I’ve received several emails and Facebook messages asking me why I haven’t written about Trump’s recently unveiled budget proposal for the 2019 fiscal year.
My answer is that I don’t want to waste my time.
Let me explain what I mean. I wrote during the 2016 campaign that Trump was a big-government Republican.
But when he got elected and appointed some good people to fiscal positions, I decided to partially suppress my concerns. After all, maybe I was wrong.
So I wrote last year about his budget and praised specific provisions (dealing with government-funded media, food stamps, government-funded art, foreign aid, OECD subsidies, community development block grants, and Medicaid).
And I even outlined the strategy that was necessary to achieve success, at least with regards to so-called discretionary spending. But I included a very important postscript as part of that column.
P.S. I’m not convinced that Trump actually wants smaller government, but I hope I’m wrong. This upcoming battle will be very revealing about where he really stands.
Well, that battle occurred and the result was a disaster for taxpayers. The budget caps were busted again, with the net effect being even worse than the big-spending agreements back in 2013 and 2015.
But it’s not that the Trump Administration lost. They never even tried. The folks I know on Capitol Hill said the White House didn’t lift a finger to urge spending restraint, much less fight to limit budgetary growth. Never.
And the painful experience of the profligate Bush years taught me that most Republican Senators and Representatives will partake in a spending spree when they sense the White House is soft on the issue (the common excuse I get from them is that “the floodgates have opened, I can’t do anything to stop it, so I may as well get a chunk for my voters”).
What’s extra depressing is that Trump’s fiscal incontinence is actually par for the course for Republican presidents, at least in recent decades.
I recently crunched the numbers for every president since the 1960s who served at least one full term, and I measured the average annual growth of government spending (adjusted for inflation) for the years they held power.
Moreover, I sliced and diced the numbers in several ways. I wanted readers to understand what happened to total spending (the combined growth of defense and domestic outlays), as well as what happened to domestic spending.
And the bottom line is that Republicans generally do worse than Democrats. Not just on total spending. They’re even more profligate on domestic spending!
The only exceptions to this pattern are Reagan (the only good Republican) and LBJ (the only really awful Democrat).
By the way, I’m not claiming that Clinton, Carter, or Obama were fiscal conservatives or that they believed in small government. I’m simply pointing out government grew slower when they were in office, at least compared to the growth of government under Nixon, Bush I, or Bush 2. The numbers don’t lie.
I suspect these counter-intuitive results are because of two factors.
- Presidents try to deflect and/or preempt criticism, so that leads Democrats to be cautious about spending money (they don’t want to be called “big spenders”) and it leads Republicans to squander a lot of cash (they don’t want to be called “heartless” or “mean”).
- The party controlling the White House often loses seats in mid-term elections and that subsequently limits the ability of presidents to push an agenda that is opposed by the other party, or even leads them to acquiesce to initiatives pushed by the other party.
Needless to say, this is rather depressing for those of us who want to limit the size and scope of government. It’s quite likely that Trump will spend the next three years or seven years instigating and/or accepting bigger government. And then we’ll probably have a Democrat in the White House who will – at least for the first two years – push for even more government.
But I get more upset when Republicans are big spenders because they should know better. Most Democrats actually believe it’s a good idea to make America more like Greece. Republicans, by contrast, make us more like Greece because they put short-term politics ahead of the national interest.
Let’s close this depressing column with some anti-GOP humor, starting with a look at how libertarians see Republicans (h/t: Reddit‘s libertarian page).
Reminds me, for obvious reasons, of my “Charlie Brown Award.”
Next we have a gathering of Republicans who actually believe in smaller government (h/t: Reddit‘s libertarian page).
I guess you would say “like father, like son.”
Last but not least, here’s some very clever satire from Babylon Bee.
During a budgetary discussion Friday, Republican lawmakers announced a plan to pretend to be fiscally conservative again if a Democrat takes office again in 2020 or 2024. The GOP said it would begin to decry deficit spending and the $20 trillion debt in order to win votes
as soon as political power swung back to the opposing party. “The second a Democrat is back in the White House, we will once again start yelling about fiscal responsibility,” Speaker Paul Ryan said in an address to the House of Representatives Friday. “For now, we will continue to vote for unsustainable and irresponsible budgets that your children’s children’s children will pay for for centuries to come.” At publishing time, Republicans further announced they would pretend to oppose giving Planned Parenthood a half billion dollars year after year once they need conservative voters’ support to regain their offices.
Good dig about Planned Parenthood, needless to say.
But as we laugh about these jokes, just remember that the recklessness in Washington is going to come back to bite us at some point. No, we won’t have a Greek-style fiscal crisis in the next five years. Or even in the next 10 or 20 years.
But more spending and more dependency is not a good recipe for long-run economic health. Republicans understand that and I despise them for putting politics first and country second.
[…] Indeed, Republicans usually wind up expanding government faster than Democrats. […]
[…] Indeed, Republicans usually wind up expanding government faster than Democrats. […]
[…] stated, though I have learned through painful experience not to rely on Republicans to protect […]
[…] policies will improve with Biden in the White House, most notably trade, but also government spending (not because Biden is good, but rather because Republicans will go back to pretending to be […]
[…] Indeed, Republicans usually wind up expanding government faster than Democrats. […]
[…] Indeed, Republicans usually wind up expanding government faster than Democrats. […]
[…] about the nation’s outlook. Truss was forced to resign and big-government Tories (akin to big-government Republicans) are back in […]
[…] about the nation’s outlook. Truss was forced to resign and big-government Tories (akin to big-government Republicans) are back in […]
[…] policies will improve with Biden in the White House, most notably trade, but also government spending (not because Biden is good, but rather because Republicans will go back to pretending to be […]
[…] this cartoon strip shows what happens most of the time when consorting with […]
[…] policies will improve with Biden in the White House, most notably trade, but also government spending (not because Biden is good, but rather because Republicans will go back to pretending to be […]
[…] this cartoon strip shows what happens most of the time when consorting with […]
[…] this cartoon strip shows what happens most of the time when consorting with […]
[…] don’t like big-government Republicans in the United States, so it naturally follows that I don’t like big-government […]
[…] don’t like big-government Republicans in the United States, so it naturally follows that I don’t like big-government Tories in the […]
[…] that Reagan was remarkably effective in fighting big government. Indeed, what separates Reagan from every other Republican in recent history is thathe successfully fought to constrain the burden of government […]
[…] that Reagan was remarkably effective in fighting big government. Indeed, what separates Reagan from every other Republican in recent history is that he successfully fought to constrain the burden of government […]
[…] P.S. The last minute of the above video warns that Democrats have a policy agenda that will make America more like Argentina. That’s true, but the profligate spending of Bush I, Bush II, and Trump suggests most Republicans are not any better. They may even be worse. […]
[…] My two cents for today is that the current fight between Trumpism and establishment Republicanism is merely stylistic. If you crunch the numbers, you’ll see that both camps are big spenders. […]
[…] My two cents for today is that the current fight between Trumpism and establishment Republicanism is merely stylistic. If you crunch the numbers, you’ll see that both camps are big spenders. […]
[…] Republicans often are bigger spenders than Democrats – a pattern going all the way back to […]
[…] spending agenda is terrible, though it’s worth noting that Democrat presidents usually don’t spend as much as Republicans (with the admirable exception of […]
[…] spending agenda is terrible, though it’s worth noting that Democrat presidents usually don’t spend as much as Republicans (with the admirable exception of […]
[…] while GOP politicians often pay lip service to the principles of limited government,they usually increase spending even faster than […]
[…] My two cents for today is that the current fight between Trumpism and establishment Republicanism is merely stylistic. If you crunch the numbers, you’ll see that both camps are big spenders. […]
[…] My two cents for today is that the current fight between Trumpism and establishment Republicanism is merely stylistic. If you crunch the numbers, you’ll see that both camps are big spenders. […]
[…] other Republicans didn’t learn any lessons from Reagan’s success. Both Bushes were big spenders, as was […]
[…] if we wind up with a typical big-government Republican in the White House, the wait for good policy will be much […]
[…] ever fewer people know that Republican presidents even increase domestic spending (discretionary […]
[…] other modern presidents (including other Republicans), Reagan successfully reduced the tax burden while also limiting the burden of government […]
[…] My two cents for today is that the current fight between Trumpism and establishment Republicanism is merely stylistic. If you crunch the numbers, you’ll see that both camps are big spenders. […]
[…] in 2022 – I don’t have much faith in Republicans to do the right thing (especially when a Republican is in the White House), but I hope they win the House and Senate in November because they will oppose big tax increases […]
[…] in 2022 – I don’t have much faith in Republicans to do the right thing (especially when a Republican is in the White House), but I hope they win the House and Senate in November because they will oppose big tax increases […]
[…] P.S. My criticisms of Biden are not driven by partisanship. I’m also not a fan when Republicans enact bad policy. […]
[…] My two cents for today is that the current fight between Trumpism and establishment Republicanism is merely stylistic. If you crunch the numbers, you’ll see that both camps are big spenders. […]
[…] My two cents for today is that the current fight between Trumpism and establishment Republicanism is merely stylistic. If you crunch the numbers, you’ll see that both camps are big spenders. […]
[…] P.S. My criticisms of Biden are not driven by partisanship. I’m also not a fan when Republicans enact bad policy. […]
[…] P.S. My criticisms of Biden are not driven by partisanship. I’m also not a fan when Republicans enact bad policy. […]
[…] while GOP politicians often pay lip service to the principles of limited government,they usually increase spending even faster than […]
[…] policies will improve with Biden in the White House, most notably trade, but also government spending (not because Biden is good, but rather because Republicans will go back to pretending to be […]
[…] ever fewer people know that Republican presidents even increase domestic spending (discretionary […]
[…] ever fewer people know that Republican presidents even increase domestic spending (discretionary outlays plus […]
[…] know from U.S. experience that Republicans can be very profligate. Well, the same problem exists with the Conservative Party on the other side of the Atlantic […]
[…] I’m a big believer in focusing on results rather than reputation or rhetoric. For instance, many Republican politicians talk a good game about spending restraint. But when you crunch the numbers, it turns out that they often increase spending even faster than Democrats. […]
[…] I’m a big believer in focusing on results rather than reputation or rhetoric. For instance, many Republican politicians talk a good game about spending restraint. But when you crunch the numbers, it turns out that they often increase spending even faster than Democrats. […]
[…] Our first item could be a picture of me when observing fights between big-government Democrats and big-government Republicans. […]
[…] policies will improve with Biden in the White House, most notably trade, but also government spending (not because Biden is good, but rather because Republicans will go back to pretending to be […]
[…] other modern presidents (including other Republicans), Reagan successfully reduced the tax burden while also limiting the burden of government […]
[…] other modern presidents (including other Republicans), Reagan successfully reduced the tax burden while also limiting the burden of government […]
[…] policies will improve with Biden in the White House, most notably trade, but also government spending (not because Biden is good, but rather because Republicans will go back to pretending to be […]
[…] policies will improve with Biden in the White House, most notably trade, but also government spending (not because Biden is good, but rather because Republicans will go back to pretending to be […]
[…] policies will improve with Biden in the White House, most notably trade, but also government spending (not because Biden is good, but rather because Republicans will go back to pretending to be […]
[…] other modern presidents (including other Republicans), Reagan successfully reduced the tax burden while also limiting the burden of government […]
[…] other modern presidents (including other Republicans), Reagan successfully reduced the tax burden while also limiting the burden of government […]
[…] other modern presidents (including other Republicans), Reagan successfully reduced the tax burden while also limiting the burden of government […]
[…] my favorite, though given the spending proclivities of many Republicans, it should simply read “politicians promising everything for […]
[…] other modern presidents (including other Republicans), Reagan successfully reduced the tax burden while also limiting the burden of government […]
[…] other modern presidents (including other Republicans), Reagan successfully reduced the tax burden while also limiting the burden of government […]
[…] while GOP politicians often pay lip service to the principles of limited government,they usually increase spending even faster than […]
[…] other modern presidents (including other Republicans), Reagan successfully reduced the tax burden while also limiting the burden of government […]
[…] other modern presidents (including other Republicans), Reagan successfully reduced the tax burden while also limiting the burden of government […]
[…] politicians often pay lip service to the principles of limited government, they usually increase spending even faster than […]
[…] while GOP politicians often pay lip service to the principles of limited government,they usually increase spending even faster than […]
[…] while GOP politicians often pay lip service to the principles of limited government, they usually increase spending even faster than […]
[…] spending agenda is terrible, though it’s worth noting that Democrat presidents usually don’t spend as much as Republicans (with the admirable exception of […]
[…] policies will improve with Biden in the White House, most notably trade, but also government spending (not because Biden is good, but rather because Republicans will go back to pretending to be […]
[…] policies will improve with Biden in the White House, most notably trade, but also government spending (not because Biden is good, but rather because Republicans will go back to pretending to be […]
[…] policies will improve with Biden in the White House, most notably trade, but also government spending (not because Biden is good, but rather because Republicans will go back to pretending to be […]
[…] policies will improve with Biden in the White House, most notably trade, but also government spending (not because Biden is good, but rather because Republicans will go back to pretending to be […]
[…] government can be good, but it may actually produce the worst-possible results when you combine weak-on-spending Republican presidents with profligate Democratic […]
[…] government can be good, but it may actually produce the worst-possible results when you combine weak-on-spending Republican presidents with profligate Democratic […]
[…] the biggest silver lining to a Biden victory is that Republicans will revert to pretending to once again be opposed to big […]
[…] the biggest silver lining to a Biden victory is that Republicans will revert to pretending to once again be opposed to big […]
[…] to the burden of government spending during their tenures. And one thing that stands out is that Republicans seem to be even worse than Democrats – even when looking at what happened to domestic spending (with Reagan and […]
[…] spending agenda is terrible, though it’s worth noting that Democrat presidents usually don’t spend as much as Republicans (with the admirable exception of […]
[…] Trump is a big spender (and a protectionist). Every major Republican in the post-Reagan era has expanded the burden of government and rejected the principles of classical […]
[…] even make the laughable claim that the Republican Party in recent decades has been dominated by libertarian economic thinking. […]
[…] even make the laughable claim that the Republican Party in recent decades has been dominated by libertarian economic thinking. […]
[…] limiting outlays to 0.5 percent annual growth. The other thing that’s remarkable is that every other Republican was worse than Bill Clinton, Jimmy Carter, and Barack […]
[…] than politics, I like to think I’m largely immune from this tendency. I criticize either Republicans or Democrats when they do something wrong, and I also offer praise when either Republicans or […]
[…] So, at the risk of sounding like a politician, I also disagree with Steve. Instead of writing a column discussing additional tax cuts, he should have used the opportunity to condemn big-spending GOPers. […]
[…] Ugh, sounds like he may be the British version of Trump. Or Bush, or Nixon. […]
[…] Macri parece aún peor que algunos de los republicanos del gran gobierno de Estados […]
[…] Ugh, Macri seems even worse than some of America’s big-government Republicans. […]
Let’s be fair. Every time Trump trys to get money needed to keep his promises to the voters, the Democrats black mail him into giving them more money to spend foolishly on investigations!
[…] And it’s not looking good on the Republican side, either. Trump may not have crazy proposals for new spending, but in practice he’s been profligate. Indeed, I’m guessing he will wind up with a worse record on spending than Obama. […]
[…] few months later, I concluded that the answer was no. Trump – like Bush and Nixon – was a big-government […]
[…] President already has demonstrated – repeatedly – that he likes to spend other people’s […]
[…] the power to force a sequester. All he has to do is veto any spending bill that busts the caps. But don’t hold your breath waiting for that to […]
[…] being said, I’ve crunched budget numbers and revealed that Republican presidents generally allow more spending than Democrats. The only exception to this rule is Ronald […]
[…] interview, but I also warn that his proposed tax cut is impractical because Republicans have done a lousy job on spending. And I also point out that it is ironic that Trump is urging lower taxes for the middle class when […]
[…] interview, but I also warn that his proposed tax cut is impractical because Republicans have done a lousy job on spending. And I also point out that it is ironic that Trump is urging lower taxes for the middle class when […]
[…] P.P.S. Maybe it’s difficult to educate Republicans because they’re part of the problem? […]
[…] got so upset at profligate GOPers that I crunched the numbers and revealed that (with the notable exception of Reagan) Republican presidents are even bigger […]
[…] there’s some hard evidence the problem actually becomes […]
[…] the image is unfair. I’ve crunched the numbers. Democrats generally don’t increase spending as fast as […]
[…] the image is unfair. I’ve crunched the numbers. Democrats generally don’t increase spending as fast as […]
[…] Yes, we can definitely say the spending trend has been reversed. Just not in a good way. […]
[…] largely agree. Trump has nominally endorsed some reforms, but the White House hasn’t expended the slightest bit of effort to fix any of the entitlement […]
[…] I’ll end on a pessimistic note by observing that we normally get bad fiscal policy from Democrats and worse fiscal policy from Republicans (Reagan being the only […]
[…] I’ll end on a pessimistic note by observing that we normally get bad fiscal policy from Democrats and worse fiscal policy from Republicans (Reagan being the only […]
Sad but true.
When the GOP’s Saint of Fiscal Responsibility Paul Ryan was Chairman of the House Budget Committee, he asked the CBO to project the impact of higher (e.g., normal) interest rates on the size of the annual interest payments on the national debt.
The CBO responded: disaster lies ahead if DC does not get its fiscal act together.
So Saint Paul is going full speed ahead on accelerating our disaster. His top priorities are crystal clear: retaining his speakership, his Versailles-like speaker’s office suite and his speaker’s 24-7 limo.
Dan(iel): me thinks your word “despise” does not do justice to Ryan’s perfidy.
The joke is that it was no joke.