I posted an amusing (and disappointing) graph in January showing how economists consistently failed to predict major changes in GDP. Russ Roberts of George Mason University explains in the Wall Street Journal that we should blame the practitioners of macroeconomics. They want the profession to be a hard science like physics, and some of them dream of the day when sophisticated models will make at least soft versions of central planning possible. But this is a fundamentally flawed way of thinking about economics. Professor Roberts says that the profession is more like biology because of the economy’s complex and unpredictable nature. Microeconomists, by contrast, focus on human behavior and thus are far more likely to have useful (and pro-market) insights about public policy:
The defenders of modern macroeconomics argue that if we just study the economy long enough, we’ll soon be able to model it accurately and design better policy. Soon. That reminds me of the permanent sign in the bar: Free Beer Tomorrow. We should face the evidence that we are no better today at predicting tomorrow than we were yesterday. Eighty years after the Great Depression we still argue about what caused it and why it ended. If economics is a science, it is more like biology than physics. Biologists try to understand the relationships in a complex system. That’s hard enough. But they can’t tell you what will happen with any precision to the population of a particular species of frog if rainfall goes up this year in a particular rain forest. They might not even be able to count the number of frogs right now with any exactness. We have the same problems in economics. The economy is a complex system, our data are imperfect and our models inevitably fail to account for all the interactions. The bottom line is that we should expect less of economists. Economics is a powerful tool, a lens for organizing one’s thinking about the complexity of the world around us. That should be enough. We should be honest about what we know, what we don’t know and what we may never know. Admitting that publicly is the first step toward respectability.
[…] have a multi-part series on why people shouldn’t trust economists (see here, here, here, here, and […]
[…] At the risk of over-simplifying, a potential lesson to be learned is that we should trust (or at least listen to) microeconomists while being skeptical of macroeconomists. […]
[…] why economists shouldn’t be trusted when they make economic forecasts (later that year, I pointed out that macroeconomists were the real […]
[…] different topic, I’m the first to admit that economists are easy to mock, especially the ones who think they know enough to fine tune the […]
[…] different topic, I’m the first to admit that economists are easy to mock, especially the ones who think they know enough to fine tune the […]
[…] I’ll be the first to admit that models are woefully inadequate in their attempts to measure millions of people making billions of decisions. Heck, I’ve even […]
[…] I’ll be the first to admit that models are woefully inadequate in their attempts to measure millions of people making billions of decisions. Heck, I’ve even […]
[…] This chart helps to show that economists shouldn’t try to make short-run predictions, which good economists already understand. […]
[…] that they don’t do a very good job when they venture into the field of macroeconomics, as Russ Roberts succinctly explained. And they look especially foolish when they try to engage in […]
[…] that they don’t do a very good job when they venture into the field of macroeconomics, as Russ Roberts succinctly explained. And they look especially foolish when they try to engage in forecasting.”We all look a bad […]
[…] that they don’t do a very good job when they venture into the filed of macroeconomics, as Russ Roberts succinctly explained. And they look especially foolish when they try to engage in […]
[…] that they don’t do a very good job when they venture into the filed of macroeconomics, as Russ Roberts succinctly explained. And they look especially foolish when they try to engage in […]
[…] I’ve explained why you shouldn’t trust economists (at least if they’re […]
[…] belief that government should steer the economy. And if you want to understand that issue, this post looking at the work of Robert Higgs is a great place to […]
[…] belief that government should steer the economy. And if you want to understand that issue, this post looking at the work of Robert Higgs is a great place to […]