Since I’m a public finance economist, I realize I’m supposed to focus on big-picture issues such as tax reform and entitlement reform. And I do beat those issues to death, so I obviously care about controlling the size and power of government.
But I like to think I’m also a decent human being. And this is why I get even more agitated when politicians and bureaucrats engage in thuggish behavior against comparatively powerless citizens.
Some of the worst examples of government thuggery are the result of “asset forfeiture,” which happens when governments confiscate the property of people who haven’t been convicted of any crime. Heck, sometimes they’re not even charged with any crime.
*Such as when the government wanted to steal someone’s truck because a different person was arrested for drunk driving.
*Such as when the government tried to steal the bond money a family has collected to bail out a relative.
*Such as when the government seized nearly $400,000 of a business owner’s money because it was in the possession of an armored car company suspected of wrongdoing.
*Such as when the government sought to confiscate an office building from the owner because a tenant was legally selling medical marijuana.
*Such as when the government killed a man as part of an anti-gambling investigation undertaken in hopes of using asset forfeiture to steal other people’s cash.
But we do have a bit of good news. All these horror stories seem to be causing a backlash.
Fox News has a very revealing article on how this system is under assault. The story begins by explaining how asset forfeiture is an open invitation for abuse and grossly inconsistent with the Constitution.
Civil forfeiture is when police and prosecutors seize property, cars or cash from someone they suspect of wrongdoing. …authorities don’t have to prove guilt, file charges or obtain a conviction before seizing private property. Critics say it is a process ripe for abuse, and one which leaves citizens little means of fighting back. “You breed a culture of ‘take first, ask questions later,’” Larry Salzman, an attorney with the Institute for Justice, told FoxNews.com. “It’s thuggish behavior.” …civil forfeitures represent a dangerous area of the U.S. justice system where, by law, a person is supposed to be presumed innocent until proven guilty and not the other way around.
The report from Fox cites a couple of reasons why asset forfeiture is misguided. One major problem is that it gives cops a budgetary incentive to steal.
In Tennessee, local law enforcement agencies get to keep 100 percent of all property seized through civil forfeiture – an incentive some say can tempt police to go after property for the wrong reasons.
Fortunately, people are now fighting this horrible procedure. The story explains that a former law enforcement official who is now a state lawmaker, Barrett Rich, is trying to reform Tennessee’s awful bill.
And Minnesota actually has eliminated this odious tactic. Here are some excerpts from a Forbes column.
In a big win for property rights and due process, Minnesota Gov. Mark Dayton signed a bill yesterday to curb an abusive—and little known—police practice called civil forfeiture. Unlike criminal forfeiture, under civil forfeiture someone does not have to be convicted of a crime, or even charged with one, to permanently lose his or her cash, car or home. …Now the government can only take property if it obtains a criminal conviction or its equivalent, like if a property owner pleads guilty to a crime or becomes an informant. The bill also shifts the burden of proof onto the government, where it rightfully belongs.
Wyoming’s state legislature also is considering reform, so there are positive developments in many different states.
For more information, click here for a very good introductory video about civil asset forfeiture.
If you like videos, click here for a horrifying video about the government stealing $17,000 from an innocent man.
And here’s another video, this one about the government stealing money from a family grocery store.
Last but not least, if you want to get more upset, here are some additional examples of non-forfeiture related government thuggery.
- A story of vicious IRS persecution.
- A woman jailed overnight because she let her kids play outside.
- Threatening to send a woman to jail because someone whistled at a whale.
- A video about how the EPA tried – and fortunately failed – to destroy a family.
- A story about the Justice Department’s discriminatory attack on a hapless homeowner.
- The government treating child molesters more leniently than people who accidentally omit irrelevant info from forms.
- Bureaucrats in Indiana conducting a spite-motivated legal attack against a family that saved a baby deer.
- A local government in Virginia unfairly trying to destroy an organic farmer.
- Statists must dislike organic farms because Texas bureaucrats conducted a paramilitary raid on one of them.
- Park Service bureaucrats threatening a business if it allowed tourists to use bathroom facilities.
- Last but not least, don’t forget all the nutty – and often thuggish – examples of anti-gun political correctness in schools.
Gee, it’s almost enough to make a person a libertarian!
[…] sometimes without even charging someone with a […]
[…] Local law enforcement needs to stop policing for profit. […]
[…] of good news, some governments around the country are curtailing this venal […]
[…] you still are not convinced, today we’re going to look at seven stories about so-called civil asset forfeiture, which is a sanitized term. Most people call it […]
[…] But I know that prohibition is a costly failure that leads to an abusive government (such as intrusive money-laundering laws and Orwellian asset-forfeiture laws). […]
[…] But I know that prohibition is a costly failure that leads to abusive government (such as intrusive money-laundering laws and Orwellian asset-forfeiture laws). […]
[…] his truck because Civil asset forfeiture basically gives bureaucrats a license to steal. I’m not joking, though I wish I […]
[…] some cases, where government is doing bad things (stealing property, subsidizing big corporations, fleecing poor people, etc), I actually favor […]
[…] asset forfeiture led to a tiny step in the right direction by the Obama Administration. And there have been positive reforms at the state […]
[…] asset forfeiture led to a tiny step in the right direction by the Obama Administration. And there have been positive reforms at the state […]
[…] a process called “civil asset forfeiture” and it enables government officials to confiscate your property even if you have not been convicted of a crime. Or even charged with a […]
[…] some cases, where government is doing bad things (stealing property, subsidizing big corporations, fleecing poor people, etc), I actually favor […]
[…] War on Drugs. And he’s also a supporter of “asset forfeiture,” which occurs when governments steal money and property from citizens without convicting them of any crime. Or sometimes without even charging them with a […]
[…] some states are seeking to curtail this evil […]
[…] remember that this is just a victory in one battle. We won’t win the war until the disgusting practice of civil asset forfeiture is […]
[…] remember that this is just a victory in one battle. We won’t win the war until the disgusting practice of civil asset forfeiture is […]
[…] remember that this is just a victory in one battle. We won’t win the war until the disgusting practice of civil asset forfeiture is […]
[…] happens when the government arbitrarily seizes your money and/or property without convicting you of a crime. Or even without charging you with a […]
[…] topic is about a more specialized version of theft by government, which technically is called civil asset forfeiture but more accurately should be referred to as policing for […]
[…] topic is about a more specialized version of theft by government, which technically is called civil asset forfeiture but more accurately should be referred to as policing for […]
[…] topic is about a more specialized version of theft by government, which technically is called civil asset forfeiture but more accurately should be referred to as policing for […]
[…] (And it’s led to horrible policies such as intrusive money-laundering laws and Orwellian asset-forfeiture laws). […]
[…] https://danieljmitchell.wordpress.com/2014/05/15/no-more-stealing-by-government-a-long-overdue-attack… Until "asset forfeiture" is repealed everywhere, no one will be safe from government theft.Fortunately, people are now fighting this horrible procedure. The story explains that a former law enforcement official who is now a state lawmaker, Barrett Rich, is trying to reform Tennessee’s awful bill.Driving I-40 in TN is an invitation to be stopped and ALL of your cash taken.But TN isn't the only place. It is everywhere. Here are the STATES grades:https://www.ij.org/asset-forfeiture-report-grade-detail Here's how grades were determined:https://www.ij.org/part-ii-grading-the-states-2 And the states with an A, B, or C… I wouldn't live in.The "trade-offs" are horrendous… whether they be cold, queers or Agenda 21. […]
Reblogged this on Gds44's Blog.
Reblogged this on Neverending1's Blog and commented:
Your government at work.
[…] Dan Mitchell writes about the abomination that is civil asset forfeiture. […]
I agree that asset forfeiture has gone way beyond the original intent.
However, back in 1979, I was on Gov. King’s Management Task Force (Mass.) and made the recommendation to pay informants 50% of the take on confiscated untaxed cigarettes coming from low tax states of North Carolina and New Hampshire. The idea was to increase the risk of seizure beyond the point where the shipper would stop shipping, not to actually confiscate cigarettes.
That idea went nowhere, because it was tagged as the “Pay the Finks Recommendation”. Since many (/most) of the Massachusetts pols were crooks themselves, they wanted nothing to do with paying stool pigeons.
As much as I may agree with your position, you are a serial link-jacker. You place other people’s work on your page, then link to it time and again in the emails you send to us.
I have to wade through dozens of links to your page for information that should have been linked to by the creator.
Really unappealing part of your online business.
very goog
Sent from my iPad
>