One of my very first blog posts was about the link between big government and big corruption.
For the rest of my life, I can now cite the Obamacare travesty as an example.
Here’s some of what Tim Carney wrote for the Washington Examiner.
Chief Justice John Roberts’ judicial sleight of hand, transforming Obamacare’s mandate into a tax, was a fittingly twisted save for a law of such grisly provenance. Born of tawdry liaisons between industry lobbyists and political hacks, passed through naked logrolling and legislative skullduggery, Obamacare wasn’t finalized until Thursday, when the chief justice, in effect, amended the bill so that it would become constitutional.
Tim recounts some of the sleaze and corruption that allowed Obamacare to move through Congress.
…within weeks of his inauguration, Obama started playing the game. An early Obamacare confab was held at the headquarters of the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee — showing how this was a political exercise as much as a policy one. At this April 2009 meeting, top lobbyists from the drug industry and White House Deputy Chief of Staff Jim Messina hammered out a deal — exposed by recently released emails — whereby the drug industry would pay for pro-Obamacare ads basically written by the White House. Big Pharma would also spend big to re-elect Democrats who voted for the bill. …The Senate bill was authored mostly by Finance Committee Chairman Max Baucus and Majority Leader Harry Reid, probably the two senators most notoriously cozy with lobbyists. To win over wavering Democrats, Reid loaded the bill up with special favors. Nebraska’s Ben Nelson got the “Cornhusker Kickback,” and Reid bought Mary Landrieu’s vote with the “Louisiana Purchase” — both deals giving those states extra Medicaid money. … Democratic staffers who wrote the bill cashed out to K Street nearly immediately, becoming health industry lobbyists. Democratic Reps. Bart Stupak and Earl Pomeroy, who both lost their seats (Stupak retired, Pomeroy was defeated) thanks to their votes for Obamacare, were also rewarded with lobbying gigs for health care companies.
The combination of a politically motivated Chief Justice and a tawdry legislative process led Tim to this conclusion.
If this is how a bill becomes a law, our kids are going to need new civics textbooks.
Since this is a very depressing topic, we need to add some levity. I already did a post with several good Obamacare cartoons, but I can’t resist adding this one.
Returning to our unpleasant topic, Richard Epstein opined last Friday in the New York Times about the Obamacare decision and explained (as I noted last week as well) that the power to tax does not create a power to spend.
By giving Congress independent powers over taxation and other revenue sources, the Constitution ended that dependency. But as a quid pro quo, the Constitution also restricted the use of these revenues to classical public goods — benefits that must be given to all citizens, if given to any — like paying off national debts and paying for the nation’s defense. General welfare, mentioned in parallel with these two phrases, is best read as covering only matters that advance the welfare of the United States as a whole. The redistribution of income, or “transfer payments” among citizens, like those mandated under the Affordable Care Act, doesn’t qualify for taxation in this originalist reading of the Constitution. Through the early 20th century, the Supreme Court was cognizant of this tight relationship between the power to regulate an activity directly and to the power to tax it. The basic idea relies on a simple economic insight: taxation and regulation are close substitutes, so a limitation on one power matters little if the other power is still available. There is no practical difference between ordering an action, and taxing or fining people who don’t do that same thing. If the Constitution limits direct federal powers, it must also limit Congress’s indirect power of taxation.
Unfortunately, Supreme Court Justices sometimes don’t care what the Constitution says.
P.S. This is the second time the Obamacare Frankenstein monster has appeared on this blog. He was with his twin brother last time.
P.P.S. This is a post about the unseemly genesis of Obamacare, but I’m a fiscal policy wonk, so I want to remind everyone that this new entitlement will be a budget buster.
[…] I don’t like Obamacare because it generated an embarrassingly bad decision by the Supreme Court. […]
[…] I don’t like Obamacare because it generated an embarrassingly bad decision by the Supreme Court. […]
[…] to rule whether Obamacare was an impermissible expansion of the power of the federal government. In a truly odious decision, Chief Justice John Roberts ignored the Constitution’s limits on federal powers and decided […]
[…] Supreme Court’s first Obamacare decision back in 2012 then took that negligence to a higher […]
[…] Supreme Court’s first Obamacare decision back in 2012 then took that negligence to a higher […]
[…] the Court rules correctly (unlike, ahem, the last time the Justices dealt with Obamacare), it will then be very important that congressional reformers use […]
[…] but it’s also possible that the Supreme Court will (for a change of pace) make the right ruling on a key Obamacare case later this year. And this would probably force […]
[…] but it’s also possible that the Supreme Court will (for a change of pace) make the right ruling on a key Obamacare case later this year. And this would probably force […]
[…] given what happened back in 2012, when Chief Justice Roberts put politics above the Constitution, it’s anybody’s guess what will happen with King v […]
[…] motivated decision to approve Obamacare, I shared a bunch of depressing (but funny) cartoons, including a few focusing on added power for the […]
[…] if I was a partisan Republican, I would get down on my knees every day to give thanks because Chief Justice John Roberts was willing to disregard the Constitution to keep Obamacare […]
[…] if I was a partisan Republican, I would get down on my knees every day to give thanks because Chief Justice John Roberts was willing to disregard the Constitution to keep Obamacare […]
[…] had some very good (or should I say bad?) options for that award, including the Supreme Court’s Obamacare decision, the IRS’s lawless decision to make American banks act as tax collectors for foreign […]
[…] Was it the craven decision by John Roberts to put politics before the Constitution and cast the deciding vote for Obamacare? This certainly could be the most disappointing event of the year, but technically it didn’t […]
[…] Barone has exposed the sleaziness of the waiver process, Tim Carney revealed the special deals for politically connected companies, and I suggested the process was eerily similar to a passage […]
[…] Barone has exposed the sleaziness of the waiver process, Tim Carney revealed the special deals for politically connected companies, and I suggested the process was eerily similar to a passage […]
[…] Barone has exposed the sleaziness of the waiver process, Tim Carney revealed the special deals for politically connected companies, and I suggested the process was eerily similar to a passage […]
[…] not trying to defend the White House. Obamacare is an example of a law that was only made possible because of bribery, and now the Administration is in the process of arbitrarily and illegally rewriting its own […]
[…] Frankenstein periodically appears in political cartoons, including this Glenn Foden IRS cartoon and these Henry Payne cartoons about Romneycare and Obamacare. […]
[…] politically motivated decision to approve Obamacare, I shared a bunch of depressing (but funny) cartoons, including a few focusing on added power for the […]
[…] politically motivated decision to approve Obamacare, I shared a bunch of depressing (but funny) cartoons, including a few focusing on added power for the […]
[…] posted five good Obamacare cartoons last week (and included two others in this post and this post), and was planning on stopping […]
[…] Was it the craven decision by John Roberts to put politics before the Constitution and cast the deciding vote for Obamacare? This certainly could be the most disappointing event of the year, but technically it didn’t […]
[…] Was it the craven decision by John Roberts to put politics before the Constitution and cast the deciding vote for Obamacare? This certainly could be the most disappointing event of the year, but technically it didn’t […]
Reblogged this on Talon's Point.
It’s always good to remember, legislation does not necessarily equal law.
Also remember, the townspeople took matters into their own hands when Frankenstein’s monster got loose. I’m interested to see what the ‘compassionate’ folks who do not want poor people to be denied health care will do when the government tries to collect $2k from them for not buying health insurance. It doesn’t seem like they’ve connected these dots yet. I imagine when this happens the legislation will lose its teeth. Perhaps charity will suddenly look like a better option to them.
Finally, the only thing I don’t like about the cartoon is that F’s monster wasn’t such a bad dude, just a little clumsy. If I were to redo the cartoon, perhaps dripping water on the gremlins would be a better picture.
[…] posted five good Obamacare cartoons last week (and included two others in this post and this post), and was planning on stopping […]
I’m sure this is another well thought out post, but I don’t want to think about it right now. I do want to say this headline is this years best, so far.
It will be a “growth buster” and thaLlosa all that matters for mid and long term prosperity. Growth buster because even though Americans have not quite descended to French incentives to produce, the point of no return has passed on America’s trajectory to decline. Now, as the growth we have complacently been accustomed to becomes unattainable we will feel the economic distress. Predictably we will head to the polls for some relief in the form of more government “care” packages. The point of no return has passed. Enjoy a few years of decline while reality and the awakening three billion people of the emerging world sort things out.
All that really matters is what happens in November!!!