If you don’t want to be depressed, you should stop reading right now.
You probably know that we’ve been suffering because of a rising burden of government spending. And you probably understand that much of the problem is the relentless growth of redistribution and transfer programs.
But you probably don’t realize how far America has traveled in the wrong direction.
In today’s Wall Street Journal, Nicholas Eberstadt of the American Enterprise Institute rips apart President Obama’s empty assertion that the welfare state is desirable.
…the president is tired of listening to critics of America’s entitlement programs, and as far as he is concerned, the discussion is now over. It is not over—and won’t be anytime soon, because the country’s social-welfare spending is generating severe and mounting hazards for the nation. These hazards are not only fiscal but moral.
Eberstadt shares a bunch of bullet points that should worry anybody who cares about the future of the nation, starting with an inverse version of Mitchell’s Golden Rule. Handouts have been growing twice as fast as overall personal income!
• Over the 50-plus years since 1960, according to the Bureau of Economic Analysis, entitlement transfers—government payments of cash, goods and services to citizens—have been growing twice as fast as overall personal income. Government transfers now account for nearly 18% of all personal income in America—up from 6% in 1960.
• According to the BEA, America’s myriad social-welfare programs (the federal bureaucracy apparently cannot determine exactly how many of these there are) currently dispense entitlement benefits of more than $2.3 trillion annually. Since those entitlements must be paid for—either through taxes or borrowing—the burden of entitlement spending now amounts to over $7,400 per American man, woman and child.
The $7400 figure for per-capita redistribution burden is astounding. Others have calculated that this is akin to $60,000 for every poor household.
And even though I’ve written about the 49 percent figure, I had no idea that such a small portion was due to the aging population.
• According to the latest data from the U.S. Census Bureau, nearly half (49%) of Americans today live in homes receiving one or more government transfer benefits. That percentage is up almost 20 points from the early 1980s. And contrary to what the Obama White House team suggested during the election campaign, this leap is not due to the aging of the population. In fact, only about one-tenth of the increase is due to upticks in old-age pensions and health-care programs for seniors.
A big problem is that many working-age people have decided not to work.
• As entitlement outlays have risen, there has been flight of men from the work force. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, the proportion of adult men 20 and older working or seeking work dropped by 13 percentage points between 1948 and 2008. …In December 2012, more than 8.8 million working-age men and women took such disability payments from the government—nearly three times as many as in December 1990. For every 17 people in the labor force, there is now one recipient of Social Security disability program payments.
The solution, of course, is entitlement reform.
But that’s just part of the answer. We also need to change the culture. If people decide it is okay to live off the government, even leftists have begun to admit that it is very hard to re-create a system of self reliance.
[…] a “tipping point” of too much dependency. To be sure, the trends are not favorable, thanks to politicians like Obama, but 21 percent of the population receiving means-tested benefits is not nearly as bad as 47 […]
[…] outraged how their money is being wasted, but the far bigger problem is the mentality, present is an ever-growing number of people, that there’s nothing wrong with living off the […]
[…] Obama’s Vision of a Nation of Takers […]
[…] Obama’s Vision of a Nation of Takers […]
I’m reading a book, America’s Ticking Bankruptcy Bomb, by Peter Ferrara. It’s a good read so far and he has a great solution, IMO for welfare. Every able-bodies person should have to work for welfare. No more hand outs. Eliminating the dependency mindset is paramount to saving our country for the ruin that Greece has fallen and soon Europe.
Any may of you would be amazed at how many able-bodied people are on SS disability. Hire an attorney, hire a shady doctor and suddenly you aren’t capable of working any longer. Yet I know people with no legs that work every day.
There’s also another element of the people who decided not to work any longer: those of us who had nice, well paying jobs and decided we had enough. We can live on our savings WITHOUT depending on the government for a handout.
So we’re engaging in a tax protest by no longer working, not living off the government, but not earning enough to be the evil people who should pay all the taxes.
When I did this in December 2008, I didn’t realize that it was called Going Galt. Now I do.
Call me selfish. I don’t care. How is my time, effort, and psychic energy any less mine than that of the Obama phone lady?
Just my way of saying Eff-You to the Lyar in Chief.