I don’t like to spend much time commenting on media bias. But every so often I find an example that cries out for attention.
In previous posts, I’ve discussed this slanted AP story on poverty, the Brian Ross Tea Party slur, this example of implicit bias by USA Today, and a Reuters report on job creation and so-called stimulus.
And I’ve also commented on a Washington Post story that turned a spending cut molehill into a “spending slash” mountain, a silly assertion in the New York Times that education spending has been reduced, and a Washington post claim that Germany is fiscally conservative.
The latest example comes from the Associated Press, which is mystified that crime is falling “despite” record firearm sales.
Gun-related violence has fallen steadily since 2006 in Virginia despite record firearm sales, according to a university professor’s analysis. Virginia Commonwealth University professor Thomas R. Baker compared state crime data from 2006 through 2011 with gun-dealer sales estimates obtained by the Richmond Times-Dispatch. Baker’s analysis shows the number of gun purchases soared 73 percent in the six-year period, while gun-related violent crimes fell 24 percent. Baker, who specializes in research methods and criminology theory, said the comparison seems to contradict the premise that more guns lead to more crime in Virginia.
Gee, there are more innocent people with guns and people are surprised that criminals are now more reluctant to commit crimes? I guess you have to be a reporter or an academic to be surprised by this common-sense observation.
John Lott, of course, wrote an entire book called More Guns, Less Crime. It’s very much worth reading. These posts will give you a flavor of his analysis:
- He punctures myths about so-called assault weapons.
- Lott explained how anti-gun laws facilitated the terrorist attack at Fort Hood.
- Writing after the Tucson shootings, Lott explained the benefits of concealed-carry laws.
- In the aftermath of the Heller decision, Lott explained how more guns resulted in less crime in DC.
- Lott explained how gun control made Jamaica a more dangerous country.
Shifting back to the topic of media bias, let’s close this post by sharing some amusing cartoons, which can be enjoyed here, here, and here.
[…] For what it’s worth, this is both amusing and true. […]
[…] For what it’s worth, this is both amusing and true. […]
[…] For what it’s worth, this is both amusing and true. […]
[…] For what it’s worth, this is both amusing and true. […]
[…] For what it’s worth, this is both amusing and true. […]
[…] But the more relevant point from the discussion is that there has been a huge increase in gun ownership in the United States in recent decades. And that increase in gun ownership has coincided with a big drop in violent crime. […]
[…] But the more relevant point from the discussion is that there has been a huge increase in gun ownership in the United States in recent decades. And that increase in gun ownership has coincided with a big drop in violent crime. […]
[…] For what it’s worth, this is both amusing and true. […]
[…] For what it’s worth, this is both amusing and true. […]
[…] For what it’s worth, this is both amusing and true. […]
[…] Source: Only the Media Is Baffled by the Notion that More Guns Lead to Less Crime | International Liberty […]
[…] For what it’s worth, this is both amusing and true. […]
[…] For what it’s worth, this is both amusing and true. […]
[…] remember that life is much better for criminals when there are fewer guns in the hands of law-abiding […]
[…] advocates of gun control will make society less safe if they succeed in disarming law-abiding […]
[…] Though he seems puzzled by the fact that more gun ownership is associated with less crime. […]
[…] I believe in private gun ownership, because I respect the Constitution, because I want to discourage crime, because I support liberty, and because I believe in the right of self-defense in case society goes […]
[…] a safer society. Criminals and other bad people are less likely to engage in mayhem if they know potential victims can defend themselves. And I also think that there’s a greater-than-zero chance that bad government policy […]
[…] such a fascist law would not be the criminals. So the net effect of such legislation would be an unfortunate shift in the ratio of good gun owners and bad gun […]
[…] such a fascist law would not be the criminals. So the net effect of such legislation would be an unfortunate shift in the ratio of good gun owners and bad gun […]
[…] levels of gun ownership are correlated with lower levels of […]
[…] they argue guns cause crime, what is their response to the link between expanded gun ownership or decreases in violent […]
[…] vouch for every factoid, but based on what I’ve previously shared (see here, here, here, and here), I would be quite surprised if this information isn’t […]
[…] resist the temptation to comment when I come across egregious examples on issues such as poverty, guns, Greece, jobs, taxes, and […]
[…] maybe, just maybe, the problem isn’t guns. Indeed, perhaps we can draw the conclusion that society will be safer if more good people are […]
[…] maybe, just maybe, the problem isn’t guns. Indeed, perhaps we can draw the conclusion that society will be safer if more good people are […]
[…] and over again, I’ve shared evidence showing that gun ownership deters […]
[…] and over again, I’ve shared evidence showing that gun ownership deters […]
[…] Only the Media Is Baffled by the Notion that More Guns Lead to Less Crime […]
[…] Only the Media Is Baffled by the Notion that More Guns Lead to Less Crime […]
[…] This is a nation where you can own a tank or a machine gun, and it’s a country where there are probably more guns than people. […]
[…] This is a nation where you can own a tank or a machine gun, and it’s a country where there are probably more guns than people. […]
[…] other words, ordinary Americans have a lot more common sense than the buffoons in the media. They know that you get less crime when you increase the expected cost of criminal […]
[…] other words, ordinary Americans have a lot more common sense than the buffoons in the media. They know that you get less crime when you increase the expected cost of criminal […]
[…] Some anti-gun control messaging from the Associated Press […]
Rudy Giuliani attributes his use of gun control to bring the crime rate in New York way, way down, from the highest crime rate in the country to the safest large city in the country. The more guns he took off the street, the lower the crime rate. I’m not suggesting that means we need to ban all guns, but it certainly contradicts the idea that more guns makes for a safer country. We already have more guns per person by far, than any other nation in the world, and a gun homicide rate that is on average, 20 times higher than other developed nations. If your assertion was correct, we’d have the lowest gun homicide rate in the world.
So the media aren’t the only ones who are baffled by your specious conclusions. You also make a dangerous assumption that correlation equals causation. There is no proof of your claims, of a causal link between more guns and fewer crimes, and until you ask criminals and they answer overwhelmingly that they aren’t committing crimes because they fear that civilians are armed, your entire argument is on thin ice. The facts simply don’t support your conclusions without cherry-picking the hell out of the research.
Giuliani also cites FBI data to back up his stance. I’ll leave you with a quote from the man, who was a favorite of many conservatives in his bid for president:
“We need a federal law that bans all assault weapons. The United States Congress needs to pass uniform licensing for everyone carrying a gun.”
[…] Some anti-gun control messaging from the Associated Press […]
Write more, thats all I have to say. Literally, it seems as though you relied on the
video to make your point. You obviously know what youre talking about, why throw away
your intelligence on just posting videos to your weblog when you could be giving us something enlightening to
read?
[…] this is news to the partisan media? <shakes […]
I love it when folks come together and share ideas.
Great website, stick with it!
Britain was once a safe place.
But decades of gun bans and enforced victimhood has made it shockingly bad.
Face-to-face violent crime is now 133% higher per capita in the UK than the US. A startling 26% of Britons are victims of crime each year.
And in the US,criminals, in order to avoid armed citizens, have increased car and unoccupied home thefts to compensate.
[…] the media morons are baffled by the notion. Must be something in the water in […]
Gun control has NEVER been about reducing crime, but about the disenfranchisement of free human beings.
Crime is simply the canard, the cover story, the scam used by people who want to enslave us. The idea of ordinary human beings freely pursuing their own interests is abhorrent to them. They want a world full of people who are controlled.
As Mao famously said, political power comes from the barrel of a gun. When ordinary people have the individual power to resist tyranny and to deal death to would-be tyrants, they are impossible to enslave. The most you can do is kill them, which is beyond the grasp of would-be tyrants until after they’ve established their tyranny.
The right to keep and bear arms is nothing less than the last best defense of liberty and justice in this world. Hence the reason the left is so keen on taking guns away.
Those who would disarm you are the same as those who would disenfranchise you. Do not be fooled.
The malfeasant media has become so far detached from reality, they may as well be aliens from another planet.
Which is why we’re past the whole “reasoned debate” and “peaceful resolution” in this country. brian.
[…] Thanks to a link at Instapundit, I found a Dan Mitchell post with the obvious truth that the media is baffled that more guns lead to less crime. […]
@Brian has got it right on the nail.
They believe, which means they have not checked out its truth for themselves. Notice that the word believe – be-lie-ve contains the word “lie”! Believers are always deceived because there’s no inner power in believing. They’re just insisting they’re right, despite all the evidence to the contrary – aka being right.
[…] STORY HERE […]
Definitely looks like they’re trying to dodge reality on this one.
FYI for anyone who wants a free one-stop source on evidence against any gun control argument, check out the following:
Click to access gun_facts_6_1_screen.pdf
Whenever you point out that common-sense conclusion to someone who has always believed otherwise, their response usually relies on emotion and something like faith. They just KNOW that things can’t be so.
[…] “Despite” = so-called “journalists” reject cause and effect. Only the Media Is Baffled by the Notion that More Guns Lead to Less Crime « International Liberty. […]