When I debate class warfare issues, here’s something that happens with depressing regularity.
I’ll cite research from a group like the Tax Foundation on how an overwhelming share of the income tax is borne by upper-income taxpayers.
The statist I’m arguing with will then scoff and say the Tax Foundation is biased, thus implying that I’m sharing bogus data.
I’ll then respond that the group has a very good reputation and that their analysis is directly based on IRS data, but I may as well be talking to a brick wall. It seems leftists immediately close their minds if information doesn’t come directly from a group that they like.
So I was rather happy to see that the Internal Revenue Service, in the Spring 2015 Statistics of Income Bulletin, published a bunch of data on how much of the income tax is paid by different types of taxpayers.
I’ll be very curious to see how they respond when I point out that their favorite government agency admits that the bottom 50 percent of earners only pay 2.8 percent of all income tax. And I’ll be every more curious to see how they react when I point out that more than half of all income taxes are paid by the top 3 percent of taxpayers.
There’s a famous saying, generally attributed to Daniel Patrick Moynihan, that “Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not his own facts.”
With this in mind, I’m hoping that this data from the IRS will finally put to rest the silly leftist talking point that the “rich” don’t pay their “fair share.”
This doesn’t mean, by the way, that the debate about policy will be settled.
Getting statists to accept certain facts is just the first step.
But once that happens, we can at least hope that their minds will be opened to subsequent steps, such as understanding the economic impact of punitive tax rates, recognizing that high tax rates won’t necessarily collect more revenue, or realizing that ordinary workers suffer when harsh tax policies reduce economic vitality.
Though I’m not holding my breath and expecting miracles. After all, some leftists openly state that they don’t care if the economic damage of high tax rates is so significant that government doesn’t collect any tax revenue.
You can see an example of one of these spite-motivated people at the 4:20 mark of the video I narrated on class-warfare taxation.
P.S. Shifting to another tax topic, some of you may have heard about the massive data breach at the IRS. Here’s some of what CNN is reporting.
The Internal Revenue Service believes that a major cyber breach that allowed criminals to steal the tax returns of more than 100,000 people originated in Russia, Rep. Peter Roskam confirmed to CNN on Thursday. …The IRS announced Tuesday that organized crime syndicates used personal data obtained elsewhere to access tax information, which they then used to file $50 million in fraudulent tax refunds.
I suppose I could use this opportunity to take a few potshots at the IRS, but there’s a far more important issue to raise.
I’m guessing the IRS probably has the best computer security of any tax bureaucracy in the world. Yet even all the IRS’s expertise couldn’t stop hackers from obtaining sensitive information.
Now let’s contemplate something truly frightening. The Obama Administration wants the United States to be part of an OECD pact that obligates participating nations to promiscuously share information with dozens of other governments, including untrustworthy, hostile, and/or corrupt regimes such as Russia and China, not to mention make information available to jurisdictions that presumably will have very little technical capacity to guard data from hackers and identity thieves. Here’s the list of participating nations on the OECD website, and it includes Azerbaijan, Cameroon, Greece, Indonesia, Mexico, Nigeria, Romania, Saudi Arabia, and Ukraine.
Yet none of this reckless endangerment would be an issue if we had a simple territorial tax system like the flat tax. Under such a simple and fair system, only income inside America’s borders would be taxed (unlike the wretched system of worldwide taxation we have now), so there would be no need to have risky information-swapping deals with dodgy foreign governments.
P.P.S. Senator Rand Paul is one of the few lawmakers fighting to protect Americans from having their information shared with foreign governments.
P.P.P.S. Shifting back to the original topic of class-warfare taxation, here’s a lesson on the Laffer Curve I offered to President Obama.
[…] Leftists should be nice to rich people people because those entrepreneurs, investors, and business owners are the ones financing the federal government. […]
[…] instance, even the IRS freely admits that upper-income taxpayers finance a hugely disproportionate chunkof the income tax […]
[…] instance, even the IRS freely admits that upper-income taxpayers finance a hugely disproportionate chunkof the income tax […]
[…] instance, even the IRS freely admits that upper-income taxpayers finance a hugely disproportionate chunk of the income tax […]
[…] States takes a different approach. We also impose onerous burdens on upper-income taxpayers (as confirmed by IRS data), but we impose comparatively modest taxes on everyone […]
[…] upper-income taxpayers finance the vast majority of America’s medium-sized welfare […]
[…] argued last year that leftists should be nice to rich people because upper-income taxpayers finance the vast majority of the American welfare state according to government data. Needless to say, my comment about being “nice” […]
[…] argued last year that leftists should be nice to rich people because upper-income taxpayers finance the vast majority of the American welfare state according to government data. Needless to say, my comment about being “nice” was somewhat […]
[…] argued last year that leftists should be nice to rich people because upper-income taxpayers finance the vast majority of the American welfare state according to government data. Needless to say, my comment about being “nice” was […]
[…] argued last year that leftists should be nice to rich people because upper-income taxpayers finance the vast majority of the American welfare state according to government […]
[…] argued last year that leftists should be nice to rich people because upper-income taxpayers finance the vast majority of the American welfare state according to government […]
[…] critics will say “the rich” will get most of the tax relief. And even though the rich already pay most of the taxes and even though the rest of us will benefit from faster growth, Republicans are sensitive to that […]
[…] Since even the IRS has admitted that upper-income taxpayers finance a hugely disproportionate share of the federal government, it hardly seems fair to subject them to even more onerous penalties. Especially since the IRS data from the 1980s suggest punitive rates could lead to less revenue rather than more. […]
[…] captured by this variable, given the way the tax code doesn’t tax low-income people and over-taxes high-income people, is the degree to which state have lots of rich people or poor people. But that’s not a […]
[…] numbers, Congressional Budget Office calculations, information from the New York Times, or data from the IRS, rich people in the United States are paying a hugely disproportionate share of the tax […]
[…] numbers, Congressional Budget Office calculations, information from the New York Times, or data from the IRS, rich people in the United States are paying a hugely disproportionate share of the tax […]
[…] numbers, Congressional Budget Office calculations, information from the New York Times, or data from the IRS, rich people in the United States are paying a hugely disproportionate share of the tax […]
[…] numbers, Congressional Budget Office calculations, information from the New York Times, or data from the IRS, rich people in the United States are paying a hugely disproportionate share of the tax […]
[…] numbers, Congressional Budget Office calculations, information from the New York Times, or data from the IRS, rich people in the United States are paying a hugely disproportionate share of the tax […]
[…] numbers, Congressional Budget Office calculations, information from the New York Times, or data from the IRS, rich people in the United States are paying a hugely disproportionate share of the tax […]
[…] numbers, Congressional Budget Office calculations, information from the New York Times, or data from the IRS, rich people in the United States are paying a hugely disproportionate share of the tax […]
[…] since even the IRS has admitted that upper-income taxpayers finance a hugely disproportionate share of the federal government, […]
[…] the IRS admits the tax system is very biased against the so-called […]
This comes as no surprise.
[…] Left-wing politicians in the United States, by contrast, express contempt and disdain for the upper-income taxpayers who finance our welfare state. […]
[…] as shown by a different set of IRS data, the American tax system already is heavily biased against the so-called rich. Even when compared […]
[…] previously shared very detailed IRS data showing that the so-called rich pay a hugely disproportionate share of the tax […]
[…] people would look at those numbers, or at similar data produced by the IRS, and conclude that we’re already selectively over-penalizing upper-income […]
[…] In other words, Sen. Sanders’ plan is a threat to the wallets of the people who actually pay for government. […]
[…] In other words, Sen. Sanders’ plan is a threat to the wallets of the people who actually pay for government. […]
[…] Even the IRS has acknowledged that the top 3 percent pay more than half the burden! […]
[…] Even the IRS has acknowledged that the top 3 percent pay more than half the burden! […]
[…] Even the IRS has acknowledged that the top 3 percent pay more than half the burden! […]
[…] Mitchell from the Cato Institute brought to light a new report by the IRS that lays to rest the statist claim that the rich do not pay their […]
Reblogged this on Daňová sebeobrana podnikatele.
As long as we have “representatives” who represent their own interests over the interests of Freedom and of the People, the Theft of the American Tax Dollar will never cease. As a matter of fact, it will only increase.
I see only one of two ways out…either we get a Constitutionalist President leading a Conservative movement, (can you say Rand Paul?) or we have an armed revolution. We already have revolution in the streets as it is, but it is in the wrong direction….FOR Federalism instead of for FREEDOM.
2016 will be pivotal…if a Constitutionalist wins, we still have time. If some Statist wins (Hillary) then the collapse will teeter ever closer, and all it will take to go nationwide is one incident like Ferguson to initiate the collapse.
11/10 Had to click a link to find income tax % versus wealth %, took 10 minute at the fridge to realize that the income tax does not encompass the entirety of our stupid tax code. I now want to hire an economist just to chat with him.
Great column, Dan.
Thanks for the depressing comment, Zorba! I do pretty much agree with you, but when I see it put in words like that I am simultaneously saddened, angered, and hopeful. I know there are more people like myself willing to fight and work for American freedom via the constitution. Maybe the big money collapse (??) of around October (??) this year (??) will be the catalyst for action, an action we never thought possible again. It always seems darkest before the dawn, and I routinely must get away from the news on the internet and be out in the sunshine lest I go insane.
I don’t know but I am feeling like the Gary Larson cartoon of a bunch of cows in the stock yard- one serious one- having the caption,” Only Claire, with her over-sized brain, wore an expression of concern.”
Hopeful but realistic… at least I know how to grow food, can it, build with wood, and the basics of electrical and plumbing. If I survive the collapse, I believe my skill set will be valuable.
What is a “fair share” indeed?
Even with a completely flat tax, the most successful, i.e. the most productive per capita people, will be paying the most tax.
It won’t be the top 3% paying half the tax, it may be the top 13%, or some other small percent paying it.
Does a CEO earning one hundred times the low wage use (or for that matter need) one hundred times more roads, fire stations, police, or schools?
Even a flat tax is distortionary in terms of individual freedom economics. Of course, much less so than the current progressive system.
In practical terms, the progressives, having driven the rich into the Laffer boundaries, will get what they deserve: VAT.
There are simply too few cows left to effectively milk for progressives to get all the “free” government goodies they want. So VAT is what they’ll get, just like in Europe, their model continent.
…and… the most important outcome, of course, which primarily determines our long term prosperity
… will be that we will all be saddled with sub par growth that cannot even match half the world average. Just like Europe, our new model continent. Subpar growth that will steadily but constantly and relentlessly compound our world prosperity rankings down towards the middle income countries.
That will be the central theme of the progressive revolution.
As Americans culturally converge to the standard mindset of the average worldwide voter, so will his/her prosperity. There is simply no way around that if you are a realist.
Successful and forward looking people should take this trajectory into account and make plans ahead. As the compounding slow growth decline takes hold, it will become increasingly difficult to escape.
Tell me where Mitchell Island is, and I’ll sail to it.
P.S. Actually there is a Mitchell Island by Vancouver BC but I doubt they follow Dan Mitchell economics. Looks like there’s a Mitchell island in Texas too.
Good paper dan – unfortunately Jessie James was correct – a smart IRS director will focus efforts on where the money is – so focusing on possible high value tax cheats who ought to pay according to the law is just good common sense business strategy – just ask my friend John Koskinen the current director who I’m sure would be open to talk to you – I’m thankful we have people like him who implement the laws intelligently efficiently and faithfully – it up to us to change the law if we don’t like them not disparage those who do — Agree ?? I hope so I’m frankly tired of inside the beltway character destruction from those out of the arena – agree ? 🙂
[…] Reposted from International Liberty. […]