I wrote last week about the lunacy of a tax system that created the conditions that led to the death of Eric Garner in New York City.
But I wrote that column in the context of how high tax rates lead to tax avoidance and tax evasion. Let’s now zoom out and look at the bigger picture.
Using the Garner case as a springboard, George Will explains that we have too many laws.
Garner died at the dangerous intersection of something wise, known as “broken windows” policing, and something worse than foolish: decades of overcriminalization. …when more and more behaviors are criminalized, there are more and more occasions for police, who embody the state’s monopoly on legitimate violence, and who fully participate in humanity’s flaws, to make mistakes. Harvey Silverglate, a civil liberties attorney, titled his 2009 book “Three Felonies a Day” to indicate how easily we can fall afoul of the United States’ metastasizing body of criminal laws. Professor Douglas Husak of Rutgers University says that approximately 70 percent of American adults have, usually unwittingly, committed a crime for which they could be imprisoned. …The scandal of mass incarceration is partly produced by the frivolity of the political class, which uses the multiplication of criminal offenses as a form of moral exhibitionism. This, like Eric Garner’s death, is a pebble in the mountain of evidence that American government is increasingly characterized by an ugly and sometimes lethal irresponsibility.
I don’t know if Americans actually do commit three felonies each day, and I also don’t know if 70 percent of us have committed offenses punishable by jail time, but I certainly wouldn’t be surprised to learn that these numbers are correct.
They may even be understated.
Indeed, when I share horrifying examples of government thuggery, these generally involve brutal and over-zealous enforcement of things that oftentimes shouldn’t be against the law in the first place.
This Eric Allie cartoon is a good example, and definitely will get added to my collection of images that capture the essence of government.
In other words, George Will wasn’t exaggerating when he wrote that, “American government is increasingly characterized by an ugly and sometimes lethal irresponsibility.”
Writing for Bloomberg, Professor Steven Carter of Yale Law School has a similar perspective.
I always counsel my first-year students never to support a law they are not willing to kill to enforce. …I remind them that the police go armed to enforce the will of the state, and if you resist, they might kill you. I wish this caution were only theoretical. It isn’t. …It’s not just cigarette tax laws that can lead to the death of those the police seek to arrest. It’s every law. Libertarians argue that we have far too many laws, and the Garner case offers evidence that they’re right. …it is unavoidable that there will be situations where police err on the side of too much violence rather than too little. Better training won’t lead to perfection. But fewer laws would mean fewer opportunities for official violence to get out of hand.
Amen.
A just society should have very few laws, and those laws should be both easy to understand and they should focus on protecting life, liberty, and property.
Sadly, that’s not a good description for what now exists in America. Professor Carter explains.
…federal law alone includes more than 3,000 crimes, fewer than half of which found in the Federal Criminal Code. The rest are scattered through other statutes. A citizen who wants to abide by the law has no quick and easy way to find out what the law actually is — a violation of the traditional principle that the state cannot punish without fair notice. In addition to these statutes, he writes, an astonishing 300,000 or more federal regulations may be enforceable through criminal punishment in the discretion of an administrative agency. Nobody knows the number for sure. Husak cites estimates that more than 70 percent of American adults have committed a crime that could lead to imprisonment. …making an offense criminal also means that the police will go armed to enforce it. Overcriminalization matters… Every new law requires enforcement; every act of enforcement includes the possibility of violence. …Don’t ever fight to make something illegal unless you’re willing to risk the lives of your fellow citizens to get your way.
Which is a good description of why I’m a libertarian notwithstanding my personal conservatism.
I don’t like drugs, but I’m not willing to let someone else get killed because they have a different perspective.
I don’t like gambling, but I don’t want another person to die because they want to play cards.
I don’t like prostitution, but it’s awful to think someone could lose his life because he paid for sex.
This Glenn McCoy cartoon summarizes what’s happening far too often in this country.
P.S. Since this has been a depressing topic, let’s close by switching to some good news.
I’ve previously explained why I’m somewhat optimistic on the future of the Second Amendment. Well, the folks at Pew Research have some new polling data that bolsters my optimism.
Here’s one result that put a smile on my face.
And here’s a breakdown that’s also encouraging. Note how blacks have become much more supportive of gun rights.
I guess this means “Stretch” and “R.J.” have a lot more support than just two years ago.
And it’s worth noting that cops have the same perspective.
In other words, these are not fun times for gun grabbers.
[…] big-picture assumptionthat guides my views on law enforcement, and that’s the notion that there should be far fewer laws (for examples, see here, here, and […]
[…] assumption that guides my views on law enforcement, and that’s the notion that there should be far fewer laws (for examples, see here, here, and […]
[…] of the best political cartoons I’ve ever seen was this gem from Glenn […]
[…] want fewer foolish laws so police can concentrate on protecting life, liberty, and […]
[…] In a column for FEE, David Rosenthal addresses the same topic of overcriminalization. […]
[…] over-criminalization a whole new […]
[…] very few laws, mostly at the state level, with the goal of protecting life, liberty, and […]
[…] bottom line is that Kaepernick and the other players have identified a very real and very important […]
[…] be sure, I don’t think jury nullification is the ideal way of dealing with over-criminalization and abusive law enforcement. It would be much better to repeal bad laws and get rid of the bad […]
[…] so long as bad laws (or incomprehensible laws) exist and government officials sometimes act dishonorably, we should support juries being the last […]
[…] a broader point is that we simply have too many laws. Harvey Silverglate estimates that the average person unknowingly commits three felonies per […]
[…] And I’m not talking about government killing you for selling an untaxed cigarette. […]
[…] very upset when I read about low-income minorities suffering because politicians at the local level use cops to generate revenue rather than to protect against bad […]
[…] it’s also worth noting that the over-criminalization of society creates opportunities for bad people in government to target minorities (or other groups that fall […]
I believe in law and order. My only beef is with people who want to use government power to micromanage every aspect of our lives. Democrats and republicans are wrong in their own ways regarding certain policy views.
[…] And that also means getting rid of laws that don’t make sense. […]
[…] is something that we’ve already discussed. I made the distinction just the other day between real crimes (which involve an infringement on […]
[…] we have far too many laws and they are used as back-door taxes on the […]
[…] we have far too many laws and they are used as back-door taxes on the […]
[…] dangers of law enforcement being turned into a revenue-generating machine. I touched on that issue here, but read this Radley Balko article if you really want to understand how low-income people suffer […]
[…] dangers of law enforcement being turned into a revenue-generating machine. I touched on that issue here, but read this Radley Balko article if you really want to understand how low-income people suffer […]
“Surgeon General Confirmation a MASSIVE BLOW to Pro Gun Groups”
12.16.2014
Yehuda Remer
http://www.truthrevolt.org/news/surgeon-general-confirmation-massive-blow-pro-gun-groups
we could to back to the laws and regulations that were in effect in December of 1950… and still have a viable and productive society…. a few technology related updates… and we would be good to go…. every time some politician is allowed to enact a knee-jerk or corniest inspired law… or a bureaucrat passes a new set of regulations… somewhere in America… someone loses a bit more personal or professional freedom… if the trend continues… at some point our society will be totally hamstrung by government… the costs will be unacceptable… and in all likelihood… our society…. and our union in it’s current form will not survive…
Attention Dan Mitchell,
Dear Dan,
I share all your views about the destructive nature of Big Government.
However, one question:
You recently showed the Richard Rahn curve and showed how the US government is now 41% of GDP.
Some economists told me that it was maximum 23%. I suppose the 41% includes states and municipalities but maybe you could clarify.
Kind regards
Marc
Marc Faber
Marc Faber Limited
Suite 801, The Workstation
43 Lyndhurst Terrace
Central, Hong Kong
T: 852-2801 5410
F: 852 2845 9192
http://www.gloomboomdoom.com
Reblogged this on Rnm101's Blog.
“The essence of Government is power; and power, lodged as it must be in human hands, will ever be liable to abuse.”
– James Madison
Reblogged this on Foodforthethinkers's Blog.
Too many laws, too many regulations, too many taxes, too many bureaucrats
https://dickrichardsky.wordpress.com/2014/12/07/government-is-force-a-fundamental-contradiction-in-the-liberal-theology/