Like most libertarians, I’m a bit quirky.
Most people, if they watch The Great Escape or Rambo II, cheer when American POWs achieve freedom.
I’m happy as well, but I also can’t stop myself from thinking about how I also applaud when a successful taxpayer flees from a high-tax state to a low-tax state.
It’s like an escape from oppression to freedom, though I confess it might not be the best plot for a blockbuster movie.
In any event, here are two recent feel-good stories about this phenomenon.
Here’s a report about two members of the establishment media who are protecting their family’s finances from greedy Connecticut politicians.
After reports that married MSNBC anchors Joe Scarborough and Mika Brzezinski have been mysteriously broadcasting their show from Florida — sources speculated that the location is to benefit Scarborough’s tax situation. The “Morning Joe” anchors have been reportedly on a home set in Jupiter, Fla., but using Washington, DC, backdrops.
Sources said the reason for the locale was a “tax dodge” — albeit a completely legal one — since Scarborough has a home in Florida and would need to spend a certain amount of the time there for any tax benefit. …Scarborough, who’s still presently registered to vote in Connecticut., on Oct. 9, 2018 registered to vote in Palm Beach County, Fla. according to public records. …By moving to Florida, he’d reduce his tax burden by roughly $550,000. Scarborough reportedly makes $8 million a year and would pay 6.99-percent state income tax in Connecticut, while there’s no state income tax in Florida, the Post’s Josh Kosman reports. To qualify as a Florida resident, he’d need to be there 183 days a year.
According to the story, Scarborough and Brzezinski are only making the move to be close to aging parents.
That certainly may be part of the story, but I am 99.99 percent confident that they won’t be filing another tax return with the Taxnut State…oops, I mean Nutmeg State.
Meanwhile, another billionaire is escaping from parasitic politicians in New York and moving to zero-income tax in Florida.
Billionaire Carl Icahn is planning to move his home and business to Florida to avoid New York’s higher taxes, according to people familiar with the matter. …The move is scheduled for March 31 and employees who don’t do so won’t have a job… Hedge fund billionaires have relocated to Florida for tax reasons for years —
David Tepper, Paul Tudor Jones and Eddie Lampert being among the most prominent. But Florida officials have been aggressively pushing Miami as a destination for money managers since the Republican-led tax overhaul. …Florida is one of seven states without a personal income tax, while New York’s top rate is 8.82%. Florida’s corporate tax rate is 5.5%, compared with 6.5% in New York. Icahn’s move was reported earlier by the New York Post. The difference could mean dramatic savings for Icahn, who is the world’s 47th richest person.
These two stories are only anecdotes. And without comprehensive data, there’s no way of knowing if they are part of a trend.
That’s why the IRS website that reports the interstate movement of money is so useful (it’s not often I give the IRS a compliment!). You can peruse data showing what states are losing income and what states are gaining income.
Though if you want a user-friendly way of viewing the data, I strongly recommend How Money Walks. That website allows you to create maps showing the net change in income and where the income is coming from, or going to.
Since our first story was about Connecticut, here’s a map showing that the Nutmeg State has suffered a net exodus (red is bad) over the 1992-2016 period.
In other words, the state is suffering from fiscal decay.
And here’s a map for New York, where we see the same story.
Now let’s look at the state that is reaping a windfall thanks to tax refugees.
Florida, to put it mildly, is kicking New York’s derrière (green is good).
And you can see on the left side that Florida is also attracting lots of taxpayers from New Jersey, Illinois, Pennsylvania, and Connecticut.
By the way, some of my leftist friends claim this internal migration is driven by weather. I suspect that’s a partial factor, but I always ask them why people (and their money) are also migrating out of California, where the weather is even better.
P.S. Tax migration is part of tax competition, and it’s a big reason why left-wing governments sometimes feel compelled to lower taxes.
P.P.S. When the IRS releases data for 2017 and 2018, I’m guessing we’ll see even more people escaping to Florida, in large part because there’s now a limit on deducting state and local taxes.
P.P.P.S. I also cheer when people escape high-tax nations.
[…] A resident of New York or California, for instance, will face a much higher top tax rate than a resident of a zero-income-tax state such as Texas or Florida. […]
[…] A resident of New York or California, for instance, will face a much higher top tax rate than a resident of a zero-income-tax state such as Texas or Florida. […]
[…] And athletes also make decisions based on tax policy. Here’s a tweet about Tyreek Hill, one of the best wide receivers in the National Football League. When deciding which team to sign with for this year, he picked the Miami Dolphins, located in a state with no income tax. […]
[…] And athletes also make decisions based on tax policy. Here’s a tweet about Tyreek Hill, one of the best wide receivers in the National Football League. When deciding which team to sign with for this year, he picked the Miami Dolphins, located in a state with no income tax. […]
[…] written many columns about the migration from high-tax states to low-tax […]
[…] low levels of government spending, way below Alabama. Including other southern states such as Florida and Texas, not just places like South Dakota and New […]
[…] low levels of government spending, way below Alabama. Including other southern states such as Florida and Texas, not just places like South Dakota and New […]
[…] low levels of government spending, way below Alabama. Including other southern states such as Florida and Texas, not just places like South Dakota and New […]
[…] low levels of government spending, way below Alabama. Including other southern states such as Florida and Texas, not just places like South Dakota and New […]
[…] low levels of government spending, way below Alabama. Including other southern states such as Florida and Texas, not just places like South Dakota and New […]
[…] secondo punto è una importante ragione per cui così tanti contribuenti sono già fuggiti da New York e si sono trasferiti in stati con una migliore politica fiscale (in particolare, la […]
[…] second item is a big reason why so many taxpayers already have escaped New York and moved to states with better tax policy (most notably, […]
[…] second item is a big reason why so many taxpayers already have escaped New York and moved to states with better tax policy (most […]
[…] second item is a big reason why so many taxpayers already have escaped New York and moved to states with better tax policy (most […]
[…] second item is a big reason why so many taxpayers already have escaped New York and moved to states with better tax policy (most […]
[…] second item is a big reason why so many taxpayers already have escaped New York and moved to states with better tax policy (most […]
[…] second item is a big reason why so many taxpayers already have escaped New York and moved to states with better tax policy (most […]
[…] second item is a big reason why so many taxpayers already have escaped New York and moved to states with better tax policy (most notably, […]
[…] second item is a big reason why so many taxpayers already have escaped New York and moved to states with better tax policy (most notably, […]
[…] examining state public policy, big jurisdictions such as California, Texas, New York, and Florida get a lot of […]
[…] for good policy. Bad news for states like New Jersey and nations such as France. Good news for Florida and […]
[…] results sometimes matched expectations. Florida generally looked very responsible, for instance, while New York looked rather […]
[…] a taxpayer, Florida is the easy winner – which may explain why so many productive people are leaving the Empire State and permanently migrating to the Sunshine […]
[…] Governor Cuomo is worried about rich people moving to Florida (and he should be), he should lower tax rates and make government more […]
[…] and business owners can save a massive amount of money by escaping states such as New York and moving to zero-income-tax states such as […]
[…] isn’t the only factor that drives migration between states, but it’s clear that lower-tax states tend to attract more migration, while higher-tax states tend to drive people […]
[…] ability to reduce their tax burdens if they make wise decisions on where to live (such as Texas or Florida in the case of the United […]
[…] The only possible advice I have for state residents is to move. Florida would be a good choice. […]
[…] As such, I would drop Wyoming and Alaska in the rankings and instead put South Dakota at #1 and Florida at […]
[…] that California taxpayers increasingly opted to move to states with no income tax, such as Florida, Nevada, […]
[…] learn that California taxpayers increasingly opted to move to states with no income tax, such as Florida, Nevada, […]
[…] learn that California taxpayers increasingly opted to move to states with no income tax, such as Florida, Nevada, […]
[…] learn that California taxpayers increasingly opted to move to states with no income tax, such as Florida, Nevada, […]
[…] to learn that California taxpayers increasingly opted to move to states with no income tax, such as Florida, Nevada, and […]
I read the joke about Texas, California and the coyote with grimness (I reside here for the moment). However I regret to inform you that CA has “progressed” since then. There is no longer that $75,000 retraining fee for the security officer. No, CA is now “woke”.
First, there is the hiring of additional counselors for all university campuses. ($250,000/year each) This is followed by the creation of two unique “safe spaces” at least 1/4 mile apart – this is to accommodate both those students who are triggered by how close the coyote came to being mistreated by their government, as well as those students who are triggered by the death of the officer’s dog.
Universities will have a new curriculum on each campus “understanding the coyote plight”. This will require the hiring of more professors. (again, starting at $250,000 each)
Next, a law was passed requiring that all businesses with 3 or more employees provide 10 hours of coyote sensitivity training to each employee, and submit annual compliance forms to a newly created branch of government. These new government employees will ensure that every business follows the new rules and to do so, they are provided with swat teams using those hollow point bullets you mentioned, for their midnight raids on business owner’s homes.
Then there is the establishment of a multi-year study of the implications of modern encroachment on coyote territory. This is ultimately to determine which property owners should have their property forcibly forfeited under “eminent domain”, to alleviate the coyote suffering.
Isn’t ironic that a GOP governor in Connecticut fostered that state’s precipitous decline by promoting and signing into law…a state income tax. That governor was Lowell Wicker.
Rush moved to Florida several years ago for the same reason. New York hassled him for years afterward. Maybe still do.
You would think that some of the politicians in the high tax states would get the message. As Ron White says “you can’t fix stupid.”
the worst is yet to come… current policies and fiscal pressures will add to the taxpayer exodus… the socialists holding office in the U.S. have the same objectives they had in Venezuela… we can only hope that we have sufficient structural safeguards in place to prevent a similar result… perhaps Florida should be prepared for an unprecedented population surge…
“The city of Chicago is in dire fiscal and financial straits with an almost billion dollar budget deficit, bonds rated at junk status or below, numerous extremely costly legal judgments, a shrinking tax base, and unfunded public pension liabilities to the tune of an astonishing $42 billion.”
“Will Chicago Be the Largest U.S. City to Declare Bankruptcy?”
BY RICK MORAN SEPTEMBER 14, 2019
https://pjmedia.com/trending/will-chicago-be-the-largest-u-s-city-to-declare-bankruptcy/