Thanks to demographics and ill-conceived entitlement programs, America is on a path to becoming a bankrupt European-style welfare state. We know how to fix this problem, but whether we make the necessary reforms depends on the heart and soul of the GOP.
Are Republicans a bunch of hard-right Tea Party types, salivating at the thought of reversing the welfare state and ushering a new ear of limited government?
Or are GOPers a bunch of political hacks who have decided the cesspool of Washington is really a hot tub and merely pretend to be fiscally conservative to appease the conservative base?
The answer is yes and yes.
More specifically, almost all politicians are some combination of these two descriptions. It’s almost like they have an angel on one shoulder and a devil on the other.
They usually have some underlying principles, and they would like to do the right thing and make America a better place.
Yet they also want to get reelected and accumulate power, and this lures them into casting votes that they know are bad for the country.
Sometimes the devil has the most influence. During the Bush years, for instance, most Republicans on Capitol Hill went along with Bush’s bad proposals, such as the no-bureaucrat-left-behind education bill, the prescription drug entitlement, the corrupt farm bills, the pork-filled transportation bills, and the TARP bailout. The lawmakers will admit, especially in private, that those were bad votes, but they “went along to get along.”
Yet every so often the angel gets control. All Republicans, including the ones who were in office and doing the wrong thing during the Bush years, presumably are going to vote for Congressman Paul Ryan’s budget later this week, which would limit the growth of federal spending and fundamentally reform Medicare and Medicaid. And they’ll cast that vote even though they’ll get demagogued in 2012.
So what decides whether the angel or devil is in charge? I may not have learned much in my 25 years in Washington, but I think a key factor is that politicians are often willing to take political risks and do the right thing if they think there’s actually a chance of implementing good policy.
In other words, there is a chance of saving America. I think Republicans can be convinced to charge the machine gun nests of big government. But we need to create the right set of circumstances – and that means persuading them that the long-run policy benefits will offset the short-run political risks.
[…] also have to convince them that they can enact good policy while also keeping their […]
[…] also have to convince them that they can enact good policy while also keeping their […]
[…] Politicians are not necessarily or automatically evil. Instead, they screw up in large part because of perverse incentives. […]
[…] are not necessarily or automatically evil. Instead, they screw up in large part because of perverse […]
[…] I suppose I could play that game by saying that I’d rather eat fast food than patronize most fancy restaurants (especially if I have to pay the bill!). And I’ve unintentionally played that game already by admitting that politicians aren’t always sinister and evil. […]
[…] I suppose I could play that game by saying that I’d rather eat fast food than patronize most fancy restaurants (especially if I have to pay the bill!). And I’ve unintentionally played that game already by admitting that politicians aren’t always sinister and evil. […]
[…] this doesn’t mean the fight against the income tax is hopeless. As I’ve explained when writing about American politicians, lawmakers are often tempted to do the wrong thing. They may frequently surrender to temptation and […]
[…] that he’s completely bad. I’ve made the point before that most politicians are a combination of good and bad […]
[…] bottom line is that GOPers are both good and bad. Here’s what I wrote back in 2011 and it still applies […]
[…] I’ve already explained that politicians are a combination of good and evil, I actually think both cartoons are […]
[…] This doesn’t mean that GOPers are hopeless, but it does confirm my point that almost all politicians are a combination of good and bad impulses. It’s sort of like they have an angel on one shoulder and a devil on the other shoulder. […]
[…] politicians more than 99.9 percent of the population. Even in my kindest moments, I see them as occasionally well-intentioned souls who are easily corrupted. Most of the time, they are a plague on society, as this cartoon […]
[…] politicians more than 99.9 percent of the population. Even in my kindest moments, I see them as occasionally well-intentioned souls who are easily corrupted. Most of the time, they are a plague on society, as this cartoon […]
[…] don’t know Roosevelt’s motives, Like most politicians, he probably listened to both the angel (however misguided) on one shoulder and the devil on the […]
[…] I wrote a few months ago that all politicians are a combination of good and evil. During the Bush years, the devil on one shoulder completely dominated and Republicans unambiguously became part of the problem. […]
[…] I’ve posted before, I don’t think there is such a thing as a perfect (or completely flawed) politician. The real […]
[…] or are they in the business of blowing smoke while getting a cut of the corruption in Washington? I explained yesterday that GOPers in Washington are governed by noble and base impulses. The budget deal was an example […]
[…] or are they in the business of blowing smoke while getting a cut of the corruption in Washington? I explained yesterday that GOPers in Washington are governed by noble and base impulses. The budget deal was an example […]
Why not have a “spending trigger” instead, if politicians spend too much the Department of Energy is abolished. If they keep spending more than they have the Department of Education is abolished, if they still keep spending the National Labor Relations Board is abolished. There are countless things that could be “triggered” out of business, and all o them would free up our economy and ut people back to work.
For instance, the “Dept. of Energy” does nothing but PREVENT us from drilling for oil and natural gas, they try to prevent coal mining and coal burning and they try to prevent building of Nuclear Plants.
If we abolish the Dept. of Energy we get an immediate 200,000 jobs in offshore drilling and gas recovery in the shale fields in New York and Pennsylvania.
Spending reduced, jobs created, or “not prevented”.