I’ve written several times about the sometimes-deadly shortcomings of government-run healthcare in the United Kingdom (see here, here, here, here, here, here, here, and here), so I like to think I’m relatively immune to being surprised.
But this story from the Telegraph is a shocking combination of tragedy and farce. Some regional healthcare bureaucracies are deliberately delaying treatment to avoid raising “expectations” on the part of patients (that’s the farce part), a policy that helps them meet budgets because some patients may “remove themselves” from waiting lists by dying (that’s the tragedy part).
At least 10 primary care trusts (PCTs) have told hospitals to increase the length of time before they see patients in order to save money, an investigation by The Daily Telegraph has found. In some areas, patients endured delays of 12 or 15 weeks after GPs decided they needed surgery, even though hospitals could have seen them sooner. The maximum permitted time between referral and treatment is 18 weeks. In one case a manager said the policy keeps patients in line as “short waiting times also create more demand for treatment due to the expectations this raises”. It comes after an NHS watchdog suggested that if patients are forced to wait a long time, they will remove themselves from lists “either by dying or by paying for their own treatment”. …Too many PCTs have been operating in a cynical environment where they can game the system — and in which political targets, particularly the maximum 18-week waiting time target, are used to actually delay treatment.”
Amazing.
By the way, criticism of the UK’s government-run healthcare system is not an endorsement in any way of the US’s government-dominated healthcare system. America’s system is almost as screwed up, largely because government intervention has created a massive third-party-payer problem.
But a single-payer scheme is not the answer. At some point, when all the various government policies fail, we should give free markets a try.
[…] stories about the U.K.’s government-run healthcare system (see here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here and here) and I challenge you to read them […]
[…] stories about the U.K.’s government-run healthcare system (see here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here and here) and I challenge you to read them […]
[…] to denigrate their own nation. If you want to see more of these “false” stories, click here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here and […]
[…] to denigrate their own nation. If you want to see more of these “false” stories, click here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here and […]
[…] I guess this means that the media must be dominated by conservative liars, since we keep getting reports about substandard care and needless deaths (see here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here and here). […]
When Mr. Krugman, and the medical socialists, need surgery they should go to the back of the line, however long it is, and wait until the line disappears. A change in attitudes will follow.
[…] “are false,” we keep getting reports about substandard care and needless deaths (see here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, and […]
[…] surprisingly, this has generated terrible results for the British people, as I’ve noted here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, and […]
I knew of a doctor had his own system for making medicine affordable for low income patients (this was 30 years ago, so I don’t remember the doctor’s name). The charge for a low income patient was whatever they spent in one week on cigarettes and booze. Anybody who didn’t smoke or drink got free treatment.
I’ve always called government run health care what it is: Centrally managed death. The pharmaceutical and medical industries are an internment camp, enclosed by a paper legal fence.