This Institute for Justice video shows what happens when bad laws are enacted (often using the excuse of fighting crime) that give government unchecked power.
Asset Forfeiture Laws: A License to Steal?
April 2, 2010 by Dan Mitchell
Posted in Crime, Government Thuggery | Tagged Crime, Government Thuggery | 50 Comments
50 Responses
Leave a Reply
This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.
-
Join 4,861 other subscribers
-
Recent Posts
Pages
- 100 Tragic Years of Communism
- Bureaucrat Hall of Fame
- Bureaucrat Humor (pending)
- Collectivism Humor
- Five Things About Me
- Government in Cartoons and Images
- Gun Control Satire
- Honest Leftists
- Libertarian Humor
- Libertarian Quandaries
- Mocking Europeans
- Moocher Hall of Fame
- Poverty Hucksters
- Sex and Government
- Victims of Government
Visitors (beginning December 23, 2010)
- Big Government Bureaucracy Bureaucrats Class warfare Competitiveness Constitution Corporate income tax Corporate tax Corruption Crime Cronyism Debt Deficit Dependency Donald Trump Economics Education England Entitlements Europe Fiscal Crisis Fiscal Policy Flat Tax Free Markets Government-run healthcare Government intervention Government Spending Government stupidity Government Thuggery Government waste Gun control Health Care Health Reform Higher Taxes Humor International bureaucracy IRS Jobs Joe Biden Keynesian Economics Laffer Curve Libertarianism Liberty Local government News Appearance Obama Obamacare OECD Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development Political Humor Politics Poverty Protectionism Redistribution Regulation Republicans Socialism States Statism stimulus Supply-side economics Taxation Tax avoidance Tax Competition Tax Haven Tax Increase Tax Increases Tax Reform Trade Unemployment United Kingdom Value-Added Tax VAT Welfare Welfare State
Archives
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
Recent Comments
Categories
- 2nd Amendment
- Academic Bias
- African-Americans
- Al Gore
- Alarmism
- Argentina
- Arizona
- Asset Forfeiture
- Atlas Shrugged
- Australia
- Austrian Economics
- Ayn Rand
- Bailout
- Balanced Budget
- Barney Frank
- Baseball
- Basic Income
- Belgium
- Bernanke
- Bernie Sanders
- Big business
- Big Government
- Bob Dole Award
- Boondoggle
- Boris Johnson
- Botswana
- Brain drain
- Brazil
- Brexit
- Bulldogs
- Bureaucracy
- Bureaucrats
- Bush
- Buttigieg
- California
- Canada
- Capital Gains Tax
- Carbon Tax
- cash for clunkers
- Cato Institute
- Cayman Islands
- CBO
- Center for Freedom and Prosperity
- Central planning
- Centralization
- Charity
- Chile
- China
- Chris Christie
- Civil Disobedience
- Class warfare
- Climate change
- Clinton
- Cold War
- Collectivism
- Colorado
- Communism
- Competitiveness
- Congress
- Congressional Budget Office
- Connecticut
- Constitution
- Convergence
- Coolidge
- Corbyn
- Corporate income tax
- Corporate tax
- Corruption
- Cost-Benefit Analysis
- Creative Destruction
- Crime
- Cronyism
- Cuba
- Dan Hannan
- David Cameron
- Dawgs
- Death Tax
- Debt
- Deferral
- Deficit
- Delaware
- Democrats
- Demographics
- Denmark
- Dependency
- Deposit Insurance
- Discrimination
- Donald Trump
- Double Taxation
- Drug War
- Earmarks
- Easy money
- Economic Rankings
- Economics
- Education
- EITC
- Election
- Elitism
- Elizabeth Warren
- Eminent Domain
- England
- Entitlements
- Environmentalism
- Equality
- Estonia
- Euro
- Europe
- European Commission
- European Union
- Executive pay
- Fair Tax
- Fannie Mae
- Fascism
- Fatal conceit
- FATCA
- Federal Reserve
- Federalism
- Financial Crisis
- Financial Privacy
- Finland
- Fiscal Crisis
- Fiscal Policy
- Flat Tax
- Florida
- Food and Drug Administration
- food nazi
- Food Stamps
- Foreign Aid
- Foreign Policy
- France
- Freddie Mac
- Free Markets
- Free Speech
- Free State Project
- Freedom
- Gas Tax
- Geithner
- General Motors
- Georgia
- Germany
- Gingrich
- Global Taxation
- Global warming
- Gold Standard
- Gordon Brown
- Government Inefficiency
- Government intervention
- Government Spending
- Government stupidity
- Government Thuggery
- Great Depression
- Greece
- Green New Deal
- Gross domestic product
- Gun control
- Harmonization
- Hayek
- Health Care
- Health Reform
- Higher Taxes
- Hillary Clinton
- Homeschooling
- Hong Kong
- Hoover
- Housing
- HUD
- Human Rights
- Humor
- Hungary
- Hypocrisy
- Iceland
- Illinois
- Immigration
- Income tax
- India
- Industrial Policy
- Inequality
- Inflation
- Infrastructure
- International bureaucracy
- International Criminal Court
- International Monetary Fund
- International Taxation
- Iowa
- Iran
- Ireland
- IRS
- Israel
- Italy
- Janet Yellen
- Japan
- JCT
- Jimmy Carter
- Jobs
- Joe Biden
- John Stossel
- Joint Committee on Taxation
- Joker
- Jurisdictional Competition
- Jury Nullification
- Justin Trudeau
- Kamala Harris
- Kelo
- Keynes
- Keynesian
- KPMG
- Laffer Curve
- Lakers
- Leviathan
- Libertarianism
- Liberty
- Licensing
- Liechtenstein
- Liz Truss
- Lobbying
- Local government
- Macron
- Mandate
- Margaret Thatcher
- Marginal Tax Rate
- Massachusetts
- Media Bias
- Medicaid
- Medicare
- Mexico
- Michael Bloomberg
- Michigan
- Migration
- Minimum Wage
- Minnesota
- Mitchell's Golden Rule
- Mitchell's Law
- Mitchell's Theorem
- Mobility
- Monaco
- Monetary Policy
- Money Laundering
- Moral Hazard
- nanny state
- National Education Association
- National Sales Tax
- Netherlands
- New Hampshire
- New Jersey
- New York
- New Zealand
- News Appearance
- Nixon
- North Carolina
- North Korea
- Norway
- Obama
- Ocasio-Cortez
- OECD
- Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development
- Panama
- PATRIOT Act
- Patriotism
- Patriots
- Paul Krugman
- Paul Ryan
- Paulson
- Payroll Taxation
- Pelosi
- Pets
- Philippines
- Podcast
- Poland
- Political Correctness
- Political Humor
- Politicians
- Politics
- Polling Data
- Pope Francis
- Portugal
- Postal Service
- Poverty
- Price Controls
- Privacy
- Privatization
- Productivity
- Prohibition
- Property Rights
- Property Tax
- Prostitution
- Protectionism
- Public Choice
- Public Goods
- Public Opinion
- Race
- Rahn Curve
- Rand
- Rand Paul
- Rankings
- Reagan
- Recession
- Redistribution
- Regulation
- Rent Control
- Republicans
- Roads
- Roman Polanski
- Romney
- Roosevelt
- Rule of Law
- Russia
- Sales Tax
- Savings
- School Choice
- Scotland
- Singapore
- Sleaze
- Slovakia
- Snow
- Soccer
- Social Capital
- Social Security
- Social Security Privatization
- Socialism
- Societal Capital
- Softball
- South Africa
- South Korea
- Sovereignty
- Spain
- Spending
- Spending Cap
- States
- Statism
- stimulus
- Subsidies
- Supercommittee
- Supply-side economics
- Supreme Court
- Swedem
- Sweden
- Switzerland
- TABOR
- Taiwan
- TARP
- Tax avoidance
- Tax Competition
- Tax Compliance
- Tax evasion
- Tax Harmonization
- Tax Haven
- Tax Increase
- Tax Loophole
- Tax Reform
- Taxation
- Taxpayer Ripoff
- Tea Party
- Territorial Taxation
- Terrorism
- Texas
- Thanksgiving
- Theresa May
- Third party payer
- Thomas Sowell
- Tobacco
- Tobin Tax
- Toilet Paper
- Trade
- Transportation
- TSA
- Ukraine
- Uncategorized
- Underground Economy
- Unemployment
- Union Bosses
- United Kingdom
- United Nations
- United States
- Value-Added Tax
- Vaping
- VAT
- Venezuela
- Video
- Virginia
- Vouchers
- Wages
- Wagner's Law
- Walter Williams
- Warren Harding
- Waste
- Wealth Tax
- Weekly Economics Lesson
- Welfare
- Welfare State
- World Bank
- World Health Organization
- World Trade Organization
- Worldwide Taxation
- Yankees
- Zimbabwe
- Zoning
[…] I believe in the rule of law, nobody should be subject to civil asset forfeiture (a.k.a., “policing for profit“), a reprehensible practice that allows governments to steal property without a finding of […]
[…] statement that is completely accurate: Supporters of civil asset forfeiture (also known as “policing for profit“) are neither decent nor […]
[…] Consider “civil asset forfeiture,” as described in this video. […]
[…] Indeed, the law actually gives cops an incentive to steal. That’s why it’s known as “policing for profit.” […]
[…] Indeed, the law actually gives cops an incentive to steal. That’s why it’s known as “policing for profit.” […]
[…] This is why asset forfeiture is accurately described as “policing for profit.” […]
[…] in trying to address qualified immunity, he’s also a leader in the campaign to get rid of the odious practice of asset forfeiture, which effectively creates an incentive for government to steal private […]
[…] a short video on the topic from the Institute for Justice (which, incidentally, deserves credit for the victory at the Supreme […]
[…] Nearly 400 people in Wayne County who were never charged with a crime still lost property to law enforcement agencies last year through a legal procedure called civil asset forfeiture… Altogether, there were 736 asset forfeiture proceedings in Michigan in 2017 during which someone lost property to the government despite never being charged with any crime; this happened 380 times in Wayne County. …Jarrett Skorup of the Mackinac Center for Public Policy, who co-authored a recent report on civil forfeiture, said…it’s likely that these forfeitures disproportionately affected low-income individuals, who are less able to afford an attorney or navigate the legal system to reclaim their property. Revenue obtained from forfeited property typically goes to the agency that seized the property. Yes, you read correctly. The agency that steals the property gets to keep the money, which is why the disgusting practice of civil asset forfeiture is sometimes known as “policing for profit.” […]
[…] Yes, you read correctly. The agency that steals the property gets to keep the money, which is why the disgusting practice of civil asset forfeiture is sometimes known as “policing for profit.” […]
[…] Yes, indeed, the cop was a crook in this instance. That’s because civil asset forfeiture creates a horrible incentive called “policing for profit.” […]
[…] Or “policing for profit.” […]
[…] theft is enabled by “civil asset forfeiture” and we can now add Gerardo Serrano to the list of victims. The Washington Post has the […]
[…] Even worse, government agencies are allowed to profit from this form of theft, creating a terrible incentive for abuse. […]
[…] Even worse, government agencies are allowed to profit from this form of theft, creating a terrible incentive for abuse. […]
[…] In other words, there’s a huge incentive for cops to misbehave. It’s called “policing for profit.” […]
[…] I’m not joking. This happens with distressing regularity. It’s called “policing for profit.” […]
[…] is yet another example of innocent people victimized by “policing for profit,” which notoriously happens with civil asset […]
[…] already written about the despicable practice of “civil forfeiture,” which allows governments to confiscate the property of innocent people […]
[…] Yup, this is what’s called “policing for profit.” […]
[…] Instead, today’s topic is about a more specialized version of theft by government, which technically is called civil asset forfeiture but more accurately should be referred to as policing for profit. […]
[…] War on Drugs, by contrast, has led to all sorts of policies that do infringe on our rights, from disgusting asset forfeiture policies to pointless snooping on our bank accounts. Or, as we just read, raids on okra […]
[…] War on Drugs, by contrast, has led to all sorts of policies that do infringe on our rights, from disgusting asset forfeiture policies to pointless snooping on our bank accounts. Or, as we just read, raids on okra […]
[…] War on Drugs, by contrast, has led to all sorts of policies that do infringe on our rights, from disgusting asset forfeiture policies to pointless snooping on our bank accounts. Or, as we just read, raids on okra […]
[…] The War on Drugs, for example, is the reason why politicians imposed costly and ineffective anti-money laundering laws. As well as disgusting and reprehensible asset forfeiture laws. […]
[…] Also keep in mind that the War on Drugs is the reason why politicians imposed costly and ineffective anti-money laundering laws. As well as disgusting and reprehensible asset forfeiture laws. […]
[…] Also keep in mind that the War on Drugs is the reason why politicians imposed costly and ineffective anti-money laundering laws. As well as disgusting and reprehensible asset forfeiture laws. […]
[…] rights. But the War on Drugs had led to all sorts of policies that do infringe on our rights, from disgusting asset forfeiture policies to pointless snooping on our bank […]
[…] rights. But the War on Drugs had led to all sorts of policies that do infringe on our rights, from disgusting asset forfeiture policies to pointless snooping on our bank […]
[…] I’ve shared some horror stories about “asset forfeiture,” an odious procedure that allows the government to steal private property without any finding of […]
[…] I’ve shared some horror stories about “asset forfeiture,” an odious procedure that allows the government to steal private property without any finding of […]
[…] It combines the lunacy of the drug war with the evil of asset forfeiture. […]
[…] already written about the despicable practice of “civil forfeiture,” which allows governments to confiscate the property of innocent people […]
[…] already written about the despicable practice of “civil forfeiture,” which allows governments to confiscate the property of innocent people […]
[…] already written about the despicable practice of “civil forfeiture,” which allows governments toconfiscate the property of innocent people […]
[…] already written about the despicable practice of “civil forfeiture,” which allows governments to confiscate the property of innocent people […]
[…] already written about the despicable practice of “civil forfeiture,” which allows governments to confiscate the property of innocent people […]
[…] already written about the despicable practice of “civil forfeiture,” which allows governments to confiscate the property of innocent people […]
[…] already written about the despicable practice of “civil forfeiture,” which allows governments to confiscate the property of innocent […]
[…] the Drug War is mostly a vehicle to expand the size and power of government. It’s why we have fascist asset forfeiture laws and costly money laundering […]
[…] videos about their fights against the IRS, their battles in defense of property rights, and their campaign against abusive asset forfeiture policies. Rate this:Share this:PrintEmailFacebookTwitterMoredeliciousDiggFarkLinkedInRedditStumbleUponLike […]
[…] already posted a great video from the Institute for Justice about this topic, and I also suggest you read this horror story and this nauseating episode to see […]
[…] already posted a great video from the Institute for Justice about this topic, and I also suggest you read this horror story and this nauseating episode to see […]
[…] is a great organization that effectively fights for individual rights. Check out this IJ video on asset forfeiture laws (which basically enable stealing by the […]
[…] why I’ve criticized abuses of police power, in cases such as asset forfeiture, the destructive war on drugs, videotaping of public officials, and persecution of victimless […]
[…] I’ve already written about this issue (including an example from my county) and highlighted how asset forfeiture gives government bureaucracies a perverse incentive to steal. […]
[…] I’ve already written about this issue (including an example from my county) and highlighted how asset forfeiture gives government bureaucracies a perverse incentive to steal. […]
[…] be deadly since cops killed an optometrist during a SWAT arrest. The Institute for Justice has a powerful video on the dangers of “policing for profit,” and Fairfax County is just one bad example of how this […]
[…] 25, 2010 by Dan Mitchell I´ve already posted a great video from the folks at the Institute for Justice about this issue, but this John Stossel column is another […]
[…] 21, 2010 by Dan Mitchell I´ve already posted a great video from the folks at the Institute for Justice about this issue, but this John Stossel column is another […]