Wow. I wasn’t surprised to learn that the United States dropped in the new rankings unveiled today in Economic Freedom of the World.
But I’m somewhat shocked to learn that we fell from 10th last year all the way down to 18th this year, as can be seen on the chart (click to enlarge).
Last year, the U.S. fell from 7th to 10th, and I though dropping three spots was bad. But falling by eight spots this past year is a stunning decline.
Who would have thought that Scandinavian welfare states such as Denmark and Finland would rank higher than the United States? Or that Ireland, with all its problems, would be above America?
But since I’m not a misery-loves-company guy, I’m happy to see some nations doing well. I’ve previously highlighted the good policies in Hong Kong and Singapore. And I’ve trumpeted the good policies in Switzerland and Australia, as well as Canada, Chile, and Estonia.
So kudos to the leaders in those nations.
American politicians, by contrast, deserve scorn. Let’s update the chart I posted when last year’s report was issued.
As you can see, it’s an understatement to say that the United States is heading in the wrong direction. We’re still considerably ahead of interventionist welfare states such as France and Italy, though I’m afraid to think about what the U.S. score will be five years from now.
Here’s what the authors of the report had to say about America’s decline.
The United States, long considered the standard bearer for economic freedom among large industrial nations, has experienced a substantial decline in economic freedom during the past decade. From 1980 to 2000, the United States was generally rated the third freest economy in the world, ranking behind only Hong Kong and Singapore. After increasing steadily during the period from 1980 to 2000, the chainlinked EFW rating of the United States fell from 8.65 in 2000 to 8.21 in 2005 and 7.70 in 2010. The chain-linked ranking of the United States has fallen precipitously from second in 2000 to eighth in 2005 and 19th in 2010 (unadjusted ranking of 18th).
For those interested in why the United States has dropped, the “size of government” score has fallen from 8.65 in 2000 to 7.70 in the latest report. That’s not a surprise since the burden of government spending has exploded during the Bush-Obama years.
But the trade score also dropped significantly over the same period, from 8.78 to 7.65. So the protectionists should be happy, even though the rest of us have less prosperity.
The most dramatic decline, though, was the in the “legal system and property rights” category, where the U.S. plummeted from 9.23 in 2000 down to 7.12 in the new report. We’re not quite Argentina (3.76!), to be sure, but the trend is very troubling.
[…] cited the EFW Index many times, particularly to bemoan how America’s score has deteriorated during the Bush-Obama […]
[…] about providing some evidence that Obama’s making America more like Europe? Well, just check out the data from the latest Economic Freedom of the World annual […]
[…] by the Fraser Institute. The good news is that the United States is in the top 10 (we dropped as low as #18 during Obama’s first […]
[…] good news is that America had dropped as low as #18, so we’ve been improving the past few […]
[…] bad news is that the United States has taken a dive in the wrong direction in these […]
[…] is one of the reasons why Canada now ranks higher than the United States in both Economic Freedom of the World and the Index of Economic […]
[…] you look at measures (such as the Fraser Institute’s Economic Freedom of the World index) of what makes a nation competitive and prosperous, you’ll find some obvious variables such as fiscal policy, trade openness, regulatory burden, […]
[…] also has too much red tape and government intervention, which helps to explain why it lags other European nations such as Denmark and Estonia in the Economic Freedom of the World […]
[…] it’s flat tax) has a very statist economic system – ranking only 126th in the Economic Freedom of the World index, maybe a bit of internal competition would trigger some much-needed […]
[…] that the United States is becoming more like Europe. During the Bush-Obama years, we’ve seen big increases in the size and scope of government, and it’s no surprise that we’re now suffering from anemic economic […]
[…] But to the extent we become more like France and less like Hong Kong, we are doomed to get anemic economic performance and fall in the competitiveness rankings. […]
[…] n’est pas étonnant que le Canada soit désormais bien mieux placé en termes de liberté […]
[…] if you look at how America scores in that regard (corruption measures are included in both Economic Freedom of the World and the Index of Economic Freedom), the problem is much less […]
[…] if you look at how America scores in that regard (corruption measures are included in both Economic Freedom of the World and the Index of Economic Freedom), the problem is much less […]
[…] about providing some evidence that Obama’s making America more like Europe? Well, just check out the data from the latest Economic Freedom of the World annual […]
[…] imposed a larger burden of government, it’s no surprise that the United States has fallen in both major global measures of economic […]
[…] wonder Canada is now much higher than the United States in measures of economic […]
[…] we have to ask ourselves why did so many workers leave the labor market? Was it the overall increase in the burden of government? The increase in the minimum wage? The disability scam? Subsidized unemployment? The welfare […]
[…] wonder Canada is now much higher than the United States in measures of economic […]
[…] we have to ask ourselves why did so many workers leave the labor market? Was it the overall increase in the burden of government? The increase in the minimum wage? The disability scam? Subsidized unemployment? The welfare […]
[…] wonder Canada is now much higher than the United States in measures of economic […]
[…] the Fraser Institute’s Economic Freedom of the World and the World Economic Forum’s Global Competitiveness Report, the Index is a broad measure of […]
[…] think-tank located in Canada). It is to our great shame and against our economic interests that Canada has actually surpassed the United States on most metrics of economic freedom. We sometimes delude ourselves in the US in […]
[…] I’ve already acknowledged that Canada has passed the United States in the Economic Freedom of the World […]
[…] the way, it’s a bit depressing that Denmark actually ranks higher than the United States in the most recent Economic Freedom of the World […]
[…] quand nous avons des exemples de pays qui sont désormais plus prospères que les États-Unis, et qui mènent le monde en mobilisant les recettes éprouvées de l’État minimal et du marché […]
[…] when we have examples of jurisdictions that are now more prosperous than the United States and they lead the world in maintaining the tried-and-true recipe of free markets and small […]
[…] place in the overall Economic Freedom of the World rankings when Bill Clinton left office to 18th place in the most recent rankings, so the trend obviously isn’t very […]
[…] place in the overall Economic Freedom of the World rankings when Bill Clinton left office to 18th place in the most recent rankings, so the trend obviously isn’t very […]
[…] 3rd place in the overall Economic Freedom of the World rankings when Bill Clinton left office to 18th place in the most recent rankings, so the trend obviously isn’t very […]
[…] place in the overall Economic Freedom of the World rankings when Bill Clinton left office to 18th place in the most recent rankings, so the trend obviously isn’t very […]
[…] place in the overall Economic Freedom of the World rankings when Bill Clinton left office to 18th place in the most recent rankings, so the trend obviously isn’t very […]
[…] je me demande si les bons scores de la Suisse (4e), de Hong Kong (1er) et de Singapour (2e) sur l’index de liberté économique du monde ont un lien avec leur prospérité ? Ceci est bien entendu une question rhétorique. La […]
[…] je me demande si les bons scores de la Suisse (4e), de Hong Kong (1er) et de Singapour (2e) sur l'index de liberté économique du monde ont un lien avec leur prospérité ? Ceci est bien entendu une question rhétorique. La […]
[…] I wonder if the fact that Switzerland (#4), Hong Kong (#1), and Singapore (#2) score highly on the Economic Freedom of the World index has any connection with their comparative […]
[…] Obama Administration, by contrast, is moving the United States in the wrong direction at faster pace, so the last thing the Germans need is advice from Treasury Secretary Lew or anyone else associated […]
[…] The best role models are still Hong Kong and Singapore, and it’s no coincidence that those two jurisdictions regularly dominate the top two spots in the Economic Freedom of the World rankings. […]
[…] The United States Plummets to 18th in New Economic Freedom of the World Rankings […]
[…] by contrast, basically has continued Bush’s policies of intervention and bigger government. No wonder we’re suffering a multi-trillion dollar output […]
[…] mean the BRIC and MIST nations deserve high praise. Many of them still get poor scores from Economic Freedom of the World, largely because the regulatory burden is excessive and also because more needs to be done to […]
[…] Which is why the Freedom Index is a good complement to Economic Freedom of the World. […]
[…] about providing some evidence that Obama’s making America more like Europe? Well, just check out the data from the latest Economic Freedom of the World annual […]
[…] about providing some evidence that Obama’s making America more like Europe? Well, just check out the data from the latest Economic Freedom of the World annual […]
[…] And I like it even when it gives me bad news. It’s somewhat depressing, after all, to read that the United States has dropped from the #3 nation when Bill Clinton left office to the #18 country in the most recent index. […]
[…] And I like it even when it gives me bad news. It’s somewhat depressing, after all, to read that the United States has dropped from the #3 nation when Bill Clinton left office to the #18 country in the most recent index. […]
And just look at the ranking of Singapore in this all inclusive rating. All hail Lee Kuan Yew!
[…] And I like it even when it gives me bad news. It’s somewhat depressing, after all, to read that the United States has dropped from the #3 nation when Bill Clinton left office to the #18 country in the most recent index. […]
[…] don’t actually think we’re as bad as France, and the rankings from both Economic Freedom of the World and the Index of Economic Freedom both show the United States with more economic […]
[…] The United States Plummets to 18th in New Economic Freedom of the World Rankings […]
[…] a big-picture look at economic policy, the Economic Freedom of the World is the best ranking, though the Index of Economic Freedom is also quite good, and the Global […]
[…] a big-picture look at economic policy, the Economic Freedom of the World is the best ranking, though the Index of Economic Freedom is also quite good, and the Global […]
[…] a big-picture look at economic policy, the Economic Freedom of the World is the best ranking, though the Index of Economic Freedom is also quite good, and the Global […]
[…] a big-picture look at economic policy, the Economic Freedom of the World is the best ranking, though the Index of Economic Freedom is also quite good, and the Global […]
[…] a big-picture look at economic policy, the Economic Freedom of the World is the best ranking, though the Index of Economic Freedom is also quite good, and the Global […]
[…] the United States has dropped in the Economic Freedom of the World Index and the World Economic Forum’s Global Competitiveness Report, it’s nice to see that the news […]
[…] the United States has dropped in the Economic Freedom of the World Index and the World Economic Forum’s Global Competitiveness Report, it’s nice to see that the […]
[…] But he should be held at least somewhat accountable for an anemic recovery. Particularly since he promised “hope” and “change” and then continued the big-spending, pro-cronyism policies of the Bush years. […]
[…] But he should be held at least somewhat accountable for an anemic recovery. Particularly since he promised “hope” and “change” and then continued the big-spending, pro-cronyism policies of the Bush years. […]
[…] https://danieljmitchell.wordpress.com/2012/09/18/the-united-states-plummets-to-18th-in-new-economic-f…Related posts:Komen for the Cure's agenda of deception blasted by British scientistsWhy doctors are more dangerous than gunsPeter Schiff Opens Hard-Money BankMassachusetts: Police Cannot Search Nervous MotoristsIs Gold Money? LCH Accepts Shiny Yellow Metal As CollateralWoman dies after genital kick from LAPD officerN.H. State Rep Views Bitcoin As Legitimate Currency CompetitorThe Road to World War 3New Public Safety Broadband Network: Tool For A Domestic Secret Police? Police Shoot Dog & Police Dept Says Case ‘Closed.’Evolution of the IMF Is Directed HistoryBefore UN Speech, Argentine President meets with SorosAdventures in Legal Land with Marc Stevens (2004)Undocumented activist reporter arrested in MinnesotaGreek Men On 'Lagarde List' Found Dead This entry was posted in Alternative News and tagged Bailout Fail, Bankocracy, Economics, Investment, Land Of The Flea, Taxation Without Constitution, Welfare-Warfare State by admin. Bookmark the permalink. […]
[…] Card is a great resource document, enabling apples-to-apples comparisons among states, just as the Economic Freedom of the World makes it easy to compare nations. Share this:TumblrTwitterEmailPrintFacebookLike this:LikeBe the first to like this. « […]
[…] Card is a great resource document, enabling apples-to-apples comparisons among states, just as the Economic Freedom of the World makes it easy to compare nations. Rate this:Share this:PrintEmailFacebookTwitterMoredeliciousDiggFarkLinkedInRedditStumbleUponLike […]
[…] But maybe Canada is the place to go. It’s now the 5th-freest economy in the world, while the United States has dropped to 18th place. […]
[…] “But maybe Canada is the place to go. It’s now the 5th-freest economy in the world, while the United States has dropped to 18th place.” […]
France???
[…] But maybe Canada is the place to go. It’s now the 5th-freest economy in the world, while the United States has dropped to 18th place. […]
[…] But maybe Canada is the place to go. It’s now the 5th-freest economy in the world, while the United States has dropped to 18th place. […]
The biggest concern: One party or the other will see this as justification for declaring war on 17 other countries…
Sloppy graphing takes much from your otherwise important comment. Your graph was difference from a position of third, I think. Then the current position should be -15, not -18.
Reblogged this on News You May Have Missed and commented:
The United States Plummets to 18th in New Economic Freedom of the World Rankings
Once you are in the deadly embrace of the vicious cycle, it is nearly impossible to escape. It is all momentum from now on. Economic distress? Voters will head to the polls for more “help”. So even the rankings are pointing to the fact that decline not only continues, but seems to be accelerating.
BTW, HopNChange reads these rankings backwards, so expect further declines in the future. The point of no return passed long ago for Americans.
America haters throughout the world must be rejoicing that America has finally stepped on the same banana peel of mandatory collectivism. Not only is America becoming more Socialist but is declining too! A win-win for leftist America haters. Meanwhile, American voter lemmings will continue their death march, like many other peoples before them. Different flags, new slogans but same path to self-destruction: Mandatory collectivism. Naive Americans oblivious to the fact that the same sirens if HopNChange and its shortcuts to a more compassionate prosperity have bamboozled many one cultures before them into mediocrity.
While decline is certain, the details are more difficult to predict. Like I have noted before, a pot to which heat is applied will boil. Predicting when it will boil is a little more difficult. Predicting HOW it will boil, where the first bubbles will appear and how they will interact with other bubbles is virtually impossible to predict. But one thing is certain, the pot will sure boil. Likewise, a country that is rejecting its unique historically serendipitous individualism and starts mimiking the rest of the world in the mandatory collectivism that is the norm in most other places, will also converge economically to average worldwide prosperity levels.
I don’t think we’ll become Greece, like Mr Mitchell often says, perhaps figuratively to make a point. I see America’s future at an equilibrium point between France and Argentina. Of course, France is already entering the next phase towards Greecificatoon, so ultimately Mr Mitchell is right. But there is another reason Mr Mitchell may be literally right when it comes to Greecefication. The pace of decline of the US is so precipitous that decline momentum may blow past the Franco-Argentinian equilibrium stage, straight into Greece. But I think at some point some modest remedial action will be taken, so some deceleration will occur, so I still vote for the Franco-Argentine equilibrium era scenario which will last a few years.
The next major event in the decline is likely to be a spiraling loss of credibility on US debt, at which point we will get something like VAT almost overnight, cementing our Francification trajectory.
But in any case, “Let’s HOPE the CHANGE will be Franco-Argentina and not Greece!”: That describes the pathetic state of the American electorate and it’s rejection of the very American values of individualism that once propelled this country to the forefront of prosperity. Hopefully, other countries (hopefully bigger than mere city states like Hong-Kong and Singapore) will pick up the baton. If not, we may all end up in an OECD jail, and then we’ll really get to meet Mr. Mitchell.
OK, I admit that there was a moment of schadenfreude due to the fact that I now live in a country more free than the US. That moment ended when I saw that that’s because the US has become less free, not because Estonia has become more free, most recently.
The big story seems to be the decline of the Anglosphere: it used to be that 5 or 6 of the top 10 in the efw were English-speaking countries. Now it’s just 3. Still, the other 3 are in the top 20, and they can recover with some hard work and determination.
NB: the 2012 index actually reports on the situation in 2010. The current situation in the US and UK is likely to be even worse.
Reblogged this on The Conservative New Ager.