Senator Rand Paul is being criticized and condemned by the Washington establishment.
That’s almost certainly a sign that he’s doing the right thing. And given the recent events in Russia and Ukraine, we should say he’s doing a great thing.
This is because Senator Paul is waging a lonely battle to stop the unthinking and risky move to a world where governments – including corrupt and evil regimes – collect and share our private financial information.
I’ve written about this topic many times and warned about the risks of letting unsavory governments have access to personal information, but the Obama Administration – with the support of some Republicans who think government power is more important than individual rights – is actively pushing this agenda.
The White House has even endorsed the idea of the United States being part of a so-called Convention on Mutual Administrative Assistance in Tax Matters, even though that would require the sharing of large amounts of personal financial data with thuggish and corrupt regimes such as Argentina, Azerbaijan, China, Greece, Mexico, Nigeria, Russia, and Saudi Arabia!
I’m sure Vladimir Putin very much appreciates this insider access so he can monitor dissidents and track political opponents. His government even signed onto a recent G-20 Communique that endorsed automatic information-sharing.
Heck, there’s even a Russian heading up the Financial Action Task Force, which is endlessly pushing to give governments untrammeled access to private information. FATF even wants banks and other financial institutions to spy on customers, regardless of whether there’s the slightest evidence of any wrongdoing.
The general mindset in Washington is that we should all bury our heads in the sand and blithely allow this massive accumulation of power and information by governments. After all, Putin and other thugs would never abuse this system, right?

Senator Paul battles the statists
Fortunately, at least one lawmaker is trying to throw sand in the gears. Like Horatius at the bridge, who single-handedly thwarted an invasion of Rome in 509 BC, Senator Paul is objecting to this massive invasion of privacy.
He has this old-fashioned appreciation for the Constitution and doesn’t think government should have carte blanche to access private financial data. He even – gasp! – thinks that government power should be restrained by the 4th Amendment and that there should be due process legal protections for individuals.
No wonder the DC establishment doesn’t like him.
One example of this phenomenon is that Senator Paul has placed a “hold” on some tax treaties. Here are some excerpts from a recent article in Politico.
Paul for years has single-handedly blocked an obscure U.S.-Swiss tax treaty that lawmakers, prosecutors, diplomats and banks say makes the difference between U.S. law enforcement rooting out the names of a few hundred fat-cat tax evaders — and many thousands more. …International tax experts for years have seethed over Paul’s block on the Swiss and several other tax treaties. These sorts of mundane tax protocols used to get approved by unanimous consent without anyone batting an eyelash — until Paul came to town.
These pacts are “mundane” to officials who think there shouldn’t be any restrictions on the power of governments.
Fortunately, Senator Paul has a different perspective.
Kentucky’s tea party darling says the treaty infringes on privacy rights. …Paul, a libertarian Republican widely believed to be eyeing a 2016 presidential run, says his hold stems from concerns about Fourth Amendment protections against “unreasonable search and seizure.” “These are people that are alleged, not convicted of doing anything wrong,” Paul said a few weeks ago. “I don’t think you should have everybody’s information from their bank. There should be some process: accusations and proof that you’ve committed a crime.”
The article also notes that Senator Paul is one of the few lawmakers to fight back against the egregious FATCA legislation.
Paul’s protest is also linked to his abhorrence of the soon-to-take-effect Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act, which will force foreign banks to disclose U.S. account information to the IRS, and domestic banks to reciprocate to other nations’ revenue departments. …the senator has legislation to repeal FATCA and hesitates to support a treaty that enables a law he views as U.S. government overreach.
I don’t know how long Senator Paul can withstand the pressure in his lonely fight for individual rights, but I’m glad he’s waging the battle.
Even the Swiss government and Swiss banks have thrown in the towel, having decided that they have no choice but to weaken their nation’s human rights laws on financial privacy because of threats of financial protectionism by the United States.
So let’s give three cheers to our modern-day Horatius, a very rare elected official who is doing the right thing for the right reason.
For more information on the importance of financial privacy, here’s my video on the moral case for tax havens.
P.S. I shared some good jokes about Keynesian economics a few weeks ago.
Now, via Cafe Hayek, I have a great cartoon showing the fancy equation that left-wing economists use when they tell us that the economy will grow faster if there’s a bigger burden of government spending.
Now you can see how the Congressional Budget Office puts together its silly estimates.
Indeed, Chuck Asay even produced a cartoon on CBO’s fancy methodology.
The next step is to find the secret equation that CBO uses when it publishes nonsensical analysis implying that growth is maximized when tax rates are 100 percent.
But to be fair, the politicians who pay their salaries want them to justify bigger government, so should we expect anything else?
[…] There is at least one Republican who is very principled on the issue of the […]
[…] Senator Rand Paul is one of the few lawmakers in Washington fighting on the right side of this […]
[…] P.S. Senator Rand Paul is one of the few heroes on this issue. […]
[…] Rand Paul is one of the few heroes on this […]
[…] Which is why I’m very happy that Rand Paul is leading the fight against a scheme for a global tax […]
[…] Rand Paul, like Horatius at the bridge protecting Rome, is throwing sand in the gears and isn’t allowing easy passage by the full […]
[…] We should be very thankful that Senator Rand Paul is standing tall in the fight against nosy and destructive governments on this […]
[…] Especially if their models are based on Keynesian theory, as shown in the cartoon in this post. […]
[…] only a handful of lawmakers, most notably Senator Rand Paul, are making noise on this […]
[…] Senator Rand Paul is one of the few lawmakers fighting to protect Americans from having their information shared with foreign […]
[…] Senator Rand Paul is one of the few lawmakers fighting to protect Americans from having their information shared with foreign […]
[…] the law is a disaster and that pressure is growing to ameliorate its negative effects, but we need more lawmakers like Rand Paul if we want to translate unhappiness into […]
[…] Yet very few politicians are willing to fight FATCA because they’re afraid that their opponents will engage in demagoguery and accuse them of being in favor of tax evasion. Senator Rand Paul is an admirable exception. […]
[…] Yet very few politicians are willing to fight FATCA because they’re afraid that their opponents will engage in demagoguery and accuse them of being in favor of tax evasion. Senator Rand Paul is an admirable exception. […]
Dr. Ron Paul:
“Last week Congress overwhelmingly passed a bill approving a billion dollars in aid to Ukraine and more sanctions on Russia. The bill will likely receive the president’s signature within days. If you think this is the last time US citizens will have their money sent to Ukraine, you should think again. This is only the beginning.”
“Aid to Ukraine Is a Bad Deal For All”
http://www.strategic-culture.org/news/2014/04/01/aid-to-ukraine-is-a-bad-deal-for-all.html
it’s complicated… very complicated… this piece offers insight into the dangers yet to be faced in Ukraine… the analyst is good… and offers a perspective not seen in establishment western media… if you are interested in a different take on a very dangerous situation… this read might be beneficial…
http://vineyardsaker.blogspot.com/2014/03/was-first-shot-of-upcoming-ukrainian.html
for an alternate view of reality…
“Why Putin has Obama by the Short Hairs”
by Blacklisted:
http://twistedlittlethings.com/tlt/2014/03/25/why-putin-has-obama-by-the-short-hairs/#more-1986
Mr. Putin has some of the best strategic thinkers on the planet advising him… and he has the good sense to listen and impalement their advice… the Crimea was annexed to assure the Russian fleet unfettered access to the Mediterranean… cultural and economic ties with mother Russia were also a critical factors… as well as Crimean oil and gas deposits in the black sea… it was a no-brainer… but it would never have happened if western interests had not actively worked for over a decade to destabilize an elected government in Ukraine… and planned to use western influence to undermine Russian strategic interests in the area… President Putin has no intention of further action unless the current government in Kiev threatens ethnic Russians in southern and eastern Ukraine with violence… Ukraine will become a economic basket case… one which Russia will be pleased to unload on the west… punitive sanctions against Russia will be the result… and Russia will move closer to China… and of course… Mr. Putin will exploit western stupidity and laggardness wherever he can find it… and it does seem plentiful…
“the devil jumped up on a hickory stump… and said “boy… let me tell you what… now you play pretty good fiddle son… but give the devil his due… I bet a fiddle of gold against your soul… cause I think I’m better than you…”
the real question is can Rand Paul sit across the table from Vladimir Putin… look him in the eye… and say what he means…………….. and mean what he says…
Excellent post…..Russia’s moves are all part of Putin’s deoffshorization which, as far as I have read, have multiple objectives. Firstly, he wants Russian money in Russia to develop the economy and to pay taxes. He is not a fan of wealth Russians buying up properties in the west including football clubs and basketball teams etc. Secondly, he warned the oligarchs to get out of having assets abroad when he returned to the Kremlin because he feared that they could lose their assets if sanctions were imposed as has happened based on his policy decisions. There are some who think and argue that Putin is happy with the sanctions because it will make the wealthy Russians think twice about having offshore assets when sanctions can destroy them and he gets to make the point that their money is safer within Russia. I sort of this that there is some truth in that. However, the other issue which is less benign is that by having the funds in Russia, the oligarchs owe the safe-custody of their wealth to Putin. If they cross him, he can destroy them using state power. So there are many facets to what Russia is pushing and underlying currents which are unseen…
Carlyle
Your payroll deductions become propaganda as to why you need more government dirigisme.
Your tax dollars at work!
It’s not evil conspiracy. Just a matter of understanding where intrinsic interests lay.