The 2011 edition of Economic Freedom of the World, published by Canada’s Fraser Institute (with help from groups like Cato), has been released.
Covering data through 2009, the new report provides damning evidence of the negative impact of the Bush-Obama policies of bigger government and more intervention.
Here’s a relevant passage from the Executive Summary.
The world’s largest economy, the United States, has suffered one of the largest declines in economic freedom over the last 10 years, pushing it into tenth place. Much of this decline is a result of higher government spending and borrowing and lower scores for the legal structure and property rights components. Over the longer term, the summary chain-linked ratings of Venezuela, Zimbabwe, United States, and Malaysia fell by eight-tenths of a point or more between 1990 and 2009, causing their rankings to slip.
This chart, taken directly from the book, shows how the United States has been of the world’s five-worst performers over the past decade, putting America in a very unfortunate category.
The previous chart shows the decline in America’s absolute ranking. And here’s a chart I created showing how the United States has declined relative to other nations. Simply stated, America is on the verge of falling out of the top 10, after being the 3rd-freest economy in the world at the end of the Clinton Administration.
Thanks George and Barack.
By the way, Hong Kong and Singapore are the top two nations, where they’ve ranked for quite some time. Here is the full top-10 list.
1. Hong Kong
2. Singapore
3. New Zealand
4. Switzerland
5. Australia
6. Canada
7. Chile
8. United Kingdom
9. Mauritius
10. United States
[…] by the quality and quantity of labor and capital in the economy. Unfortunately, it appears that the Bush-Obama policies of bigger government have had a negative […]
[…] one of my favorite nations for the simple reason that it consistently gets very high scores from Economic Freedom of the World and the Index of Economic Freedom (as well as from Doing Business, Global Competitiveness […]
[…] religiously write about each year’s report (starting back in 2011), and I also cite the data dozens of time each year when analyzing policy in various […]
[…] the Tea Party because it was made up of people who were upset by the bipartisan waste and corruption of Washington. And I think they even had a positive – albeit only […]
[…] admired the Tea Party because it was made up of people who were upset by the bipartisan waste and corruption of Washington. And I think they even had a positive – albeit only temporary – […]
[…] Clinton left office, the United States had the world’s 3rd-freest economy. Today, thanks to years of statism under both Bush and Obama, we’ve dropped to […]
[…] is one of my favorite nations for the simple reason that it consistently gets very high scores from Economic Freedom of the World and the Index of Economic Freedom (as well as from Doing Business, Global Competitiveness Report, […]
[…] been grousing for years that the Bush-Obama policies have eroded America’s competitiveness and undermined economic […]
[…] noting that he finds that this bad news really started back in 2000, which makes sense given that both Bush and Obama have pushed policies that have expanded the clumsy footprint of […]
[…] That’s where we disagree. And if you want to know which one of us is right, just check what happened to America’s rating in Economic Freedom of the World during the Bush […]
[…] by the quality and quantity of labor and capital in the economy. Unfortunately, it appears that the Bush-Obama policies of bigger government have had a negative […]
[…] problem with Obama is that he hasn’t fixed any of the problems. Instead, he haskept in place all of the bad policies – and in some cases made them […]
[…] against European schemes for bank taxes. No wonder Canada now ranks above America in both the Economic Freedom of the World Index and the Index of Economic […]
[…] I suppose I should add another caveat. It’s not Democrats that ruined Detroit. It’s big government. As shown by the Bush years, you get equally bad results when Republicans expand the size and scope of Washington. […]
[…] year, the U.S. fell from 7th to 10th, and I though dropping three spots was bad. But falling by eight spots this past year is a stunning […]
[…] by the quality and quantity of labor and capital in the economy. Unfortunately, it appears that the Bush-Obama policies of bigger government have had a negative […]
[…] by the quality and quantity of labor and capital in the economy. Unfortunately, it appears that the Bush-Obama policies of bigger government have had a negative […]
[…] me bad news. It’s somewhat depressing, after all, to read that the United States has dropped from the #3 nation when Bill Clinton left office to the #18 country in the most recent […]
[…] news. It’s somewhat depressing, after all, to read that the United States has dropped from the #3 nation when Bill Clinton left office to the #18 country in the most recent […]
[…] if you look at broad measures of economic freedom, America tends to be in – or near – the top 10 (though that’s more a reflection of how bad other nations […]
[…] not willing to trade places with either nation, but that may change at some point. The Bush-Obama policies of bigger government and more intervention have made America less attractive, while other nations have learned from their […]
[…] I suppose I should add another caveat. It’s not Democrats that ruined Detroit. It’s big government. As shown by the Bush years, you get equally bad results when Republicans expand the size and scope of Washington. […]
[…] make sure you apply the same term to Republicans who impose the same types of policies, such as Bush and […]
[…] year, the U.S. fell from 7th to 10th, and I though dropping three spots was bad. But falling by eight spots this past year is a stunning […]
[…] 7 to take whatever steps are necessary to prevent Romney from becoming another RINO such as Bush or […]
[…] 7 to take whatever steps are necessary to prevent Romney from becoming another RINO such as Bush or […]
[…] if you look at broad measures of economic freedom, America tends to be in – or near – the top 10 (though that’s more a reflection of how bad other nations […]
[…] year, the U.S. fell from 7th to 10th, and I though dropping three spots was bad. But falling by eight spots this past year is a stunning […]
[…] year, the U.S. fell from 7th to 10th, and I though dropping three spots was bad. But falling by eight spots this past year is a stunning […]
[…] year, the U.S. fell from 7th to 10th, and I though dropping three spots was bad. But falling by eight spots this past year is a stunning […]
[…] As an American, I’m ashamed to say that these publications also show which nations are moving in the wrong direction. And the United States ranks poorly by this metric, having dropped from 3rd place to 10th place since 2000 according to Economic Freedom of the World. […]
[…] As an American, I’m ashamed to say that these publications also show which nations are moving in the wrong direction. And the United States ranks poorly by this metric, having dropped from 3rd place to 10th place since 2000 according to Economic Freedom of the World. […]
[…] As an American, I’m ashamed to say that these publications also show which nations are moving in the wrong direction. And the United States ranks poorly by this metric, having dropped from 3rd place to 10th place since 2000 according to Economic Freedom of the World. […]
[…] As an American, I’m ashamed to say that these publications also show which nations are moving in the wrong direction. And the United States ranks poorly by this metric, having dropped from 3rd place to 10th place since 2000 according to Economic Freedom of the World. […]
[…] if you look at broad measures of economic freedom, America tends to be in – or near – the top 10 (though that’s more a reflection of how bad other nations […]
[…] if you look at broad measures of economic freedom, America tends to be in – or near – the top 10 (though that’s more a reflection of how bad other nations […]
[…] problem with Obama is that he hasn’t fixed any of the problems. Instead, he has kept in place all of the bad policies – and in some cases made them worse. Indeed, I challenge anyone to identify a meaningful […]
[…] not willing to trade places with either nation, but that may change at some point. The Bush-Obama policies of bigger government and more intervention have made America less attractive, while other nations have learned from their […]
[…] problem with Obama is that he hasn’t fixed any of the problems. Instead, he has kept in place all of the bad policies – and in some cases made them worse. Indeed, I challenge anyone to identify a meaningful […]
[…] make sure you apply the same term to Republicans who impose the same types of policies, such as Bush and Nixon. Like this:LikeBe the first to like this. By Everette Hatcher III, on June 18, 2012 at […]
[…] make sure you apply the same term to Republicans who impose the same types of policies, such as Bush and Nixon. Rate this:Share […]
[…] not willing to trade places with either nation, but that may change at some point. The Bush-Obama policies of bigger government and more intervention have made America less attractive, while other nations have learned from their […]
[…] important, but it’s also noteworthy that some jurisdictions have good policy, and Hong Kong and Singapore are always at the top of those lists. The Asian financial hubs of Singapore and Hong Kong, on the […]
[…] on auto-pilot. And we know the painful day of reckoning will arrive even faster if we continue the Bush-Obama policies of expanding the burden of the public […]
[…] problem with Obama is that he hasn’t fixed any of the problems. Instead, he has kept in place all of the bad policies – and in some cases made them worse. Indeed, I challenge anyone to identify a meaningful […]
[…] problem with Obama is that he hasn’t fixed any of the problems. Instead, he has kept in place all of the bad policies – and in some cases made them worse. Indeed, I challenge anyone to identify a meaningful […]
[…] problem with Obama is that he hasn’t fixed any of the problems. Instead, he has kept in place all of the bad policies – and in some cases made them worse. Indeed, I challenge anyone to identify a meaningful […]
[…] Clinton’s track record on spending was especially good. Indeed, I even admitted on TV that I would accept Clinton-era tax rates if we could unravel all the new spending and intervention of the Bush-Obama years. […]
[…] data is that people in Hong Kong appear to be the most sympathetic to regulation. Considering that Hong Kong is the most economically free jurisdiction in the world, this doesn’t make much […]
[…] data is that people in Hong Kong appear to be the most sympathetic to regulation. Considering that Hong Kong is the most economically free jurisdiction in the world, this doesn’t make much sense. Rate this: Share […]
[…] it’s also worth remembering that tax policy is just one of many factors that determine economic […]
[…] it’s also worth remembering that tax policy is just one of many factors that determine economic […]
[…] it’s also worth remembering that tax policy is just one of many factors that determine economic […]
[…] it’s not just the past couple of years. The second chart, using data from the Economic Freedom of the World Index, shows that the United States has declined over the past 11 years thanks to Bush-Obama […]
[…] it’s not just the past couple of years. The second chart, using data from the Economic Freedom of the World Index, shows that the United States has declined over the past 11 years thanks to Bush-Obama […]
[…] in this key measure of competitiveness. Thanks to the statist policies of both Bush and Obama, America has dropped from 3rd in 2000 to 10th in the most recent rankings. jQuery('#lazyload_post_0 img').lazyload({placeholder: […]
[…] I’ll simply call your attention to this post, which shows how America’s score in the Economic Freedom of the World ranking declined during […]
[…] Now they have a new video that looks at recent developments in the United States. Unfortunately, you will learn that the U.S. is slipping in the wrong direction. […]
[…] Inflation Rises More-than-expected Protestors should just get out and vote | Troy Media Corporation New Rankings from Economic Freedom of the World Reveal Dismal Impact of Bus.. Posted by The Libertarian at 15:41 Email ThisBlogThis!Share to TwitterShare […]
[…] Now they have a new video that looks at recent developments in the United States. Unfortunately, you will learn that the U.S. is slipping in the wrong direction. […]
[…] Now they have a new video that looks at recent developments in the United States. Unfortunately, you will learn that the U.S. is slipping in the wrong direction. […]
[…] Now they have a new video that looks at recent developments in the United States. Unfortunately, you will learn that the U.S. is slipping in the wrong direction. […]
[…] has better economic policy. The United States may have become more statist in the past decade, dropping from 3rd to 10th in the Economic Freedom of the World rankings, but 10th place is still a heck of a lot better than 92nd place, which is where China currently […]
Amazing how Switzerland -the Helvetic Confederation-, the country where the people can limit the most the power of the political class, has the 4th place in economic freedom. In Switzerland almost any law can be voted by the people on referendum. The Swiss democracy started in 1291, I do not know about any regime that is that old. The Swiss stopped imperialisms like Napoleon´s and Hitler´s: Napoleon tried to establish the “Helvetian Republic” but he had to quit Switzerland who reinstated its confederation. Hitler never dared to attack Switzerland, the National SOCIALISTS knew that ultra democratic Switzerland was very hard to conquer.
Here http://davekopel.org/2a/OthWr/Target_Switzerland.htm can be read a beautiful account about how the Swiss prepared for an attack by the National SOCIALISTS. A very revealing extract:
Switzerland also had a decentralized, direct democracy which could not be surrendered to a foreign enemy by a political elite. Some governments surrendered to Hitler without resistance based on the decision of a king or dictator; this was institutionally impossible in Switzerland. If an ordinary Swiss citizen was told that the Federal President–a relatively powerless official–had surrendered the country, the citizen might not even know the president’s name, and would have held any “surrender” order in contempt.
[….]
Let it be remembered that Switzerland took in more Jewish refugees than the United States took in refugees of all kinds.
Nr 1 and Nr 2 in freedom are Hong Kong and Singapore. Both are non-democracies (Singapore is authoritarian according to many). Non democracy is too dangerous, R.J. Rummel showed that democracies impede mass murder by governments and that democracies do not wage wars to each others proving that dictatorship is the cause of both war and mass murder by governments.
[…] The 2011 edition of Economic Freedom of the World, published by Canada's Fraser Institute (with help from groups like Cato), has been released. Covering data through 2009, the new report provides damning evidence of the negative impact of the Bush-Obama policies of bigger government and more intervention. Here's a relevant passage from the Executive Summary. The world’s largest economy, the United States, has suffered one of the largest declines … Read More […]
Why are Taxes going Up on The Wealthy?
To Subsidize NAFTA_WTO involvement.
They enabled the stripping out of the Best Performing Manufacturing for Export Sales from Our Nations Economy.
1 in 6 Americans are Now in Poverty
1 in 5 USA Children are Now in Poverty
1 in 5 Americans are now on Food Stamps
1 in 5 American Children are now on Food Stamps
400,000 New Unemployed every 30 days for the past 3 consecutive Years with no end in sight..
If Our Military decided to move to another Nation because of a boost to their Stock Holdings .. thus jeopardizing the Nations Safety and Security ..
What would your Opinion BE?
Treason? Treachery?
Fools in Congress who Legislated this Behavior to be Quasi Racketeering Legal?
Have Any of You an Idea how to now Create a New Corporation to take the place of the Corporate Division you just handed off to the Communist Red Chinese Government?
I didn’t think so.
Blah_Blah Freedom of Trade ..
You Tell Me what YOU intend to do with 400,000 New Unemployed every 30 Days?
Retrain them?
They are Factory Workers .. with Families and Mortgages.
Where in GOD’s Name do You Congress Clowns get off LEGALIZING THE STRIPPING OF OUR NATIONS ECONOMIC ENGINES OF HISTORIC PROSPERITY and HANDING THEM OFF TO COMMUNIST RED CHINA?
The REASON we’re in Decline is ex CIA chief G.H.W.Bush and Bill Clinton:
racketeering Legislation which ties the USA into NAFTA_WTO which operates from a behind closed doors group of ‘investing advisers’.
Clintons Economy ran not under operative NAFTA_WTO rules.
G.W.Bushs Economy ran under NAFTA_WTO rules and Tanked Two Terms.
Obama’s Economy suffers under NAFTA_WTO rules .. generating Zero Jobs and SOLYNDRA going bust because NAFTA_WTO choose where the Manufacturing will be located for Corporate Profits .. not .. National Wealth Generation by the Corporates Home Nation.
What does America get for NAFTA_WTO losses of large Corporate Manufacturing .. the Wealth which Made America an Advanced Nation?
A Token Sales Tax which goes to the Cayman Island Tax Avoidance Accounts legalized by Our Elected Congress for their Campaign Contributing Corporate Friends.
Racketeering Legislation against the Economic Stability & Security of Our Nation?
We Lose forever:
Research _ Development _ New Product Sales _ Marketing _ Manufacturing _ Head Quarters
Entirely Stripped Out of Our Nations Economy Forever thanks to Congress.
Talentless Oblivious Fools:
http://theeconomiccollapseblog.com/archives/ge-ceo-jeffrey-immelt-the-head-of-obamas-jobs-council-is-moving-jobs-and-economic-infrastructure-to-china-at-a-blistering-pace
.
Making Legal to Gut the Nation of Entire Corporate Divisions and Hand them over to Communist Red China?
Rectal Sphincters?