President Obama made a much-hyped pivot-to-the-economy speech yesterday in Chattanooga, Tennessee.
I already explained, immediately following the speech, why his “grand bargain” on corporate taxes was not a good deal because of all the hidden taxes on new investment and international competitiveness.
But I also had a chance to dissect the President’s overall track record on the economy for today’s Chattanooga Times Free Press.
Here’s some of what I wrote.
…he didn’t say anything new or different. His audience was treated to the same tax-spend-and-regulate boilerplate that the President has been dispensing ever since he entered political life. …with Obamanomics, not only has America failed to enjoy the traditional period of four-to-five percent growth at the start of a recovery, the economy hasn’t even gotten close to the long-run average of 3 percent. That’s a damning indictment. But it gets worse. The data on employment is downright depressing. A look at the numbers reveals that the nation is suffering from the worst period of job creation since the Great Depression. Most startling, we still haven’t recovered the jobs we lost during the recession.
That’s some strong rhetoric, but there are plenty of numbers to back up my assertions.
Let’s take a look at the interactive website maintained by the Minneapolis Federal Reserve Bank. This site allows users to compare all business cycles since World War II.
Let’s start by comparing the current business cycle to what happened under Reaganomics.
As you can see, we’ve had a very sluggish recovery compared to the boom we enjoyed in the 1980s.
Not all of this is Obama’s fault, by the way. Here’s some more of what I wrote for the Chattanooga Times Free Press.
…all of these problems started before President Obama ever got to the White House. President Bush also was guilty of too much spending and excessive regulation, and his policies helped push the economy into a ditch. Unfortunately, even though he promised “change,” President Obama has been adding to Bush’s mistakes — and also raising taxes.
Some people may be wondering whether it’s fair to compare Reaganomics to Obamanomics. Maybe I’m cherry-picking data to make Obama (and Bush) look bad.
Since I’ve already admitted that it’s good to be suspicious of all people who work in Washington, I don’t begrudge folks who are skeptical of what I write.
So let’s now look at the Minneapolis Fed’s data for every business cycle since the end of World War II. As you can see, we’re currently mired in the most anemic recovery on record.
The employment data is even worse than the GDP data.
The comparison of Reaganomics with BushObamanomics is startling. There was a jobs boom in the 1980s, while today we haven’t even recovered all the jobs lost during the downturn.
And if we look at the current “recovery” compared to all other business cycles, it becomes even more apparent that big government is generating very bad results for the American people.
Here’s how I conclude my column.
…what’s the bottom line? The world is a laboratory, and the lessons are very clear. Jurisdictions with small government and free markets, such as Hong Kong and Singapore, grow rapidly. Nations with bloated welfare states, such as France, Italy and Greece, suffer from stagnation and decline. The United States historically has been somewhere between these two camps, which is why we had average growth of about 3 percent. We’ve become a lot more like Europe during the Bush-Obama years. That helps to explain why our growth numbers and jobs data are now so disappointing. Unfortunately, the President’s speech shows that he wants to step on the gas rather than turn the car in the right direction.
In other words, if we want more prosperity, we need to follow the recipe of free markets and small government.
[…] failure of Obama’s stimulus should have been a learning moment for Washington […]
[…] https://danieljmitchell.wordpress.com/2013/07/31/four-charts-showing-how-obamas-statist-agenda-is-hur… […]
you may think it’s bad where you live, ok then go visit Washington DC, where the elite who inhabit Feral gooberment live fiat and happy off your dimes, then go cry a river and do something about it.
[…] U.S. economy, then the outlook is very grim. Simply stated, the American economy is enduring the worst performance for labor markets since the Great […]
[…] U.S. economy, then the outlook is very grim. Simply stated, the American economy is enduring the worst performance for labor markets since the Great […]
[…] U.S. economy, then the outlook is very grim. Simply stated, the American economy is enduring the worst performance for labor markets since the Great […]
[…] may understand that the job market is weak and they may understand that redistribution programs are overly generous, but can you help them […]
[…] may understand that the job market is weak and they may understand that redistribution programs are overly generous, but can you help them […]
[…] on the dismal data from the Minneapolis Federal Reserve (as well as our own experiences), we know Obamanomics doesn’t work in the United […]
[…] Though, to be fair, everyone is suffering from the President’s statist policies. As shown by these charts from the Minneapolis Federal Reserve, the United States is enduring the weakest economic recovery since the Great […]
[…] to be fair, everyone is suffering from the President’s statist policies. As shown by these charts from the Minneapolis Federal Reserve, the United States is enduring the weakest economic recovery since the Great […]
[…] Daniel J. Mitchell, depuis Washington D.C, États-Unis. Les États-Unis souffrent de traverser la plus faible croissance économique depuis la Grande Dépression, un cuisant échec pour l’« Obamanomics ». Pour autant, les États-Unis n’ont pas […]
[…] given Obama’s miserable record on jobs, let’s close with this Glenn McCoy […]
[…] given Obama’s miserable record on jobs, let’s close with this Glenn McCoy […]
[…] United States is suffering through the weakest economic expansion since the Great Depression, which is a damning indictment of […]
[…] United States is suffering through the weakest economic expansion since the Great Depression, which is a damning indictment of […]
[…] https://danieljmitchell.wordpress.com/2013/07/31/four-charts-showing-how-obamas-statist-agenda-is-hur… […]
Mr. Landis,
By yourself some reading glasses. Or open your eyes. These graphs are as clear as they can possibly be.
Reblogged this on Public Secrets and commented:
But, if you hit the president with facts, you’re dubbed a racist birther, or something.
Meh. By failing to label axes in an understandable way, it is impossible to tell anything from these graphs. The only labelled point– if you read the fine print– is “June 2009” (which is the black diamond on the red graph.) OK. That is four months after the Obama inauguration, so it is plausible to set that dot as the dividing line between Bush policies and Obama policies.
Using that dot as the indicia of effect, I don’t see that the graphs support your conclusion.