There are several semi-permanent fiscal policy fights in Washington, most of which somehow are related to the big issue of whether government should be bigger or smaller.
Today, I want to focus on two of those battles, and point to developments in Japan to make the case that the left is wrong.
First, let’s look at a couple of sentences from a Wall Street Journal story about Japanese fiscal policy.
Top officials from Japan’s government and ruling party formally endorsed a revised bill to double the country’s sales tax, despite strong objections from other party members, in a sign of their determination to rein in the nation’s soaring public debt. …The legislation will double the current 5% sales tax in two stages by 2015 as a way to help pay for the nation’s growing social welfare costs as the population ages.
I realize I’m a strange person and I look at everything through a libertarian lens, but I think this story provides strong support for my viewpoint on two important issues.
1. Higher taxes lead to higher spending – Just like in the United States, politicians in Japan claim that they have to raise taxes to deal with deficits and debt. Indeed, the excerpt above includes that assertion, reporting that the VAT increase would be “to rein in the nation’s soaring debt.”
I think this is nonsense. Politicians are motivated by a desire to finance bigger government. And that’s what’s happening in Japan. Later in the article, we see that the real purpose of the tax hike is to “pay for the nation’s growing social welfare costs.”
2. The VAT is a money machine for big government – I’ve cited the European evidence to show that small VATs become big VATs in part because it is a hidden tax. My statist friends often respond by saying I need to look at Japan, Canada, and Australia, where VATs haven’t been increased. I then respond by saying it’s just a matter of time. So, even though I would like to be wrong, Japan is confirming my fears.
That being said, I must acknowledge the possibility that Canada and Australia may prove me wrong. And I will be happy if that’s what happens. Both nations have done a pretty good job of restraining the growth of government (see Table 25 of this OECD data), and I don’t see any immediate threat of VAT hikes. But I’m not holding my breath for what happens 10 years from now.
Last but not least, I’ve decided the title of this post is inaccurate. The left isn’t wrong. They know the higher taxes lead to higher spending, and they know the VAT is a money machine for big government. They just don’t publicly admit these are the results they want.
[…] Read More By Dan Mitchell […]
[…] Read More By Dan Mitchell […]
@Andrew M. Garland there is a good movie named Limitless in which a character states there is no limit to human capacity for over expansion.
I’m paraphrasing (since Netflix deleted the movie off my queue) “Let’s not invade Russia during the winter, let go back and enjoy the interest from our Swiss bank accounts and have a beer.”
Expansion until failure seems to be some kind of rule.
[…] Read More By Dan Mitchell. […]
Government will always expand until the economy bursts.
Politicians have children who need jobs, and they must pay off their supporters to be re-elected. What power on earth would stop this expansion, except the occasional collapse into riots and poverty?
[…] assertion,reporting that the VAT increase would be “to rein in the nation’s soaring debt.”Read More By Dan Mitchell.Photo Credit:Satorare Creative CommonsRelated posts:Documents Show Kagan’s Liberal Opinion On […]
But…but they mean well. And aren’t intentions what should really matter, not results?
[…] Read More By Dan Mitchell […]