Here’s what I wrote last month about the fiscal situation in Illinois.
Illinois is a mess. Taxes and spending already are too high, and huge unfunded liabilities point to an even darker future.
Simply stated, politicians and government employee unions have created an unholy alliance to extract as much money as possible from the state’s beleaguered private sector. That’s not a surprise. Indeed, it’s easily explained by the “stationary bandit” theory of government. But while the bandit of government may be stationary, the victims are not. At least not in a nation with 50 different states.
Looking at this grim situation, the state legislature decided it had to act.
Unfortunately, the politicians in Springfield decided that action meant stepping on the accelerator while driving in the wrong direction. Democrats in the state legislature (joined by some big-government Republicans, just like in Kansas) just overrode Governor Rauner’s veto and imposed a huge tax hike on a state that already has one of the nation’s highest tax burdens.
This will hasten the state’s collapse.
Here’s what I said earlier this week about the prospect of another tax hike in the state.
I specifically want to highlight something I said about halfway through the interview about the burden of government spending in Illinois compared to regional competitors.
Here’s a chart I prepared based on data culled from the Census Bureau. As you can see, per-capita outlays are higher in Illinois than in neighboring states. In some cases, thousands of dollars higher.
Given this data, I’d like to ask the people of Illinois the same question I asked an audience in Paris when comparing France and Switzerland. What exactly are you getting for all that money?
The answer is nothing. Just like the French governments spends far more than the Swiss government without delivering better services, the Illinois government spends far more than the Indiana government without delivering better services.
Instead, the money gets diverted to the pockets of the various interest groups. In the case of Illinois, it’s almost as if the state exists to enrich a cossetted class of state and local bureaucrats.
The Wall Street Journal’s editorial earlier this week made several key points.
In Illinois, Democrats spent the long weekend coaxing Republican legislators to join their suicide pact to raise taxes to plug a $6 billion deficit… And don’t forget the $130 billion unfunded pension liability—
none of which will be solved by the $5 billion tax hike. …The state legislature is controlled by public unions that refuse to compromise. …Pensions will consume about a quarter of Illinois’s general fund this year. Nearly 40% of state education dollars go toward teacher pensions, and the state paid nearly as much into the State Universities Retirement System last year as it spent on higher education. Anemic revenue and economic growth can’t keep up with entitlement spending. The state’s GDP has ticked up by a mere 0.8% annually over the last four years compared to 2% nationwide and 1.4% in the Great Lakes region. Since 2010 more than 520,000 Illinois residents on net have fled to other states.
And Jonathan Williams of the American Legislative Exchange Council also opined on the mess in Illinois.
…the focus should be on fixing the state’s big-government policy prescriptions that are killing economic growth and opportunity. It should come as no surprise that businesses and citizens continue to leave the Land of Lincoln in droves. The credit rating agencies are right to question Illinois’ ability to pay its bills, as the tax base flees to other states. …When the rosy accounting assumptions are stripped away, Illinois has a dismal 23.77 percent funding ratio, $362.6 billion in total amount of unfunded liabilities. That staggering number represents an unfunded pension liability of $28,200 for every man, woman and child in Illinois. …one might assume the state government is not bringing in enough revenue and merely needs to raise taxes. This is simply false. According to Tax Foundation’s analysis, Illinois’ taxpayers pay the 5th highest combined state-local tax burden in America. …It should come as no surprise, then, that nearly 700,000 Illinois residents left from 2006-2015… Only New York and California experienced higher levels of domestic out-migration during the same period.
The bottom line is that this latest tax hike will cause more productive people to leave the state. Politicians in the state also will have an excuse to postpone much-needed reforms of the state pension system, which is the primary threat to long-run solvency. And government, which already is too big, will become an even bigger burden.
P.S. At some point, I need to write about Indiana, a state that quietly has amassed a very good track record of fiscal prudence. Especially since it’s about to benefit from an influx of tax refugees from its neighbor to the west.
[…] bolster my argument, I pointed to states such as Illinois, California, and New Jersey. They all have provisions to limit red ink, yet there is more […]
[…] queréis pruebas de esa afirmación, fijaos en estados como Illinois, California y Nueva Jersey. Todos tienen disposiciones contra los números rojos, pero cada año […]
[…] large part because of unions, California, Illinois, and New York are essentially bankrupt. Ohio, New Mexico, and Oregon are also in serious trouble […]
[…] large part because of unions, California, Illinois, and New York are essentially bankrupt. Ohio, New Mexico, and Oregon are also in serious trouble […]
[…] large part because of unions, California, Illinois, and New York are essentially bankrupt. Ohio, New Mexico, and Oregon are also in serious trouble […]
[…] you want proof for that assertion, check out states such as Illinois, California, and New Jersey. They all have provisions to limit red ink, yet there is more […]
[…] you want proof for that assertion, check out states such as Illinois, California, and New Jersey. They all have provisions to limit red ink, yet there is more […]
[…] me sorprende ver a Alaska, Illinois, Connecticut y Nueva Jersey en la parte más baja de las clasificaciones. Todos ellos eran […]
[…] Even though I wrote about proposed tax increases in Illinois just 10 days ago, it’s time to revisit the issue because the Tax Foundation just published a very informative article about the state’s self-destructive fiscal policy. […]
[…] did a poll earlier this year, asking which state would be the first to suffer a fiscal crisis, I wasn’t terribly surprised that Illinois wound up in first […]
[…] did a poll earlier this year, asking which state would be the first to suffer a fiscal crisis, I wasn’t terribly surprised that Illinois wound up in first […]
[…] I did a poll earlier this year, asking which state would be the first to suffer a fiscal crisis, I wasn’t terribly surprised that Illinois wound up in first […]
[…] have a reasonable rate since it’s politically difficult to pillage everyone (though Illinois is trying very hard to be an exception to that […]
[…] not surprised to see Alaska, Illinois, Connecticut, and New Jersey near the bottom of the rankings. All of them were choices in my poll […]
[…] 50 states have some form of balanced budget requirement, yet that doesn’t stop states such as Illinois, California, and New Jersey from over-taxing and over-spending, or from accumulating more […]
[…] 50 states have some form of balanced budget requirement, yet that doesn’t stop states such as Illinois, California, and New Jersey from over-taxing and over-spending, or from accumulating more […]
[…] Anybody want to guess whether New Jersey collapses before California, Illinois, or Connecticut? They’re all in the process of committing slow-motion […]
[…] were doing their best to suffocate the private sector, and also warned that a tax hike would push the state even closer to a day of […]
Democrats do not know how to create economic opportunities.
[…] such as Illinois, California, New York, Connecticut, and New Jersey have very serious structural problems because of […]
“The INCREDIBLE SHRINKING Of Illinois: High Taxes And Low Economic Freedom Have Led To State Crisis”
by DEAN STANSEL AND ORPHE DIVOUNGUY
http://dailycaller.com/2018/01/24/the-incredible-shrinking-of-illinois-high-taxes-and-low-economic-freedom-have-led-to-state-crisis/
[…] would be a strong contender. That was true even before 2017. And now that the state legislature rammed through a big tax increase, Illinois is trying even harder to be the nation’s most uncompetitive […]
[…] added pressure for lower tax rates in states like New York and California. And New Jersey, Illinois, […]
[…] mean added pressure for lower tax rates in states like New York and California. And New Jersey, Illinois, and […]
Democrats are clueless about how the economy works.
amazon gets to keep 1.32 billion in income taxes paid by it’s own workers…
a personal income-tax diversion? for jeff bezos?
“Rahm and Rauner promise to shower Jeff Bezos with tax breaks and real estate.”
“Chicago’s Amazon HQ2 bid offers money for nothing, TIFs for free”
By Ben Joravsky @joravben
https://www.chicagoreader.com/chicago/chicagos-amazon-hq2-bid-money-for-nothing-tifs-for-free/Content?oid=33535992
[…] when it makes life easier for tax-aholic politicians in states such as California, Connecticut, Illinois, New York, and New […]
[…] slow-motion suicide. I already mentioned Connecticut and you can add states such as California and Illinois to the […]
[…] the tax rates on these very successful taxpayers, as of 2010. Many of these states (California, Illinois, New Jersey, and Connecticut) have moved in the wrong direction since that time, while others (such […]
[…] definitely agree about the fiscal disasters of Connecticut and Illinois. And Michigan used to be in that […]
Liberal politicians want to tax and spend the United States into bankruptcy.
[…] but it also would get rid of a very unfair distortion that enables higher taxes in states such as Illinois, California, New York, New Jersey, and […]
[…] to highlight a specific bad policy. As you can imagine, states like California, Connecticut, Illinois, New York, and New Jersey give me a never-ending amount of […]
[…] not good budget policy. It’s basically what happens in poorly governed places like Greece and Illinois. But it’s not default. There wouldn’t be any risk to financial markets if the Treasury […]
[…] of state and local governments to impose bad policy. I criticize states such as California and Illinois when they expand the burden of government. And I criticize local entities such as Hartford, […]
I am waiting for congress to try to do an end run around the no state bankruptcy law.
Those of us in more conservative states had better keep our eyes open.
I sure as he!! don’t want to pay to bail out those irresponsible idiots.
Even more interesting would be to weigh the in/out migration numbers by net worth and income and/or earning potential. That would provide a better metric for prosperity migration. It’s likely that strong prosperity contributors are leaving and being partially replaced by less capable individuals seeking benefits. A death spiral.
Having little endowment of natural beauty (like e.g. California where the economic distortion bubble can grow much bigger) Illinois is doomed to a quick correction. Permanent decline could be the correction.
Dan Great analysis – have you given any thought for how it ends for these states? I’m told by Dave Walker who you might want to support for his run for Governor for Connecticut as I have – he says states can’t declare bankruptcy – his phone number is 202 679 0257 cell
I’m writing a book : America in Denial – can you guide me to the right person at CATO to see if we might want to partner with us?
John Knubel @gmail.com 301 502 1445