I like to think people in the United States still believe in liberty, and I’ve cited some polling data in support of American Exceptionalism.
And it seems like that philosophical belief in individualism and limited government sometimes has an impact in the polling booth. According to a recent study, Obamacare was poison for Democrats in 2010.
Here’s an excerpt from a report in The Hill.
Voting for President Obama’s healthcare reform law cost Democratic incumbents 5.8 percentage points of support at the polls in 2010, according to a new study in the journal American Politics Research. The study helps explain why Democrats lost 66 House seats, significantly more than the median academic forecast of 44 to 45 seats, study co-author Brendan Nyhan of Dartmouth College writes on his blog. Democrats in the lead-up to the elections took a number of tough votes — notably on the Wall Street bailout, the stimulus and cap-and-trade — but none was as unpopular as their support for the healthcare reform law. “We show that the roll-call effect on vote share was driven by healthcare reform. Democratic incumbents who voted yes performed significantly worse than those who did not,” Nyhan writes. “We then provide simulation evidence suggesting that Democrats would win approximately 25 more seats if those in competitive districts had voted no, which accounts for the gap between the academic forecasts and the observed outcomes.”
As with any statistical study, you should take the results with a big grain of salt. That caveat aside, the conclusions of the study seem quite plausible. And since I’m not a fan of Obamacare and think the law will be much more costly than advertised, I’m not shedding any tears for politicians who lost their jobs after voting for the new entitlement.
But the 2010 election may have been a Pyrrhic victory – a short-run victory that paves the way for long-run defeat.
I think the left made a clever calculation that losses in the last cycle would be an acceptable price to get more people dependent on the federal government. And once people have to rely on government for something like healthcare, they are more likely to vote for the party that promises to make government bigger.
One of the most-viewed posts on this blog is the set of cartoons drawn by a former Cato intern, one showing how the welfare state begins and the other showing how it ends.
This is why Obamacare – and the rest of the entitlement state – is so worrisome. If more and more Americans decide to ride in the wagon of government dependency, it will be less and less likely that those people will vote for candidates who want to restrain government.
Europe is a good example. The supposedly “conservative” leaders of major nations such as Spain, Germany, France, and the United Kingdom are a bunch of big-government statists.
That being said, I’m not a complete pessimist. The Medicaid and Medicare reforms in last year’s Ryan budget would largely solve the problem, especially since any Obamacare subsidies presumably could be eliminated as part of such reforms.
I’m just not holding my breath that we’ll get real entitlement reform in the next four years.
[…] and a health perspective. And it also was a very costly deal for Democrats, costing them the House in 2010 and the Senate in 2014. But it definitely was […]
[…] enacted, I worried that it might be a long-term political victory for the left even though it was very painful for Democrats in the short run. Simply stated, voters in the future (and we’re now entering that future) would become more […]
[…] But it’s also understandable since it’s politically difficult to reduce handouts once people get hookedon the heroin of government dependency (a point I made even before Obamacare was […]
[…] issue. But it’s also understandable since it’s politically difficult to reduce handouts once people get hooked on the heroin of government dependency (a point I made even before Obamacare was […]
[…] issue. But it’s also understandable since it’s politically difficult to reduce handouts once people get hooked on the heroin of government dependency (a point I made even before Obamacare was […]
[…] Now you know what I speculated many years ago that Obamacare would be a long-run victory for the left even though Democrats lost many elections […]
[…] what he has in mind. In the back of my mind, I’m worried that I was right five years ago when I predicted that Obamacare would decimate the Democrats politically but nonetheless be a long-fun victory for […]
[…] agree that this is Obama’s biggest left-wing accomplishment. I’ve even noted that it may be a long-term victory for the left even though Republicans now control the House and Senate in large part because of that law (and it […]
[…] that this is Obama’s biggest left-wing accomplishment. I’ve even noted that it may be a long-term victory for the left even though Republicans now control the House and Senate in large part because of that law (and it […]
[…] that this is Obama’s biggest left-wing accomplishment. I’ve even noted that it may be a long-term victory for the left even though Republicans now control the House and Senate in large part because of that law (and it […]
[…] years ago, I shared some analysis suggesting that voting for Obamacare resulted in about 25 Democrats losing their congressional […]
[…] years ago, I shared some analysis suggesting that voting for ObamaCare resulted in about 25 Democrats losing their congressional […]
[…] years ago, I shared some analysis suggesting that voting for Obamacare resulted in about 25 Democrats losing their congressional […]
[…] Though, in retrospect, perhaps the GOP should have given Obama the Award since Republicans reaped the short-term benefits. […]
[…] is why I wrote back in 2012 that Obamacare may have been a victory (in the long run) for the left, even though it caused dozens […]
[…] political elitists in Washington are worried that the American people are lukewarm – or even downright hostile – about […]
[…] political elitists in Washington are worried that the American people are lukewarm – or even downright hostile – about […]
[…] law has been a disaster, both for the economy and for the Democratic Party. Not that we should be surprised. You don’t get better healthcare with a poisonous recipe […]
[…] law has been a disaster, both for the economy and for the Democratic Party. Not that we should be surprised. You don’t get better healthcare with a poisonous recipe of […]
[…] Wow. If I was a Democrat politician, I would not be overly happy at that list – particularly since Obamacare already has caused several dozen involuntary retirements from Congress. […]
[…] Wow. If I was a Democrat politician, I would not be overly happy at that list – particularly since Obamacare already has caused several dozen involuntary retirements from Congress. […]
[…] the way Obamacare is imploding in the short run, but they nonetheless may think that it will be worth it in the medium run because more people will be dependent on government (though they may regret their choice in the […]
[…] a matter of fact, there already is evidence that many politicians did lose their jobs back in 2010 because of […]
[…] don’t laugh too hard at these cartoons. Obama may get the last laugh if he can survive the short-run political damage and create more long-run government […]
[…] don’t laugh too hard at these cartoons. Obama may get the last laugh if he can survive the short-run political damage and create more long-run government […]
[…] in Colorado for the Second Amendment Daniel J. Mitchell | Sep 12, 2013 Back in 2012, I reported on some academic research showing that Democrats lost about 25 seats in the 2010 mid-term elections because of support for […]
[…] in 2012, I reported on some academic research showing that Democrats lost about 25 seats in the 2010 mid-term elections because of support for […]
[…] in 2012, I reported on some academic research showing that Democrats lost about 25 seats in the 2010 mid-term elections because of support for […]
[…] Democrats lost 25 House seats in 2010 because of Obamacare according to one academic study, so maybe Obama is being clever by postponing part of the […]
[…] political elitists in Washington are worried that the American people are lukewarm – or even downright hostile – about […]
[…] political elitists in Washington are worried that the American people are lukewarm – or even downright hostile – about […]
This is really interesting, You’re a very skilled blogger. I have joined your rss feed and look forward to seeking more of your magnificent post. Also, I’ve shared your site in my social networks!
Aw, this was a very good post. Finding the time and actual effort to produce a great article… but what can I say… I put things off a lot and never manage to get nearly anything done.
Greetings! Very useful advice within this article! It is the little changes that will make the most important changes. Thanks for sharing!
Article linked and Zorba’s comment posted on my feature “Wisdom from the Web” for March 12th 2012 http://talonspoint.wordpress.com/2012/03/12/wisdom-from-the-web-march-12-2012/
[…] New Research Shows Obamacare Resulted in 25 Additional Democratic Losses in 2010 Elections, but Was … […]
Zorba nailed it. If I might put it in more basic terms:
It is likely a long term win for Democrats as human nature of the majority of any people is passive.
Mr. Mitchell has described America’s decline in a few paragraphs.
Virtually every single European nation has travelled this road. And travelled it more or less independently, before the more recent era of the EU and its uniform mandates. So why would anyone think that Americans will escape that fate? The DNA of the American voter is the same as everyone else’s. It only takes a little bit of time for the vicious cycle to do its work – a little bit more time due to the unprecedented infusion of liberty endowed on this country at its creation – an unprecedented and unrepeatable historical coincidence where a few developed settlers discover a new continent and happened to seed it with the aberrant individual freedom ideas held by a small minority in late 18th century England. But that endowment and historical fortune is now all but used up, the margin of advantage that Americans hold over other nations is now very thin, and three billion emerging world competitors have little time or desire to wait and find out how America’s experiment with statism/socialism will turn out. Americans will lose their top prosperity, especially since most — even opponents of ObamaCare and other “care” packages to come — have no clue what is happening and what the fundamental forces of decline are.
Historical momentum can only carry you so far dear Americans. Rational understanding as to what had set you apart from the rest of the world is necessary to maintain it. And that rational thought does not exist — even amongst opponents of America’s Europeanization. Vague references to traditions and star spangled banners are simply grossly insufficient in preventing you from converging towards the worldwide average. You are now set on a below world average growth trendline: i.e. DECLINE.