awful tax system, runaway entitlement spending, the administrative state, etc) that can only be solved by legislative […]
[…] we have very serious problems (an awful tax system, runaway entitlement spending, the administrative state, etc) that can only be solved by legislative […]
[…] Source: America’s Looming Entitlement Crisis | International Liberty […]
[…] America’s Looming Entitlement Crisis — International Liberty […]