Back in early 2009, the Center for Freedom and Prosperity released this video to explain the universal recipe for growth and prosperity.
The core message, if you want to skip the six-minute video, is that nations will become richer if they have a good mix of these five ingredients.
I’m recycling the video today because it is a perfect introduction to a superb column in the Wall Street Journal by Mary Anastasia O’Grady.
She explains that there’s little hope of solving the border crisis if foreign governments continue to impose bad policies that impoverish their citizens.
The right thing to do about the migration crisis is to return to a U.S.-led pro-growth agenda for the Western Hemisphere. …Open markets, sound money, light tax and regulatory policies and the rule of law were once standard U.S. advice for the neighbors. Today both Democrats and Republicans are protectionist. That’s bad enough. But the priorities of America’s far left have become top foreign-policy priorities for the Biden State Department and White House: LGBT initiatives, income equality, labor activism and the end of fossil fuels. Profit is a dirty word. …bidenista hostility toward capitalism everywhere. …it will be tough to hold back the human tsunami crashing on U.S. shores. Economic freedom and development are the only humane solutions to the poverty driving these huddled masses. …The Washington Consensus was…a blueprint for fiscal discipline, privatization, tax reform, deregulation and trade and investment liberalization. …its remedies bore fruit. …neither protectionism nor the antidevelopment ideology of socialism is cost-free. The hardship hitting all sides in the migrant crisis is the high price of getting the economics of development wrong.
The moral of the story is that the developing world needs free markets and limited government. That will mitigate the flow of illegals since there’s not a lot of emigration from nations that become prosperous.
Sadly, the usual knee-jerk response from Washington is foreign aid. But that approach is either wasteful or counterproductive.
P.S. Regular readers won’t be surprised to learn that the OECD and IMF are trying to further impoverish Latin American countries.
[…] we can hope that the IMF goes back to the days of the Washington Consensus and starts pushing good advice rather than bad […]
[…] P.S. I was going to speculate whether Milei could be the Ronald Reagan or Margaret Thatcher of Argentina, but he faces a much bigger challenge. If he succeeds, he will be the global role model for how to deliver an economic renaissance. […]
[…] explained a few months ago how poor nations can converge with rich […]
[…] I narrated a video more than 10 years ago to explain the recipe for poor nations to become rich nations. […]
[…] It’s almost as if there’s a recipe for poor nations to become rich nations. […]
[…] Milei appears to be fully aware of what is needed to rejuvenate his nation, and is also being very honest about what will be required. But also very […]
[…] the best way of helping poor countries achieve faster growth so they can converge with rich […]
[…] Let’s conclude with the observation that Milei takes office next month and he will face a less-than-friendly legislature. So will he have the ability to dollarize and make other reforms? I don’t know the answer, but it’s very encouraging that at least Milei understands the recipe for growth and prosperity. […]
[…] to be learned from this data. Regardless of your views on foreign policy, we know the policies that lead to more prosperity in the Middle […]
[…] Sounds like a familiar recipe. […]
[…] Given all this information, I’m baffled that some people have a negative view of “capitalism.” But maybe I should simply accept that the word is toxic to some people and instead use terms like “free enterprise” and “economic liberty.” Or maybe I should jsut call it “the recipe.” […]
[…] determines the success or failure of the above countries is economic policy. Some of them follow the right recipe. Others […]
Anonymous,
Ms O’Grady is highly intelligent and knowledgeable. She is not wrong. If some people migrate from Country A, that doesn’t really solve any problems for Country A. The ‘kleptocrats’ and the system are the problems, and they remain.
Ms. O’Grady has it roundly backwards. As long as the kleptocracies to the south can export their problems to the U.S., there’s no incentive for them to institute proper policies.
[…] A Growth Agenda for the Developing World […]