I’ve already explained why leftists must be depressed about their failure to restrict private gun ownership.
They’ve suffered brutal electoral setbacks in Colorado, and more and more states have strengthened the right to keep and bear arms.
Moreover, it’s hard for them to claim their agenda is about safer streets when cops overwhelmingly reject the premises of the anti-gun zealots.
And they also have to deal with something very troubling that further undermines their campaign against the Second Amendment.
That troubling thing is facts and data.
Because the more information that we learn, the more evidence we have – as John Lott often reminds us – that more guns equal less crime.
Writing for the Wall Street Journal, Jason Riley peruses some new data from the FBI. Here are some key excerpts.
A new FBI report says that violent crime continues to fall nationwide, which might annoy liberals because gun purchases continue to rise. In the first six months of 2013, murders fell by nearly 7 percent, compared with the same period in 2012. Aggravated assaults fell by 6.6 percent, and robberies are down 1.8 percent. “All of the offenses in the violent crime category—murder and non-negligent manslaughter, forcible rape, aggravated assault, and robbery—showed decreases when data from the first six months of 2013 were compared with data from the first six months of 2012,” according to the FBI. Overall, violent crime in the U.S. fell by 5.4 percent. …The left likes to link violent crime to the proliferation of guns in the country, so it’s worth noting that the crime reductions described in the FBI report correlate with a steady increase in firearm sales.
But that’s not all.
It’s also worth noting that gun-ownership rates in the Midwest (39 percent) and South (50 percent) far exceed gun-ownership rates in the Northeast (22 percent), yet violent crime is down more in the Midwest and South than it is in the Northeast, according to the FBI statistics. And rural areas, where gun-ownership rates also are higher than average, saw a larger reduction in violent crime that metropolitan areas, where gun-ownership rates are lower than average. Not that gun-control zealots, who are so certain of a causal link between firearms and violent crime rates, care about such details.
Gee, what a surprise.
When more law-abiding people have guns, the bad guys are more skittish.
Hmmm…sounds like someone took the IQ test I devised for criminals and liberals.
But we have more good news.
It seems that Americans are not sheep meekly waiting to be fleeced of their constitutional freedom and liberties.
In Connecticut, where reprehensible politicians exploited a school shooting to impose restrictions on the Second Amendment, it appears that many citizens are – in effect – telling them to bugger off.
Here are some excerpts from a story in the Hartford Courant.
Everyone knew there would be some gun owners flouting the law that legislators hurriedly passed last April, requiring residents to register all military-style rifles with state police by Dec. 31. But few thought the figures would be this bad. By the end of 2013, state police had received 47,916 applications for assault weapons certificates, Lt. Paul Vance said. An additional 2,100 that were incomplete could still come in. That 50,000 figure could be as little as 15 percent of the rifles classified as assault weapons owned by Connecticut residents, according to estimates by people in the industry… And that means as of Jan. 1, Connecticut has very likely created tens of thousands of newly minted criminals — perhaps 100,000 people…who have broken no other laws.
This story makes me proud to be an American.
We’ve seen some polling data that shows there would be widespread civil disobedience if politicians tried to confiscate guns, but I wondered whether people would be more willing to acquiesce to preliminary steps such as the Connecticut registration plan.
So it’s great to see that tens of thousands of them are resisting.
P.S. As I’ve noted before, anyone who cares about this issue should read these observations from a genuine firearms expert.
And if you have left-wing friends, there are two posts that may convince them to be rational about guns. Justin Cronin explains here that restrictions on gun ownership undermined his ability to protect his family. And Jeffrey Goldberg looked at the evidence and concluded that guns make people safer.
P.P.S. If you simply want a laugh or two, this funny video shows that our left-wing friends are incapable of understanding this topic.
For more gun control humor, check out this joke comparing California with other parts of America, this interview with a general is worth sharing (presumably an urban legend, but could be true), and here’s a t-shirt that I’m putting on my Christmas list.
[…] P.S. Since we’re sharing good news on guns, here’s a heartwarming story about civil disobedience. But this isn’t about civil disobedience solely by gun owners, as we’ve seen in Connecticut. […]
[…] explained on several occasions (here, here, and here) that we can be optimistic about the fight to preserve our rights to keep and bear […]
[…] already written about such efforts in Colorado and Connecticut, and the Wall Street Journal reports on what’s now happening in New Mexico and […]
[…] time you get called for jury duty, you know what to do if the government is persecuting someone for owning a gun, doing drugs, selling sex, gambling, or anything else that doesn’t involve an actual […]
[…] we have firsthand evidence from Colorado and Connecticut that gun owners engage in widespread civil […]
[…] has veered sharply in the wrong direction on fiscal policy, I must say that I’m proud that residents have engaged in civil disobedience against the state’s anti-gun […]
[…] examples of civil disobedience comes from Connecticut, where more than 80 percent of owners flouted a state law to register so-called assault […]
[…] more importantly, I noted that gun control doesn’t succeed because ordinary Americans are very diligent about protecting their constitutional […]
[…] more importantly, I noted that gun control doesn’t succeed because ordinary Americans are very diligent about protecting their constitutional […]
[…] has veered sharply in the wrong direction on fiscal policy, I must say that I’m proud that residents are engaging in civil disobedience against the state’s anti-gun […]
[…] state governments goagainst the trend and try to trample on constitutional rights to gun ownership, politicians get tossed out of office and gun owners engage in massive civil […]
[…] governments go against the trend and try to trample on constitutional rights to gun ownership, politicians get tossed out of office and gun owners engage in massive civil […]
[…] governments go against the trend and try to trample on constitutional rights to gun ownership, politicians get tossed out of office and gun owners engage in massive civil […]
[…] is that future gun control efforts in California will probably run into the same problems that have thwarted the schemes of despicable politicians in Connecticut. Three cheers for the Americans who disobey bad […]
[…] of obeying bad gun control laws, with evidence of massive resistance to bad laws in states such as Connecticut, Colorado, and New […]
[…] Next thing you know, these kids will grow up to engage in other forms of civil disobedience, just like Arizona drivers and Connecticut gun owners. […]
[…] P.S. Since we’re sharing good news on guns, here’s a heartwarming story about civil disobedience. But this isn’t about civil disobedience solely by gun owners, as we’ve seen in Connecticut. […]
Let me get this straight Kj947, you claim correlation does not equal causation and then you proceed to claim that the US homicide rate must be higher due to access to guns?
You’ve pretty much destroyed your own argument. 🙂
As for your cross-sectional analysis between countries, you’ve failed to adjust for all the relevant factors that could contribute to a nation’s reported homicide rate:
http://rboatright.blogspot.com/2013/03/comparing-england-or-uk-murder-rates.html
Try doing some longitudinal analysis for once.
The main issue with the entire article is that you’re assuming that because there is correlation (I will take your word for it) between increased gun purchases and decreased crime rate that the increased gun purchases CAUSES the decreased crime rate. Thus, there is a fundamental flaw in your argument as it’s a key rule in stats: correlation does not imply causation. For example, with all the information the govt has about you, maybe they are just getting better at crime prevention and that gun ownership has increased due to people being afraid of being denied a gun in the future. (Not saying this is why just an example)
Oh and by the way, a liberal is not a “leftist”. How you can claim to advocate freedom then berate a liberal I do not know. “International liberty”… Those damn liberals!
Make of this what you will: 4.8 homicides per 100k in US. Compare that to a similar country in terms of culture, I.e. the UK: 1.2. Or other “civilised” countries (which the US can barely claim to be due to it’s ridiculous extraordinary rendition policies etc) such as Germany: 0.8.
“USDA Requests .40 Semi-Automatic Weapons”
“Submachine guns, .40 Cal. S&W, ambidextrous safety, semi-automatic or 2 shot bursts”
http://www.truthrevolt.org/news/usda-requests-40-semi-automatic-weapons
“whom are they planning to go to war with?”
[…] What’s happening in Connecticut is merely one example of this wonderful form of civil disobedience. […]
Why is Ct. not deporting illegals……. instead of.worrying about guns that law abiding citizens have…. go after allthe gangs guns you want… after all anyone with common sense knows gang members and fellons will be first in line to register their stollen guns…. and when you take guns these criminals and illegals will stillhave their guns.
How many illegal.immigrants in CT. are registering for citizenship talk about true criminals. But wait the government feels it is fine for illegal immigration to continue out of control……why do we have DHS when 200 illegals can come into Texas at any given time. Wonder how many Middle East terrorists come through Mexico
[…] What’s happening in Connecticut is merely one example of this wonderful form of civil disobedience. […]
[…] control is misguided. And ordinary citizens would engage in massive civil disobedience (as we’re seeing in Connecticut) if the thugs in government tried to confiscate […]
[…] is misguided. And ordinary citizens would engage in massive civil disobedience (as we’re seeing in Connecticut) if the thugs in government tried to confiscate […]
[…] The biggest hypocrisy of the gun-grabbers seems to be “Bodyguards for me, no self-defense for thee, peasant!” (Note: My apologies, folks, but the reblogged post doesn’t seem to be showing up, right now. You can find the original here.) […]
Reblogged this on BLOGGING BAD ~ DICK.G: AMERICAN ! and commented:
GYG!
Reblogged this on Brittius.com.
Let’s not forget the technological revolution that is making it as easy to acquire a firearm as doing a simple web search:
The best is yet to come. Gun control probably won’t be a political issue in the next few decades, so far as possession is concerned.
Technology + changes in public opinion = Bliss.
the progressive intelligentsia must be so distraught… their little yellow smiley faces will turn to frowns…
it’s so sad..
Reblogged this on Public Secrets and commented:
The biggest hypocrisy of the gun-grabbers seems to be “Baduguards for me, no self-defense for thee, peasant!”
Bang on!
Reblogged this on Gds44's Blog.