It’s easy to define and/or understand most statist policies.
- We know that a tax increase is when politicians take (or, given the Laffer Curve, try to take) more of your money based on your decisions to work, save, shop, or invest.
- We know that protectionism is when politicians use taxes and other policies to restrict your freedom to buy goods and services produced in other nations.
- We know that a minimum wage mandate is when politicians criminalize employment contracts between consenting adults, thus harming low-skilled workers.
- We know that Keynesian “stimulus” is when politicians borrow from one part of the economy and spend in another part of the economy and pretend there’s more money.
The list is potentially endless, but there’s one statist policy – cronyism – that I haven’t added to the list because I haven’t thought of a simple definition.
Are bailouts cronyism? Yes, but it’s more than that. Are subsidies cronyism? Yes, but it’s more than that. Are favors in the tax code cronyism? Yes, but it’s more than that. Are trade barriers cronyism? Yes, but it’s more than that.
You’re probably noticing a pattern, which is why this new visual from the Mercatus Center is helpful. It illustrates that there are many policies that should be considered cronyism.
And Mercatus comes up with a definition that we can add to our list.
- We know that cronyism is when politicians create “privileges that governments give to particular businesses and industries.”
Speaking of which, one of the most damaging features of cronyism is the way that it gives capitalism a bad name.
Many people equate free markets with “business.” So when people in the business sector get special favors, regular folks conclude that capitalism is a “rigged” system.
In theory, this false impression could be offset by an aggressive educational campaign by those who support free enterprise. Unfortunately, that task is rather difficult since many people assume Republicans are the pro-capitalism party. So when they see the GOP favoring corrupt handouts to business such as the Export-Import Bank and the sleazy ethanol program, they conclude – once again – that capitalism is rigged for the politically powerful.
And the battle to separate capitalism from cronyism is further hindered when major figures in the business world (such as Warren Buffett) get in bed with government.
Another example is Elon Musk, the head of Tesla, Solar City, and SpaceX. He is known as a visionary entrepreneur, which is good. But Andy Quinlan of the Center for Freedom and Prosperity explains that he also has put taxpayers on the hook to underwrite and prop up much of his business activities.
It was announced this week that one of Elon Musk’s companies, Tesla Motors, will buy one of his other companies, SolarCity, for an all-stock deal worth $2.6 billion. …With the amount of taxpayer support both companies have received, perhaps the rest of us should get a vote… The deal comes as SolarCity has floundered despite significant taxpayer support through a bevy of state and federal tax credits and subsidies. Nevertheless, the solar energy company’s stock has been in long term decline as the company struggles to develop a profitable market not reliant on generous helpings of taxpayer support. Tesla, too, has fed repeatedly at the government trough. The government provided federal loan guarantees and tax credits to help manufacture its electric vehicles. It also subsidized the purchase of those same vehicles to increase sales. Even still, the company makes more money selling “carbon credits” to other manufacturers than it does electric vehicles. …Musk’s other endeavor, SpaceX, also relies heavily on government. Obviously much of its business comes from government contracts, but more interesting is how those contracts are apparently obtained. …this year’s National Defense Authorization Act contains an amendment from Senator John McCain designed to eliminate from competition the Defense Department’s current supplier of rockets and pave the way for SpaceX to take over, despite the fact that its rockets aren’t yet powerful enough for the job.
Writing for Reason, Veronique de Rugy adds her insight
Elon Musk delivered a much-anticipated speech…where he laid out his vision for colonizing Mars…a testament to human innovation and determination. …it might be more impressive if Musk could provide a vision for how his companies can succeed here on Earth first, especially without heavy reliance on taxpayer support. …Musk is no stranger to cozy relations with federal and state governments. All three of his companies have benefited heavily from taxpayers. Yet despite generous green energy handouts, his SolarCity is heavily indebted. He now wants to merge it with his electric car company, Tesla Motors, which also benefited from almost $1.3 billion in subsidies. Solidifying his crony credentials, the epitome of crony capitalism itself, the Export-Import Bank of the United States, has subsidized the payloads for numerous SpaceX launches. The Ex-Im Bank’s chairman misrepresented this as support for “small business.” …There’s no doubt that Musk is an impressive salesman and innovator. …Now that he has set his sights on Mars, let’s hope—for the future of science and exploration—that he…has the courtesy to leave taxpayers out of it.
Amen.
It’s great when entrepreneurs are successful. And I don’t resent their wealth in the slightest.
But only if they earn their money honestly, in a genuinely free and competitive market.
Cronyism, by contrast, is a cancer that compromises and erodes genuine capitalism.
P.S. Let’s close on a more upbeat and entertaining topic, which is the bipartisan mockery of politicians.
I shared a very funny post about American leftists escaping to Canada after the Tea Party election of 2010.
Here’s some related humor about Canada closing the border for the next eight years.
One unfortunate aspect of being a libertarian is that you’re almost always unhappy about whoever becomes President. Indeed, I’ve only been pleased with one President who has served in my lifetime.
So I’m not overflowing with sympathy for Republicans who were unhappy after the 2012 election. And I’m similarly immune to feelings of empathy for Democrats who are unhappy about this election.
Especially the leftists who are engaging is hysterical hyperbolic histrionics (how’s that for alliteration!) about Trump. Here’s some great satire about the millennials protesting against Trump’s victory.
As anti-Trump rallies nationwide turned hostile overnight with widespread reports of violence, looting, vandalism, and death threats against the president-elect and his supporters, police in numerous major cities were able to instill calm and regain control by handing out participation trophies to all millennial protesters who were enraged about losing the election, sources confirmed. …“It’s a foreign notion to them. Even in sports—win or lose, everyone won, and everyone got a trophy no matter what. This is the millennial way,” he said. “So I had the idea—hey, why not start handing out participation trophies to the protesters, and telling them ‘Hey, you know what? You may have lost the election, but look—everyone gets a trophy. Everyone’s a winner.’” Seeing how the trophies had an instantaneous calming effect on the millennials and filled them with a sense of fulfillment and achievement, word spread quickly among police departments nationwide, and emergency trophies were procured by the thousands for use at the rallies.
Speaking of which, here’s an amusing image that has a serious message. I agree with leftists who fear that Trump may abuse the vast powers of the federal government. But they supported Obama’s dubious expansion of executive power, so they don’t have much credibility on the issue.
Reminds me of this clever poster that the Libertarian Party created to mock the Occupy crazies.
The problem with liberals, like yourself, is that you think we want government control.
No, no, we want worker control. The capitalists love these bailouts resulting in the cronyism. It’s a feature of capitalism. It helps capitalists exploit who they need to exploit for capitalism to work.
[…] he’s obviously a great entrepreneur, but I don’t like the factthat he’s also benefited from some […]
[…] he’s obviously a great entrepreneur, but I don’t like the fact that he’s also benefited from some […]
[…] Needless to say, the above analysis gets much weaker if companies such as Tesla and Amazon are benefiting from government […]
[…] Unfortunately, stadium subsidies are just the tip of the cronyism iceberg. […]
[…] Republished from Dan Mitchell’s blog. […]
[…] Trump will be a swamp-wallowing cronyist, but we don’t yet have enough evidence (though a bad decision on Ex-Im certainly would be a very […]
[…] Trump will be a swamp-wallowing cronyist, but we don’t yet have enough evidence (though a bad decision on Ex-Im certainly would be a […]
[…] there’s also a distasteful argument for such a tax and it revolves around crony capitalists seeking to obtain unearned wealth by imposing costs on their […]
[…] almost as if cronyism is a business […]
[…] almost as if cronyism is a business […]
[…] almost as if cronyism is a business […]
[…] cronyism on […]
Hi Daniel!
I’m not sure if you believe what you’ve written here. Do you? Or is this satire? If you do believe what you wrote is true, are you interested in putting your ideas to various tests, and finding out if you are wrong or right? I’m interested in truth. And you and I disagree, if this isn’t satire. So I’m curious to see, if you’re up for it, if there are ways to find out which one of us knows the truth, or if, discouragingly, you also think that truth does not exist, and that truth really is only “relative.”
Thanks for responding if you do.
Best wishes,
Erik
The solution on climate change is to grow the economy at its maximum rate and deal with specific issues as they come up, with the greater resources that will then be available.
Affordable missions to space should be subsidized only if there is a military component.
Sustainable energy will only be viable if exposed to a non-subsidized free market.
So whats your solution on climate change, affordable missions to space, and sustainable energy? Take the subsidies out? If only this is done “fairly” and evenly across the board. Funny how you use Elon and his companies as a prime example.
It is frequently re-quoted and re-re-re-re-requoted without source material that Musk’s companies are heavily subsidized. I believe this to be patently false based on the available evidence. Would you the writer care to quote some source material that contains specific and verifiable data that backs up the assertions you and your sources have made?
Thank you sir.
http://www.bing.com/videos/search?q=Milleials+You+Have+to+Love&&view=detail&mid=F08DBD62AB8973000068F08DBD62AB8973000068&FORM=VRDGAR
Out of curiosity why are you singling out elon musk and the companies he associates with? A good reporter would show more than one example of a topic and not just bash one individual or company for a countries systemic problems. The companies in reference secured LOANS from the government to help move america towards clean energy which is something the public has asked for. I might add that Tesla has actually paid those back. And getting supplies to and from the space station for a fraction of the price of NASA is something as a taxpayer you should be grateful for. Solar City/Tesla are actually one of the few disruptors in the monopolies that are the current energy and auto monopolies. Look at Nevada adding extra taxes on people who install solar energy to their homes just because the nuclear power companies owned by Warren Buffett in the area are scared of viable competition. You did not mention any other companies like BP, Duke Power, GM, etc that receive subsidies or bailouts so they can maintain failing business models just for the sake of keeping the status quo. Don’t feed people one sided BS and pretend to call it journalism when its actually just your prujudicial bias. Cant believe i wasted my time reading this.
Capitalists play by and on the edge of the rules. Right now the “rules” say that the best payback comes for lobbying for any of the above handouts.
Eliminate government and you change the rules.
[…] Reposted from International Liberty […]