My view of the U.S. economic policy often depends on whether I’m writing about absolute levels of laissez-faire or relative levels of laissez-faire.
If my column is about the former, I generally complain about excessive spending, punitive taxation, senseless red tape, easy-money monetary policy, and trade protectionism.
But if I’m writing about relative levels of economic liberty, I often turn into a jingoistic, pro-American flag-waver.
That because – with a few exceptions such as Singapore, Hong Kong, New Zealand, and Switzerland – the United States enjoys more economic freedom than other nations.
And because of the relationship between policy and prosperity, this means that Americans tend to have much higher living standards than their counterparts in other nations. Even when compared to people in other developed countries.
(Which is why it’s so disappointing that many American politicians want to make the U.S. more like Europe.)
Let’s examine some data. In a column for National Review, Joseph Sullivan compares recent increases in living standards for major nations.
If you want to answer questions about how economic wellbeing for individuals in a country has evolved, the actual change in the value of real GDP per capita may tell you more than the rate of its change. Why? Individuals buy goods and services with dollars and cents — not the rates of change that economists, politicians, and pundits tend to focus on when it comes to growth. …By this metric, between 2016 and 2019, economic growth in the U.S. was the best in its class. …The U.S. surpasses…its peers…by no small margin. It bests the silver medalist in this category, Finland, by $1,100. That is almost as big as the $1,160 that separates the runner-up from the peer country that comes in dead last, Sweden.
Here’s the chat from his article.
The key takeaway is that Americans started the period with more per-capita GDP and the U.S. lead expanded.
That’s one way of looking at the data.
A 2017 report from the Pew Research Center also has some fascinating numbers about the relative well-being of the middle class in different nations.
…the middle class in a country consists of adults living in households with disposable incomes ranging from two-thirds to double the country’s own median disposable household income (adjusted for household size). This definition allows middle-class incomes to vary across countries, because national incomes vary across countries. …That raises a question: What shares of adults in Western European countries have the same standard of living as the American middle class? …When the Western European countries the Center analyzed are viewed through the lens of middle-class incomes in the U.S., the share of adults who are middle class decreases in most of them. …In most Western European countries studied, applying the U.S. standard shrinks the middle-class share by about 10 percentage points… Applying U.S. incomes as the middle-class standard also boosts the estimated shares of adults who are in the lower-income tier in most Western European countries… Overall, regardless of how middle class fortunes are analyzed, the material standard of living in the U.S. is estimated to be better than in most Western European countries examined.
The main thing to understand is that there’s a big difference between being middle class in a rich country and being middle class in a not-so-rich country.
And if you peruse the chart from the Pew Report, you’ll notice that a lot of middle-class Europeans would be lower-income if they lived in the United States.
And if you looked at the issue from the other perspective, as I did last year, many poor Americans would be middle class if they lived in Europe.
Let’s augment that analysis by looking at a graphic the Economist put together several years ago. It’s based on the OECD’s Better-Life Index, which is a bit dodgy since it includes measures such as the Paris-based bureaucracy’s utterly dishonest definition of poverty.
That being said, notice that the bottom 10 percent of Americans would be middle class (or above!) if they lived in other nations.
I’ll close with the data on Actual Individual Consumption from the OECD, which are the numbers that (I believe) most accurately measure relative living standards between nations (indeed, I shared data from this source in 2010, 2014, and 2017).
As you can see, the United States easily surpasses other industrialized nations, with a score of 145.9 in 2017 (compared to the average of 100).
My final observation is that all this data is contrary to traditional convergence theory, which assumes that poor nations should grow faster than rich nations.
In other words, Europe should be catching up to the United States.
Indeed, that actually happened for a couple of decades after World War II, but then many European nations expanded welfare states in the 1960s and 1970s, while the U.S. for more economic freedom under both Ronald Reagan and Bill Clinton in the 1980s and 1990s.
And since policies diverged, convergence stalled.
The bottom line is that rich nations can consistently out-perform poor nations if they have allow more economic freedom.
P.S. Not only do ordinary Americans have a big edge over their European counterparts, they also enjoy much lower taxes.
[…] being said, the trend lines are very consistent with other data showing faster growth in the United […]
[…] sides of the Atlantic. And it’s even true when you compare living standards of low-income and poor Americans to living standards for average […]
[…] even show his calculations. For what it’s worth, his numbers are not very consistent with some other data sources that are publicly […]
[…] even show his calculations. For what it’s worth, his numbers are not very consistent with some other data sources that are publicly […]
[…] show his calculations. For what it’s worth, his numbers are not very consistent with some other data sources that are publicly […]
[…] course not. Heck, poor people in the United States often have incomes that are equal to or higher than average incomes in other […]
[…] if you want to see more charts to confirm this data, click here, here, here, and […]
[…] if you want to see more charts to confirm this data, click here, here, here, and […]
[…] takeaway is that this research confirms why people with modest incomes in the United States have a better life than their counterparts in […]
[…] And not because Europe reached American levels of prosperity. Even the nations of Western Europe never came close to U.S. levels of per-capita economic […]
[…] people in the United States have income equal (or greater) than middle class people in other developed nations, yet OECD bureaucrats want people […]
[…] This argument is baffling because it doesn’t make sense to copy countries where living standards are significantly lower. […]
[…] Europe’s welfare states, so all we have to do is compare U.S. living standards and economic performance to what’s happening on the other side of the Atlantic […]
[…] Even more remarkably, lower-income people in the United States often have living standards equal to – or even greater than – middle-income […]
[…] bottom 10 percent of Americans enjoy better lives than the average citizens of OECD […]
[…] bottom 10 percent of Americans enjoy better lives than the average citizens of OECD […]
[…] Europe’s welfare states, so all we have to do is compare U.S. living standards and economic performance to what’s happening on the other side of the Atlantic […]
[…] Western Europe’s welfare states, so all we have to do is compare U.S. living standards and economic performance to what’s happening on the other side of the Atlantic […]
[…] are looking for jobs while offering no measurable benefit for those who have jobs (especially if we compare living standards across […]
[…] I always explain that there’s a downside. The economic data clearly show that there’s been less growth in Europe and this has real-world […]
[…] explain that there’s a downside. The economic data clearly show that there’s been less growth in Europe and this has real-world […]
[…] even data showing that very poor Americans (those at the 10th percentile) have living standards equal to most middle-class […]
[…] even data showing that very poor Americans (those at the 10th percentile) have living standards equal to most middle-class […]
[…] The Economist published the results of the OECD’s Better-Life Index which confirmed that the bottom 10 percent of Americans would be middle class or above if they lived in other nations .Yet, you wouldn’t know that by how discontented so many are with life in America. They are so […]
[…] The Economist published the results of the OECD’s Better-Life Index which confirmed that the bottom 10 percent of Americans would be middle class or above if they lived in other nations .Yet, you wouldn’t know that by how discontented so many are with life in America. They are so […]
[…] The Economist published the results of the OECD’s Better-Life Index which confirmed that the bottom 10 percent of Americans would be middle class or above if they lived in other nations .Yet, you wouldn’t know that by how discontented so many are with life in America. They are so […]
[…] The Economist published the results of the OECD’s Better-Life Index which confirmed that the bottom 10 percent of Americans would be middle class or above if they lived in other nations .Yet, you wouldn’t know that by how discontented so many are with life in America. They are so […]
[…] of data showing what that means for our future. Unfortunately, it means Americans will enjoy less income and suffer from lower living […]
[…] we have lots of data showing what that means for our future. Unfortunately, it means Americans will enjoy less income and suffer from lower living […]
[…] is the fact that lower-income people in the United States generally enjoy living standards that are equal to or even higher than those for middle-class people in most European […]
[…] is the fact that lower-income people in the United States generally enjoy living standards that are equal to or even higher than those for middle-class people in most European […]
[…] what’s even more shocking is that a poor person in the United States would be middle class in most European […]
[…] what’s even more shocking is that a poor person in the United States would be middle class in most European […]
[…] bottom line is that living standards in the United States are significantly higher than living standards in Europe, in large part because fiscal burdens are not as onerous in […]
[…] By the way, if Ms. Diallo is actually interested in “the well-being of the population,” I wonder what she thinks of the OECD data that shows that people in the bottom 10 percent in the United States are better off than the average middle class person in France? […]
[…] Dan Mitchell has dismantled this argument repeatedly on his blog, including posts comparing Europe generally and France specifically. One of his most compelling points is “the OECD data that shows that […]
[…] cite at least one person who could have pointed out that low-income people in the United States enjoy higher living standards than middle class people in nations with bigger welfare […]
[…] cite at least one person who could have pointed out that low-income people in the United States enjoy higher living standardsthan middle class people in nations with bigger welfare […]
[…] cite at least one person who could have pointed out that low-income people in the United States enjoy higher living standards than middle class people in nations with bigger welfare […]
[…] By the way, if Ms. Diallo is actually interested in “the well-being of the population,” I wonder what she thinks of the OECD data that shows that people in the bottom 10 percent in the United States are better off than the average middle class person in France? […]
[…] bottom line is that living standards in the United States are significantly higher than living standards in Europe, in large part because fiscal burdens are not as onerous in […]
[…] bottom line is that living standards in the United States are significantly higher than living standards in Europe, in large part because fiscal burdens are not as onerous in […]
[…] if higher taxes and more spending are somehow beneficial, why is the United States so much more prosperous than the nations that do have higher taxes and more […]
[…] if higher taxes and more spending are somehow beneficial, why is the United States so much more prosperous than the nations that do have higher taxes and more […]
[…] then shared this tweet pointing out that the bottom 10 percent of people in America would be middle class compared to their counterparts in […]
[…] United States has a big income advantage over European nations, but it’s driven by hours worked rather than […]
[…] United States has a big income advantage over European nations, but it’s driven by hours worked rather than […]
[…] if you prefer comparing developed nations, I’ve previously noted that poor people in the United States have the same amount of income as middle-class people in […]
[…] if you prefer comparing developed nations, I’ve previously noted that poor people in the United States have the same amount of income as middle-class people in […]
[…] if you prefer comparing developed nations, I’ve previously noted that poor people in the United States have the same amount of income as middle-class people in […]
[…] here’s a chart that I first shared earlier this year, which I’ve augmented in red to highlight how the bottom 10 percent of people in the United […]
[…] More important, the larger fiscal burden in Scandinavia help to explain why Americans enjoy higher living standards. […]
Hi Dan,
What year does the Relative Living Standards chart represent?
Thanks!
Reblogged this on Boudica BPI Weblog.
Reblogged this on Politics Religion and Family.
Reblogged this on Gds44's Blog.