Last year, while writing about the sleazy and self-serving behavior at the IRS, I came up with a Theorem that explains day-to-day behavior in Washington.
It might not be as pithy as Mitchell’s Law, and it doesn’t contain an important policy prescription like Mitchell’s Golden Rule, but it could be the motto of the federal government.
Simply stated, government is a racket that benefits the DC political elite by taking money from average people in America
I realize this is an unhappy topic to be discussing during the Christmas season, but the American people need to realize that they are being raped and pillaged by the corrupt insiders that control Washington and live fat and easy lives at our expense.
If you don’t believe me, check out this map showing that 10 of the 15 richest counties in America are the ones surrounding our nation’s imperial capital.
Who would have guessed that the wages of sin are so high?
But even though the District of Columbia isn’t on the list, that doesn’t mean the people actually living in the capital are suffering.
Here are some interesting nuggets from a report in the Washington Business Journal.
D.C. residents are enjoying a personal income boom. The District’s total personal income in 2012 was $47.28 billion, or $74,733 for each of its 632,323 residents, according to the Office of the Chief Financial Officer’s Economic and Revenue Trends report for November. The U.S. average per capita personal income was $43,725.
Why is income so much higher? Well, the lobbyists, politicians, bureaucrats, interest groups, contractors, and other insiders who dominate DC get much higher wages than people elsewhere in the country.
And they get far higher fringe benefits.
In terms of pure wages, D.C., on a per capita basis, was 79 percent higher than the national average in 2012 — $36,974 to $20,656. …Employee benefits were 102 percent higher in D.C. than the U.S. average in 2012, $7,514 to $3,710. Proprietor’s income, 137 percent higher — $9,275 to $3,906. …The numbers suggest D.C. residents are living the high life.
Now let’s share a chart from Zero Hedge. It uses median household income rather than total personal income, so the numbers don’t match up, but what’s noteworthy is how DC income grew faster than the rest of the nation during the Bush years and then even more dramatically diverged from the rest of the country during the Obama years.
In other words, policies like TARP, the fake stimulus, and Obamacare have been very good for Washington’s ruling class.
Want some other concrete examples of profitable Washington sleaze? Well, here are some excerpts from Rich Tucker’s column for Real Clear Policy.
The real place to park your money is in Washington, D.C. That’s because the way to get ahead isn’t to work hard or make things; it’s to lobby Washington for special privileges. Look no further than the sweet deal the sugar industry gets. It’s spent about $50 million on federal campaign donations over the last five years. So that would average out to $10 million per year. Last year alone, the federal government spent $278 million on direct expenditures to sugar companies. That’s a great return on investment.
Big Corn may get an even better deal than Big Sugar.
Then there’s ethanol policy. Until 2012, the federal government provided generous tax credits to refiners that blended ethanol into gasoline. In 2011 alone, Washington spent $6 billion on this credit. The federal government also maintains tariffs (54 cents per gallon) to keep out foreign ethanol,and it mandates that tens of billions of gallons of ethanol be blended into the American gasoline supply. Nothing like a federal mandate to create demand for your product. How much would you pay for billions of dollars worth of largesse? Well, the ethanol industry got a steep discount. In 2012, opensecrets.org says, the American Coalition for Ethanol spent $212,216 on lobbying.
Rich warns that the United States is sliding in the wrong direction.
What makes Washington especially profitable is that its only products are the laws, rules, and regulations that it has the power to force everyone else to follow. …we seem to be sliding toward what the authors term “extractive” institutions. That means government using its power to benefit a handful of influential individuals at the expense of everyone else.
And let’s not forget that some people are getting very rich from Obamacare while the rest of us lose our insurance or pay higher prices.
This Reason TV interview with Andrew Ferguson explains that there is a huge shadow workforce of contractors, consultants, and lobbyists who have their snouts buried deeply in the public trough.
I particularly like his common sense explanation that Washington’s wealth comes at the expense of everyone else. The politicians seize our money at the point of a gun (or simply print more of it) to finance an opulent imperial city.
So if you’re having a hard time making ends meet, remember that you should blame the parasite class in Washington.
P.S. The insider corruption of Washington is a bipartisan problem. Indeed, some of the sleaziest people in DC are Republicans.
P.P.S. Though scandals such as Solyndra show that Obama certainly knows how to play the game.
P.P.P.S. Making government smaller is the only way to reduce the Washington problem of corrupt fat cats.
[…] I have also asserted over and over again that big government is a racket for the benefit of […]
[…] I have also asserted over and over again that big government is a racket for the benefit of […]
[…] Here’s a good video about how Washington gets fat and happy from corruption. And here’s an amusing video about […]
[…] It’s easy to find examples. Simply look at tax policy, spending policy, regulatory policy, energy policy, industrial policy, agricultural policy, foreign policy, health policy, trade policy, drug policy, and bailout policy. Or anything else involving politicians and their cronies. […]
[…] that’s hardly newsworthy. Politics, after all, is basically a never-ending racket in which insiders buy votes and accumulate power with other people’s […]
[…] that’s hardly newsworthy. Politics, after all, is basically a never-ending racket in which insiders buy votes and accumulate power with other people’s […]
[…] in many ways, government has morphed into a racketdesigned to enrich the lobbyists, insiders, contractors, bureaucrats, and […]
[…] Sugar also gets a sweet deal by investing in […]
[…] genocide surely would be more depressing. Nonetheless, I think it is a very bad sign that so many undeserving people are making so much money thanks to a bloated and cronyist central […]
[…] is some sinister, behind-the-scenes cabal running Washington, I tell them that petty corruption, self interest, and “public choice” are much better explanations for the nonsensical policies being […]
[…] better off by providing value to others. In government, by contrast, politicians oftentimes make themselves better off by providing unearned benefits to various interest […]
[…] Sugar also gets a sweet deal by investing in […]
[…] Block is trying to get the IRS to drive competitors out of the market. Big Sugar also gets a sweet deal by investing in politicians. Another example is the way major electronics firms enriched […]
[…] to these questions, but surely something is amiss. It’s almost as if government is simply a racket for the benefit of […]
[…] Given the pervasive parasitical corruption of Washington, nobody should be surprised to learn that plenty of Republican lobbyists are willing to shill for […]
[…] the “company” is a federal government that uses a coercive tax system to provide unearned wealth to various interest […]
[…] call it the “First Theorem of Government,” and I think it accurately reflects the real purpose and operation of government. Except I […]
[…] a scam where endless streams of money are shifted back and forth in leaky buckets. This scam is great for insiders and bad news for taxpayers. Washington involvement necessarily means another layer of costly […]
[…] Kupiec points out that it’s not fair that the DC-metro region gains such disproportionate benefits from overpaid bureaucrats and fat-cat […]
[…] a scam where endless streams of money are shifted back and forth in leaky buckets. This scam is great for insiders and bad news for taxpayers. Washington involvement necessarily means another layer of costly […]
[…] a scam where endless streams of money are shifted back and forth in leaky buckets. This scam is great for insiders and bad news for taxpayers. Washington involvement necessarily means another layer of costly […]
[…] Or corrupt our nation. […]
[…] other words, Brussels is like Washington. Sort of a scam to transfer money from taxpayers to the […]
[…] other words, Brussels is like Washington. Sort of a scam to transfer money from taxpayers to the […]
[…] other words, Brussels is like Washington. Sort of a scam to transfer money from taxpayers to the […]
[…] years ago, I wrote that Washington’s parasite class was having a very merry […]
[…] years ago, I wrote that Washington’s parasite class was having a very merry […]
[…] years ago, I wrote that Washington’s parasite class was having a very merry Christmas. But I wasn’t mocking […]
[…] years ago, I wrote that Washington’s parasite class was having a very merry […]
[…] The libertarian message of limited government generally is not warmly received in Washington because politicians, bureaucrats, cronyists, lobbyists, contractors, and other insiders profit from the status quo. […]
[…] The libertarian message of limited government generally is not warmly received in Washington because politicians, bureaucrats, cronyists, lobbyists, contractors, and other insiders profit from the status quo. […]
[…] but there’s a better explanation. These are people whose lavish lifestyles are because of big government. And when government gets even bigger, they have more chances to […]
[…] getting rid of earmarks didn’t win the war. Washington is still filled with lobbyists, bureaucrats, cronies, special interests, and other insiders who want more […]
[…] depressed. After all, I work in Washington where I’m vastly outnumbered by people who specialize in looting and mooching. At times, I feel like a missionary in a house of ill […]
[…] depressed. After all, I work in Washington where I’m vastly outnumbered by people who specialize in looting and mooching. At times, I feel like a missionary in a house of ill […]
[…] Sugar also gets a sweet deal by investing in […]
[…] in many ways, government has morphed into a racket designed to enrich the lobbyists, insiders, contractors, bureaucrats, and […]
[…] in many ways, government has morphed into a racket designed to enrich the lobbyists, insiders, contractors, bureaucrats, and […]
[…] has become a racket for the benefit of […]
You can’t just compare one measure of one city with the entire country and draw any meaningful conclusions from it. For example, look at the analysis at http://usbudget.blogspot.com/2014/02/is-washington-dc-problem.html . As the first graph shows, the metropolitan area with the highest per capita personal income in 2012 was Midland, Texas! That’s followed by Bridgeport, Connecticut, likely due to it becoming a hub for investment firms and hedge funds. In any event, there is no evidence that the problem with “lobbyists, politicians, bureaucrats, interest groups, contractors, and other insiders who dominate DC” will be solved by “making government smaller”. As long as we have a campaign system that requires politicians to spend much of their time raising money and remain totally dependent on that money, corruption and cronyism in Washington D.C. will likely continue to be a problem.
[…] They may want bigger government because they’re one of the many interest groups feeding at the federal trough. […]
[…] definitely realize that big government is very profitable if you’re an […]
[…] that’s hardly newsworthy. Politics, after all, is basically a never-ending racket in which insiders buy votes and accumulate power with other people’s […]
[…] that’s hardly newsworthy. Politics, after all, is basically a never-ending racket in which insiders buy votes and accumulate power with other people’s […]
[…] that’s hardly newsworthy. Politics, after all, is basically a never-ending racket in which insiders buy votes and accumulate power with other people’s […]
[…] to be more specific, it’s an example of how government has become a racket for the benefit of insiders. All of us pay more and endure less growth, but Washington’s gilded class lives fat and happy […]
[…] is rich because of unearned wealth. Almost all of the loot that winds up in the pockets of highly paid lobbyists, contractors, bureaucrats, politicians, cronyists, and other insiders ultimately comes from taxpayers in the rest of the […]
When Obamacare was just getting started, I commented to a liberal friend that he is always saying how the government is in the pockets of the rich and powerful, how it is a tool used by the rich to exploit the poor, that Washington is a wholly-owned subsidiary of the big corporations, etc. He agreed that all this was true. So, I asked, why do you want to give Washington control of your health care? Doesn’t that just mean that the rich and powerful will be able to work the system to their advantage while the weak and poor will be left out in the cold? Oh no, he replied, when the government takes over health care, everything will be fair and equally distributed. So, I asked, you’re telling me that you think this is going to be the first government program in the history of the country that is NOT a tool of the rich and powerful. Even knowing how liberal he was, I was really surprised when he answered simply, “Yes, I do.” I even gave him a concrete hypothetical: Suppose the son of a homeless person has some terrible disease that is not covered by Obamacare, and also the son of a senator has a terrible disease that is not covered by Obamacare. Both ask the government to change the rules so that their treatment would be covered. Which do you think will get the rule change. He assured me that any change would be made strictly on the basis of medical science with no prejudice to the rich and powerful.
Meanwhile, the American people spent six billion to make their ethanol more expensive. Actually spent even more since the government apparatus must collect a lot more than six billion in order to distribute six billion.
But it’s someone else’s money. Money of the person who invents your x6 world pay average American middle class job….
—————————
With ObamaCare, we are not only loosing our insurance and paying higher prices, we are also creating a huge compounding federal expense that sooner or later will have to be paid. Since ObamaCare is giving to each according to need, it must sooner or later return to take from each according to ability. Unfortunately, few maintain enough production and innovation enthusiasm to sustain American 6x worldwide prosperity, when a large chunk of their ability is harvested to service distant others.
Voter-lemmings will get to reap the fruits of the flatter effort-reward nation they hope to create.