Back in 2010, I shared a remarkable graph comparing the predictions of economists to what actually happened.
Not surprisingly, the two lines don’t exactly overlap, which explains the old joke that economists have correctly predicted nine of the last five recessions.
It’s not that economists are totally useless. It’s just that they don’t do a very good job when they venture into the filed of macroeconomics, as Russ Roberts succinctly explained. And they look especially foolish when they try to engage in forecasting.
But at least economists sometimes can be entertaining, though usually in the laughing-at-you rather than laughing-with-you way.
Consider, for instance, the escapades of one of Portugal’s leading economic analysts. Here’s some of what the UK-based Guardian recently reported.
As an ex-presidential consultant, a former adviser to the World Bank, a financial researcher for the United Nations and a professor in the US, Artur Baptista da Silva’s outspoken attacks on Portugal’s austerity cuts made the bespectacled 61-year-old one of the country’s leading media pundits last year. …Mr Baptista da Silva…claimed to be a social economics professor at Milton College – a private university in Wisconsin, US…and to be masterminding a UN research project into the effects of the recession on southern European countries.
Mr. da Silva was sort of the Paul Krugman of Portugal, working with the left and urging Keynesian policy.
Blessed with such an impressive CV, Mr Baptista’s subsequent criticisms of the Lisbon government’s far-reaching austerity cuts, as well as dire warnings that the UN planned to take action against it, struck a deep chord with its financially beleaguered population. According to the Spanish newspaper El País, his powerfully delivered comments at a debate at the International Club, a prestigious Lisbon cultural and social organisation last month, were greeted with thunderous applause and a part-standing ovation. Then, in a double page interview in the weekly newspaper Expresso in mid-December, Mr Baptista da Silva continued to denounce the government’s policies. That was followed by an interview for the radio station TSF, appearances in high-profile television debates and well-publicised meetings with trade union leaders to advise them on economic policies.
But it turns out that there was a tiny problem with Mr. da Silva’s resume. At least if “tiny” is the right way to describe a total fraud.
The only problem was that Mr Baptista da Silva is none of the above. He turned out to be a convicted forger with fake credentials and, following his spectacular hoodwinking of Portuguese society, he could soon face fraud charges. …in the country’s jails, Mr Baptista da Silva’s sudden appearance among the intellectual elite caused amazement among his former cellmates. …Mr Baptista da Silva’s comeuppance began when the UN confirmed to a Portuguese TV station last month that he did not work for the organisation, not even as a volunteer, as he later alleged. Further media investigations uncovered his prison record and fake university titles… Mr Baptista da Silva has now disappeared completely from public life, and there are reports he is under investigation for fraud charges by the police.
I guess if he was intentionally misrepresenting himself, that perhaps da Silva should go back to jail. Though a lot of real economists and almost all politicians should be in prison as well if that’s the standard.
Let me close by making a serious point. Economists do not hold some magic source of knowledge about public policy. So I’ve never objected when journalists, political scientists, laymen, and others engage in debates about economic policy.
The key to good economic analysis, as Bastiat explained in the 1800s, is looking at the seen and the unseen. And you don’t have to be an economist to recognize that the secondary and tertiary effects of public policy are very important.
Indeed, if Paul Krugman’s any indication, maybe it’s better not to be an economist.
[…] have a multi-part series on why people shouldn’t trust economists (see here, here, here, here, and […]
[…] you now understand why I have several columns based on why people should not trust […]
[…] you now understand why I have several columns based on why people should not trust […]
[…] P.S. While the moral of the story is that some economists make lots of mistakes because they overlook price theory, sometimes economists are explicit fraudsters. […]
[…] 2013, I wrote “Don’t Trust Economists, Part II” based on a remarkable example of fraud in […]
[…] have a terrible track record of predicting twists and turns in the economy. This is why I don’t make predictions and […]
[…] projecting a recession, but I don’t think that’s important for the simple fact that all economists are bad at making short-run economic […]
[…] inexactes1, je ne serais pas trop contrarié. Après tout, les économistes semblent avoir pour spécialité de se tromper sur l’avenir. Mon problème est que le FMI pousse à l’adoption de mauvaises […]
[…] all, economists seemingly specialize in getting the future wrong. My problem is that the IMF pushes bad […]
[…] all, economists seemingly specialize in getting the future wrong. My problem is that the IMF pushes bad […]
[…] No wonder fraudsters can easily pass themselves off as economists. […]
[…] No wonder fraudsters can easily pass themselves off as economists. […]
[…] Switching to a completely different topic, I’m the first to admit that economists are easy to mock, especially the ones who think they know enough to fine tune the […]
[…] Whereas the bad ones are easily confused with con artists. […]
[…] Whereas the bad ones are easily confused with con artists. […]
[…] be more specific, economists are no better than fortune tellers when trying to make short-run macroeconomic forecasts. Heck, if we actually knew what was going to happen over the next 12 months, we’d all be […]
When voter-lemmings become desperate over their decline in the world, they will latch on to any delusional perpetual motion machine thrown at them.
“God help us! You mean I have to actually compete with a billion plus Chinese, a billion Indians … etc. ? There’s got to be a simpler solution! There’s got to be a way for me to continue to enjoy a developed world privileged standard of living even though three billion emerging world people are catching up with me, rendering my competencies world average. So lets see what Paul Krugman has to say. Lets see whether his macroeconomic manipulations can turn the raw energy input of my average world competence into a sustained privileged developed world standard of living. In other words, lets see if there is a perpetual motion machine of prosperity. A perpetual motion machine that we– having Krugman– posses and others don’t “.
I’m no economist, but sorry to say pal, there ain’t such a thing. That is simply the predictable song that you will sing, that is the hope you ache to be given by the Krugmen (if there’s demand for false hope and bamboozling, then there will be Krugmen to supply it) as you are being flushed down the toilet.
To those who can see the forest for the trees, all these are simply sub-scenarios of the overriding theme: the western world is abandoning its values of individualism, replacing them with mandatory collectivism, while at the very same time three billion emerging world people have finally awakened to moving in the opposite direction. The more western world voter lemmings get stressed, the more they mandate huddling together, thus deepening the pace of their decline into a vicious cycle. Convergence will be swift, and that world will feel very different to the ninety nine percent who once were the world’s top fifteen percent. Prepare yourselves to live in a European mood. The European mood to come that is, which will be even more somber than the current one.
Americans? Well, they have chosen their own Shepard of Decline to entertain their false hopes and guide them through their Europeanization and Decline. On a historical time scale, its much closer than most think.
I enjoy reading your blog, so here goes a Portuguese language tip: it’s Mr. Silva, not Mr. da Silva. The “da“ isn’t part of his last name.
Reblogged this on This Got My Attention and commented:
Some economists definitely are frauds. 🙂
Don’t trust economists who believe they can predict some quantity in the future. Economists who stick to interpreting and educating, however, should be given an opportunity to earn one’s trust. 🙂