The old joke in Washington is that Democrats are the evil party and Republicans are the stupid party (which is why you should guard your wallet and freedom whenever you hear talk of “bipartisanship”).
The GOP definitely is doing what it can to prove that at least one side of that joke is true. Republicans are actually talking about letting the debt limit increase in exchange for a vote on a balanced budget amendment.
Yes, you read correctly. They’re not talking about an increase in the debt limit in exchange for a balanced budget, or more borrowing authority in exchange for passage of a balanced budget amendment. Instead, they will roll over for the very low price of simply getting a vote on a proposed amendment.
Here’s a passage from a report in Human Events.
The Senate Republicans are preparing to tell President Obama that they want a Balanced Budget Amendment (BBA) to the Constitution passed in Congress in exchange for raising the statuary debt ceiling above $14.2 trillion. “My hope is that we would force a vote on a Balanced Budget Amendment as a condition to voting on the debt ceiling,” Sen. John Cornyn (R.-Tex.) told HUMAN EVENTS. “By next week, or shortly thereafter, we will have all 47 Republicans unified behind the effort, and then begin to reach out to our Democratic colleagues.”
To understand the foolishness of this approach, here’s all you need to know.
1. If Republicans really want to force a vote on a balanced budget amendment, they basically have that ability already. The rules of the Senate give individual Senators considerable ability to disrupt ordinary business and force votes on motions that at the very least would be proxies for a BBA. And if all 47 Republicans really want to make a stink, they can grind the Senate to a halt and demand an up-or-down vote on a specific amendment.
In other words, Republicans are about to give the democrats something that they really want – an increase in the debt limit – in exchange for a vote that they could get anyhow.
2. More important, what makes them think it is a good deal to give Obama more borrowing authority in exchange for something that, at best, is symbolic? Everyone knows that there is zero chance of getting the necessary two-thirds vote to approve a balanced budget amendment.
That’s not an argument against having a vote (particularly if the BBA is well-written with real limits on taxes and the size of government), but it definitely is not a smart negotiating strategy. It’s sort of akin to trading a power-hitting all-star for a minor league utility player.
Fiscal conservatives should demand substance, not symbolism, in exchange for a higher debt limit. I’ll put forth a few ideas in next few days.
[…] Republicans aren’t stupid enough to go along with that kind of […]
[…] this is a perfect example of why I often joke that Washington is divided between the Evil Party and the Stupid Party. And the fight over spending caps is a perfect […]
[…] I’m not sure, though this is a perfect example of why I often joke that Washington is divided between the Evil Party and the Stupid Party. […]
The GOP continually use the budget talks to sneak in laws
[…] suicide. That’s no reason for complacency, because spendaholics have on occasion gulled the Dumb Party into providing bi-partisan cover for unpopular tax hikes. President G.H.W. […]
I’m now not sure where you’re getting your info, however good topic. I needs to spend some time studying more or understanding more. Thank you for excellent info I was looking for this info for my mission.
[…] baffled by stupid Republicans (sorry to be redundant). Some GOPers have agreed to put taxes on the table. Not surprisingly, Democrats are praising them […]
[…] I’m baffled by stupid Republicans (sorry to be redundant). […]
[…] it appears that the GOP likes being known as the Stupid Party and is seriously considering a plan to increase the net tax burden on the American people – […]
[…] it appears that the GOP likes being known as the Stupid Party and is seriously considering a plan to increase the net tax burden on the American people – […]
[…] it appears that the GOP likes being known as the Stupid Party and is seriously considering a plan to increase the net tax burden on the American people – […]
[…] should be, but Republicans didn’t get the reputation of being the “Stupid Party” for nothing, and they are perfectly capable of snatching defeat from the jaws of […]
[…] I know that the GOP has earned its reputation as being the Stupid Party. And, yes, I realize the Democrats only need one Republican to capitulate and that the six GOPers […]
[…] joked on many occasions that bipartisanship occurs in Washington when the evil party and the stupid party come up with an […]
[…] say (and do) lots of stupid things, but the current fiscal debate has me focused on two specific statements. Both get me very […]
[…] say (and do) lots of stupid things, but the current fiscal debate has me focused on two specific statements. Both get me very […]
[…] post, incidentally, is not an attack on Republicans. I’m very willing to attack GOPers when they do the wrong thing, but I’m not sure they deserve to get hammered in this […]
[…] post, incidentally, is not an attack on Republicans. I’m very willing to attack GOPers when they do the wrong thing, but I’m not sure they deserve to get hammered in this […]
[…] post, incidentally, is not an attack on Republicans. I’m very willing to attack GOPers when they do the wrong thing, but I’m not sure they deserve to get hammered in this […]
[…] acquiesce to legislation that would increase the amount of revenue going to Washington. To be sure, Republicans are known as the “Stupid Party,” so anything is possible. But if GOPers can simply remember these three simple concepts, they will […]
[…] be sure, Republicans are known as the “Stupid Party,” so anything is possible. But if GOPers can simply remember these three simple concepts, they will […]
Rule #1 of negotiations – Get The Bird in The Hand. The only real and concrete changes would be a law, combined with House and Senate rule changes, that implement Spending Limits as Federal policy.
Here’s what should be demanded, by taxpayers, voters, and the GOP:
1) Require the passage of a “Spending and Deficit Limitation” law that has these provisions:
– No Federal budget that is higher than 20%, and any exceptions would have to be passed in both Houses by 3/5ths majority
– Congressional rule that requires a super-majority (3/5th) on any spending increase and on any spending that goes outside the budget, on any tax increase
– a supermajority for future debt ceiling increases
– The law would also specify a budget for out-years with a balanced budget target, not to exceed 6 years from now.
– Repeal all new entitlements passed in the last 4 years
You don’t need an amendment for the BBA concept. principles that the ‘cut-go’ rule in the House has, would be an effective and immediate good thing. So too would a rule against spending more than 20% of GDP in any budget cycle. These are good principles, but the BBA (or any constitutional amendment) is a flawed strategy since it has zero chance of getting enacted.
A LAW PLUS SENATE/HOUSE RULE THAT DOES THE SAME THING AS THE BBA WOULD BE REAL, IMMEDIATE AND EFFECTIVE. It’s the ‘bird in the hand’. Real negotiators give away on abstractions and principles and fight to get real, concrete, realizable items.
[…] Dan J. Mitchell: Republicans are actually talking about letting the debt limit increase in exchange for a vote on a balanced budget amendment. […]
[…] can now turn to my friend Dan Mitchell who explains exactly how stupid this GOP strategy is. The GOP, in exchange for increasing the debt ceiling, is not saying “give us the BBA or no […]
[…] posted yesterday about the stunning political incompetence of Republican Senators, who reportedly are willing to give Obama an increase in the debt limit in exchange for a vote […]
Oops, the Facebook group had to change (someone got the old one disabled, a government employee no doubt 🙂 )
New StopNationalDebt.com Facebook is at:
Facebook at http://www.facebook.com/pages/Federal-Debt-1-million-per-household-is-too-much/155810177811775
[…] posted yesterday at International Liberty about the stunning political incompetence of Republican Se…, who reportedly are willing to give Obama an increase in the debt limit in exchange for a vote […]
[…] posted yesterday at International Liberty about the stunning political incompetence of Republican Se…, who reportedly are willing to give Obama an increase in the debt limit in exchange for a vote […]
[…] Comments « The Stupid Party Strikes Again: Republicans May Raise Debt Limit in Exchange for Symbolic BBA V… […]
I could go with a small debt limit increase preconditioned by the PASSAGE of a BBA(with real teeth) first.
Good piece Dan. I look forward to your ideas.