The folks at the Fraser Institute in Canada have just released a new version of Economic Freedom of the World.
As has been the case for many years, Hong Kong is #1 and Singapore is #2, followed by New Zealand (#3) and Switzerland (#4).
Interestingly, the United States improved one spot, climbing to #5.
Here’s the data for the top two quartiles.
The new version includes 2017, so fans of Trump will be able to claim vindication.
But not much.
As you can see, the EFW data shows that America’s score rose only slightly, from 8.17 to 8.19.
My view, for what it’s worth, is that Trump’s economic policy is somewhat incoherent.
He’s been good on taxes and red tape, but bad on spending and trade. So I’m not surprised we’re mostly treading water.
Now let’s look at the bottom half of the ranking.
In last place, unsurprisingly, we find Venezuela.
Let’s close with two final visuals.
Here’s a chart showing that poor people in the nations with the most economic liberty have much higher incomes that poor people in countries with less economic liberty.
The moral of the story, needless to say, is that people who genuinely want to help the poor should support free markets and limited government.
Last but not least, here are two tables I prepared.
The one on the left shows the nations with the biggest positive and negative changes since 2010, while the one on the right shows the biggest changes since 2000.
In some cases, such as Zimbabwe, a nation improved because it was in such terrible shape that it would have been difficult to do worse.
Though Venezuela seems determined to show that a terrible score can drop even farther.
For what it’s worth, Egypt’s slide toward statism is being subsidized by massive amounts of aid from American taxpayers.
And speaking of America, I’m embarrassed to acknowledge that the United States has suffered the 10-largest drop when looking at changes since 2000. That’s a legacy of the bad policies we got from George W. Bush and Barack Obama. Thanks for nothing, guys!
[…] worth knowing that Venezuela has the world’s lowest level of economic liberty according to Economic Freedom of the World and second-to-lowest level of economic liberty according to the Index of Economic […]
[…] worth knowing that Venezuela has the world’s lowest level of economic liberty according to Economic Freedom of the World and second-to-lowest level of economic liberty according to the Index of Economic […]
[…] worth knowing that Venezuela has the world’s lowest level of economic liberty according to Economic Freedom of the World and second-to-lowest level of economic liberty according to the Index of Economic […]
[…] The bad news is that Australia jumped in front of the United States, so America is now #6 instead of #5 like last year. […]
[…] you compare the scores the two countries get from the most-recent edition of Economic Freedom of the World, you’ll find that South Korea scores better on […]
[…] do have higher tax burdens and more costly welfare states, which is the main reason they generally rank below the United States in measures of national economic […]
[…] Pero no quiero ser excesivamente pesimista. Estados Unidos no se ha deslizado demasiado por el tobogán del socialismo. De hecho, estamos clasificados como el número 6 en el mundo en cuanto a libertad económica. […]
[…] is terrible (ranked #158 for “size of government” out of 162 nations according to the latest edition of Economic Freedom of the […]
[…] such as Singapore, Hong Kong, New Zealand, and Switzerland – the United States enjoys more economic freedom than other […]
[…] fiscal deterioration under Trudeau, Canada is still a surprisingly pro-market country, ranked #8 in the world. Moreover, it has some very sensible policies involving school choice, welfare […]
[…] America hasn’t slid too far down the socialism slide. Indeed, we’re actually ranked #6 in the world for economic […]
[…] if you look at the data from the most-recent edition of the Fraser Institute’s Economic Freedom of the World, you can see monetary policy […]
[…] a look at the average level of economic liberty for the countries that resisted the bailout compared to the average for the three nations that will […]
[…] the housing will be architecturally significant, but it does indicate that people are better off in countries with smaller government and more economic liberty (indeed, it’s also worth noting that the average poor American enjoys higher overall living […]
[…] at which nations have the best economic policy, the best options are the Fraser Institute’s Economic Freedom of the World and the Heritage Foundation’s Index of Economic […]
[…] The absolute level of economic liberty is the degree to which a nation relies on markets or statism (see, for instance, the Fraser Institute’s Economic Freedom of the World). […]
[…] have applauded the incredible economic success of Hong Kong, which has long been ranked as the world’s most economically free […]
[…] of the puzzle when measuring the extent of free enterprise (which is why there’s far more economic liberty in, say, Denmark compared to every single country in the developing […]
[…] place to start is the Fraser Institute’s Economic Freedom of the World. Based on their comprehensive rankings of economic liberty, Panama gets a 7.66 on a 0-10 scale, which places it at #31 out of 162 […]
[…] has continued to grow. Hopefully, they will realize that pro-market policies in other areas are offsetting the damage of protectionism and therefore be more supportive of […]
[…] a result, China only ranks #113 according to Economic Freedom of the World. Which makes the Chinese tiger a paper […]
[…] in terms of overall economic liberty, the post-2010 policy stalemate under Obama produced similar scores to the zig-zag policy we’re getting under Trump. So we shouldn’t be surprised that the […]
[…] Hong Kong still ranks as the world’s freest economy, though there are increasing worries about whether China will allow economic liberty in the long […]
[…] favorite publication from the Canada-based Fraser Institute is Economic Freedom of the World, which ranks nations based on economic […]
[…] loss of economic liberty in Chile and/or Hong Kong – As shown by Economic Freedom of the World, there are not that many success stories in the world. But we can […]
[…] the country is ranked #21 for economic freedom out of 162 nations in Economic Freedom of the World, with a score of 7.80. […]
[…] there’s far too much intervention, but we have enough private property and free enterprise to be ranked #5 for economic liberty. Which helps to explain why Americans enjoy higher living standards than […]
[…] help people respond to this challenge, here’s a chart, based on the data from Economic Freedom of the World. In that “vast gray expanse” between pure capitalism and pure statism, should policy […]
[…] Africa’s big economic challenge is not bad fiscal policy. If you peruse the data from Economic Freedom of the World, the continent has huge problems with excessive regulation and […]
[…] Actually, that probably overstates the damage. Based on my Lassez-Faire Index, I’m guessing we’d be more akin to Spain or Belgium (in other words, falling from #6 in the rankings to the #35-#40 range according to Economic Freedom of the World). […]
[…] of course. The nation’s economic freedom score – 7.89 on a 0-10 scale – is good enough for a #13 ranking, but there’s still room for […]
[…] Yes, it would be nice if there had been some focus on the size of government, but all of the advice on trade, regulation, monetary policy, and quality of governance was very sound. And those policies account for 80 percent of a nation’s grade according to Economic Freedom of the World. […]
[…] is now ranked #113 by Economic Freedom of the World. That’s definitely not anything to cheer about, but its score of 6.42 is way higher than the […]
[…] to the most-recent edition of Economic Freedom of the World, Brazil is only ranked #120, which is lower than nations such as […]
Agree Ned. There’s so much economic ignorance out there. People put way too much emphasis on relative inequality and ignore the absolute benefits of widespread prosperity. It’s somewhat illogical.
Let’s compare two societies. In society A every person subsists on a meager diet of 2 pounds of rice per day. In society B every person gets at least 2 pounds of rice AND one pound of vegetables. A third of the population also gets to eat some meat.
Sure, society A is a paragon of equality (hooray, Gini of zero!). But who wouldn’t rather live in society B? Isn’t society B better off because at least some people have escaped grinding poverty?
Obviously a hypothetical and simplified example. Yet it reflects the fundamental truths of historical reality. A focus on inequality is somewhat irrational.
It would be interesting to measure the income (earned plus benefits) of the lowest 10% against the Gini index (inequality). I’m sick of hearing that “trickle down” does not work and that equality somehow creates growth.
It would also be interesting to see the Gini index in so called equal societies like Russia, so we can see what equalization socialism brings.
Thanks so much. There’s half the work done toward graphing how the weight of constitutional verbiage correlates with economic happiness. My Alma Mater has a Comparative Constitutions Project in which I am unable to find how many words there are in the various national constitutions. Mexico and Brazil’s weigh about the same as the Dem and GOP platforms combined, or about ten times the verbiage used in the US Constitution.