In Part I of this series, I documented the dramatic decline in living standards ever since socialists took power in Venezuela.
In Part II, I compared Venezuela’s decline to the other Latin American nations, particularly the success story of Chile.
Initially, I planned on this being a two-part series. After all, what else needs to be said when a nation does so poorly that even other socialists try (and fail) to disavow its policies.
But I decided to add Part III because of a remarkable report in the New York Times.
Authored by Isayen Herrera and , it actually acknowledges that socialism has created massive problems. Here are some excerpts.
…a socialist revolution once promised equality and an end to the bourgeoisie. Venezuela’s economy imploded nearly a decade ago, prompting a huge outflow of migrants in one of worst crises in modern Latin American history.
…Conditions remain dire for a huge portion of the population…prices still triple annually, among the worst rates in the world. …Half of the nation lives in poverty…one in three children across Venezuela was suffering from malnutrition as of May 2022… Up to seven million Venezuelans have simply given up and abandoned their homeland since 2015… Last year’s inflation rate of 234 percent ranks Venezuela second in the world, behind Sudan.
What makes this story especially noteworthy is that the Times wrote another article about Venezuela’s dismal economy less than three years ago, yet that piece never once mentioned socialism.
So it’s a sign of progress that the paper now acknowledges that statist policies deserve the blame.
And I also think it’s remarkable that the article noted that socialism produces a grotesque version of inequality, with government insiders and other cronies getting rich while ordinary people suffer horrific deprivation..
Venezuela is increasingly a country of haves and have-nots, and one of the world’s most unequal societies… the wealthiest Venezuelans were 70 times richer than the poorest, putting the country on par with some countries in Africa that have the highest rates of inequality in the world.
The poster child for undeserved socialist wealth is Hugo Chavez’s daughter, who amassed more than $4 billion of ill-gotten gains.
P.S. In spite of the wretched state of the Venezuelan economy, some nutty leftists put together a “Happy Planet Index” that ranked Venezuela above the United States. I still haven’t figured out whether that was crazier than the Jeffrey Sachs’ index that put Cuba above America.
[…] that basis, the worst-governed country in 2022 was Zimbabwe, followed by Venezuela and […]
[…] quickly became the richest nation in Latin America, surpassing countries such as Argentina and Venezuela that foolishly embraced bigger […]
[…] quickly became the richest nation in Latin America, surpassing countries such as Argentina and Venezuela that foolishly embraced bigger […]
[…] learn about long-run socialist suffering from Cuba. We learn about rapid socialist collapse from Venezuela. We learn about gradual socialist collapse […]
[…] We learn about rapid socialist collapse from Venezuela. […]
[…] To be more specific, what if the central bank is buying government bonds because of concerns that there otherwise won’t be enough buyers (which is the main reason why there’s bad monetary policy in places such as Argentina and Venezuela). […]
[…] To be more specific, what if the central bank is buying government bonds because of concerns that there otherwise won’t be enough buyers (which is the main reason why there’s bad monetary policy in places such as Argentina and Venezuela). […]
[…] close by observing that Syria is the lowest-ranked nation, followed by Yemen, Venezuela, Iran, and […]
Thank you for this Mr Mitchell. The world had largely forgotten about Venezuela, so it’s good to keep that country in the news.
I hope that one day you can do a piece about countries that bounce back from socialism, whether that be eastern europe in the 90s, the UK in the 80s under Thatcher, or Venezuela in the 2030s (?). Until then, Happy Easter, and keep on posting please.
It’s just amazing that they fielded a decent baseball team in the World Baseball Classic. Have and have-nots indeed.
Reblogged this on Utopia, you are standing in it!.
I knew you weren’t trying to start an argument. And I wasn’t trying to turn it into an argument. You also have a good one!
Hi John,
I don’t have time to start another go-around as I explained before, but I hope you know I meant a “shout out.” I.e. being supportive of Dan and you. I just accidentally left out the word “out.” I wasn’t trying to “shout” at you! I was hoping to say something we could agree with on! You might want to look at the UN Happiness Index and read how it works. It’s pretty interesting. But anyway, I wasn’t trying to start an argument. Have a good one!
Hi Phil. The Happy Planet Index may be worse than others, but I’m not a big fan of any happiness index. I don’t think there’s anything wrong with happiness or trying to measure it. There’s just an inherent squishy-ness to measuring happiness, and I prefer to deal with more concrete issues of economics. I mean that for macro, big-picture thoughts and discussions. For my own personal life, I’m totally fine thinking about happiness issues.
[…] The Failure of Socialism in Venezuela, Part III — International Liberty […]
A shout to my friend John Michael Wagner. I hope he sees this. The Happy Planet Index is delusional if they rank Venezuela above the U.S. The gold standard in happiness indices has for a long while been the UN World Happiness Report. Since 2018 the U.S. has been on a slight upward uptrend (after a previous downtrend which saw us fall out of the top ten). Since the 2018 report (which I presume uses 2017 data) we have been at 19th, 19th, 14th, 19th, 16, and 15th. Venezuela, during the same time period has been at 102, 100, 84, 84 (?), 108, and 87. Q.E.D.