I sometimes assert that the greatest enemies of freedom in Washington are mortgage payments and tuition bills. When people give me a blank stare, I say that I’m joking, but I use the opportunity to explain that the desire for easy wealth (and the lifestyle it enables) lures many Republicans to become lobbyists and to promote policies that they almost surely understand are bad for America.
These GOPers, who do the wrong thing to line their own pockets, are the worst people in Washington. They presumably first got involved in policy because they recognized government is a cesspool, but eventually got corrupted and decide it is a hot tub. To put it mildly, this gets me very agitated. For instance:
I have slammed a former Reagan Administration official for defending earmarks. I think it is morally offensive that he gets rich by facilitating the transfer of money from taxpayers to powerful interest groups.
I have condemned the former Senate Republican leader for defending Obamacare. I think it is disgusting that he puts his lobbying income ahead of America’s best interests.
I have denounced Illinois Republican legislators for killing school choice. I think it is downright nauseating that they condemn inner-city children to terrible schools in exchange for campaign contributions from teacher unions.
So you won’t be surprised to know that I am on the verge of going postal after reading a report from The Hill about all the Republican lobbyists who are getting lucrative contracts to fight against the Tea Party agenda and lobby on behalf of big government. Here are the utterly nauseating details.
A stable of former GOP aides has been hired by public television stations, children’s hospitals and other interest groups that fear they’ll be targeted for spending cuts by the Republican House. Most of the aides left Congress years ago, but many still have close ties to senior Republicans on Capitol Hill, including Speaker John Boehner (Ohio). They’ve been hired to try to convince the new GOP Congress that some public spending is worth continuing and not reducing. An advocacy group for the Association of Public Television Stations, for example, has hired GOP lobbyists John Feehery and Marc Lampkin of Quinn Gillespie & Associates to fight off budget cuts. …A review of lobbying disclosure records by The Hill shows the public television stations are hardly alone in recruiting GOP muscle. A number of associations hoping to retain federal funding have recently added GOP lobbyists with connections to the new majority. The hiring binge indicates Republican lobbyists are earning dividends from their party’s re-taking of the House in November and points to the headaches in store for a Republican House that wants to take a hatchet to public spending. Targets of GOP budget cuts say they need all the help they can get from the coming GOP-led onslaught. “Everyone is going to make their case for government support for their projects,” said one GOP lobbyist. …The California High-Speed Rail Authority has hired Ogilvy Government Relations’ Drew Maloney, a former aide to DeLay, to work on retaining federal grants for high-speed rail. …Williams & Jensen has registered to lobby for AARP to work on senior-citizen issues and President Obama’s deficit commission report. Prominent Republican lobbyist Steve Hart is among those working for the group, which wants to make sure the new healthcare law is not repealed. …The National Association of Children’s Hospitals (NACH) has hired former Rep. Deborah Pryce (R-Ohio) of Clark Lytle & Geduldig to lobby for the reauthorization of the Children’s Hospitals Graduate Medical Education program, which uses $317.5 million in federal funding a year.
Some of my Republican friends sometimes respond by asserting that Democrats are worse, but I grade on a curve. Democrats seek to make government bigger because they believe in statism. So it’s not terribly surprising or philosophically inconsistent for them to become lobbyists and get rich pushing to expand the burden of government (though some Democrats lobby for things that are not completely consistent with a left-wig agenda, such as special tax breaks or defense contracts, so it’s not a black-and-white divide).
Republicans, however, tell voters that they believe in small government and individual liberty. So when GOP politicians and staffers decide to get rich by lobbying for bigger government, that is more disgusting.
Doing the wrong thing is bad. But doing the wrong they when you know it is wrong is even worse.
In a nutshell, the American future is:
“American Idiots under French incentives to produce.”
Now what nation in the world is going to be able to compete with this indomitable combination?
——————————————————–
Lost in the details and bickering is the overriding epic development of our era. I.e. that:
- As the 3+ billion people in the Developing World are moving away from collectivism and thus ASCENDING towards the Average Worldwide Prosperity Level (AWPL),
- The 0.8 billion people of the Western World are reverting into collectivism and thus DESCENDING towards the Average Worldwide Prosperity Level (AWPL). Convergence will be swift.
The East is adopting western economic liberaralization and, at the same time, the West reacts by adopting eastern, Mao Zedong, five year mandatory collective growth plans. Convergence will be swift – very swift. The more time goes by, the faster things move in the world.
The early 21st century will sonn be remembered as the pivotal era when the Western World, bamboozled once again by collectivism, descended into worldwide averagedom.
So, have fun Westerners… and especially have HOPE… because anytime now, the right groups of experts will find the grand, master, top down, 5,10,20,50 year plan for generalized prosperity. It is just a matter of time before the right people are found, elected, and sent to Washington to implement it, i.e. impose it throughout the land… Perhaps a couple more elections is all it will take, and then off you will be on your road to prosperity once again as American Individuals under European governance (and associated incentives). Have hope! Change will come and Americans will once again be exceptional…
Just further evidence that Acton was right–power tends to corrupt.
One thing that would help would be to eliminate Washington, DC. What I mean is this: there was a time in our country when it was important to have the various bureaucracies in proximity one with another. Because of modern technology, proximity is almost meaningless.
Why not decentralize the bureaucracy? Move the Pentagon, figuratively, to Wichita. Send the SEC to Atlanta. Move the Senate to Bangor, ME, and the House to San Diego. Further, require members of the House and Senate to spend at least 6 months at home, communicating via the internet and conference calls.
It is the concentration of power that corrupts the good people who go to Washington, though I have to admit that bad, power-hungry people go to Washington, too; indeed, the power-hungry are already corrupt.
“Democrats seek to make government bigger because they believe in statism.”
So to what fortune do Democrats attribute America being the most prosperous country on earth? “Our central planning has always beaten, is beating and will beat everybody else’s”?
Do Democrats understand elementary probability?
So do they really “Believe in statism” or simply know that while statism is detrimental, they do recognize the electoral reality that harvesting the efforts of a competent minority to benefit a majority garners popular support and gets one elected to office, at which point the more the office becomes the gatekeeper of redistribution, the more the office holder benefits in fame, power and fortune. Is this type of hypocrisy any better?
E.g. We have earmarks because after all is said and done, people DO want earmarks. Of course they only want their earmarks, not other people’s, but they are willing to go along with the grand bargain whereby “you support my earmark, I’ll support yours, so that we can form the majority needed to force a more competent minority to pay for most of the bill”. Unfair? Economically inefficient? Pernicious to growth incentives and the future of the country? Loss of American exceptionalism? Sure. However, that’s what most people want in the immediate term, so that’s what they get to impose on everyone. In the mid to long term, prosperous countries are merely those whoose populations manage to escape this immediate and natural temptation.
One senses that you would use a much harsher language for the GOPers if you had the chance. The key words that you forgot to enter, though, are “most & leaders”; such as “The Most Despicable and Reprehensible People in Washington Are Most of the Republican Leaders”. Should that be the case, I think that by calling them despicable and reprehensible you are complementing them. You are giving the despicable and the reprehensible people a bad rap by associating them with most of the Republican spineless laggardship.
[...] Indeed, Republicans are probably even worse than Democrats. [...]
[...] explained in a previous post that some of the most despicable people in Washington are Republicans, but this story gives me an [...]
Thanks for shedding some light on why it is the Tea Party’s biggest haters are the mainstream GOP.
[...] And don’t forget that the Republican establishment in Washington is heavily influenced by corrupt lobbyists – many of them former GOP politicians! [...]
[...] Especially since programs that redistribute from the poor to the rich almost always involve corruption – often involving morally bankrupt Republicans. [...]
[...] But now for my serious point. Washington is filled with people who say things, write things, and do things solely because they’re getting paid. I often write about the sleazy behavior of such people, particularly Republicans who do the wrong thing just to fatten their bank accounts. [...]
[...] first chore is to explain why I hate Republicans, and as you can see here and here, there’s certainly ample reason to think I hold GOPers in low esteem. The actual question, [...]
[...] who perhaps came to Washington many years ago thinking it was a cesspool, but they’ve since learned to work the system and now they think it’s a hot [...]
[...] politicians who perhaps came to Washington many years ago thinking it was a cesspool, but they’ve since learned to work the system and now they think it’s a hot [...]
[...] since they are willing to fight for small government even when it means causing friction with establishment-oriented, go-along-to-get-along [...]
[...] And it goes without saying that I also don’t like politicians (including Republicans!). [...]