There are very serious ways to save huge amounts of money from the defense budget, largely by making smarter choices about defining America’s national security.
This obviously involves high-profile decisions about whether it is smart to engage in nation-building in Iraq and Afghanistan. But it also involves what seem to be “gimme” choices about whether we should be spending tens of billions of dollars to maintain troops in places such as Germany, the United Kingdom, South Korea, and Japan.
And, sometimes, it’s just the simple fact that bureaucracies like to squander money. Here’s a $600,000 boondoggle that barely rises to the level of a rounding error in the Defense Department’s budget, but it is a nauseating example of how government wastes our money in genuinely spectacular ways. Every time some politician says we need to raise taxes, you should think of this piece of you-know-what and say #*&@;^ No!
Here are the key passages from a U.S. News and World Report story.
A $600,000 frog sculpture that lights up, gurgles “sounds of nature” and carries a 10-foot fairy girl on its back could soon be greeting Defense Department employees who plan to start working at the $700 million Mark Center in Alexandria, Va. this fall. That is unless a new controversy over the price tag of the public art doesn’t torpedo the idea. Decried as wasteful spending that will be seen by just a couple thousand of daily workers who arrive on bus shuttles, foes have tried to delay the decision, expected tomorrow, April 1. But in an E-mail, an Army Corps of Engineers official said that the decision can’t be held up because it would impact completion of the huge project. …The Mark Center is one of the facilities that thousands of defense workers will be reporting to as part of the Base Realignment and Closure plan, or BRAC, that is shifting workers around Virginia and Maryland. The BRAC plan itself has been criticized as wasteful.
[…] helpful if supporters of a strong military opposed some of the many ways that politicians insert waste, fraud, inefficiency, and pork in the Pentagon’s […]
[…] be helpful if supporters of a strong military opposed some of the many ways that politicians insert waste, fraud, inefficiency, and pork in the Pentagon’s […]
[…] And if you want other examples of military waste, click here, here, and here. […]
[…] And if you want other examples of military waste, click here, here, and here. […]
[…] would rank the presidents, which is a simple exercise because all that’s required is to remove military spending. Here are the numbers showing the average inflation-adjusted increase in overall domestic outlays […]
[…] bothered to do any research, they would have found numerous columns on Pentagon waste, including here, here, here, here, and […]
[…] is even worse than the bizarre $600,000 frog statue than the Defense Department selected to adorn a new $700 million office […]
[…] is even worse than the bizarre $600,000 frog statue than the Defense Department selected to adorn a new $700 million office […]
Are we talking about the Mark Center in it’s entirety or just the statue?
Does this remind anyone of the episode of Family Guy when Mayor West wastes a fortune on a solid gold statue of the “Dig em’!” character from the old TV cereal ads and tries to divert attention by banning gay marriage in Quahog?
[…] is even worse than the bizarre $600,000 frog statue than the Defense Department selected to adorn a new $700 million office […]
[…] is even worse than the bizarre $600,000 frog statue than the Defense Department selected to adorn a new $700 million office […]
[…] That’s why I get especially irritated when I read horror stories about Pentagon waste. […]
[…] There is plenty of waste in the military budget. […]
[…] There is plenty of waste in the military budget. […]
[…] it means we shouldn’t spend huge sums of money to defend South Korea, which is far richer and stronger than its crazy northern […]
And Obama just said yesterday that he wants a “smart, lean and accountable” government. Yeah right.
April 1st?