Walter Williams explains why politicians and bureaucrats shouldn’t have the power to tell us what we’re allowed to buy.
At first blush, the mercantilists’ call for “free trade but fair trade” sounds reasonable. After all, who can be against fairness? Giving the idea just a bit of thought suggests that fairness as a guide for public policy lays the groundwork for tyranny. …Last summer, I purchased a 2010 LS 460 Lexus, through a U.S. intermediary, from a Japanese producer for $70,000. Here’s my question to you: Was that a fair or unfair trade? I was free to keep my $70,000 or purchase the car. The Japanese producer was free to keep his Lexus or sell me the car. …The exchange occurred because I saw myself as being better off and so did the Japanese producer. I think it was both free and fair trade, and I’d like an American mercantilist to explain to me how it wasn’t. Mercantilists have absolutely no argument when we recognize that trade is mostly between individuals. Mercantilists pretend that trade occurs between nations such as U.S. trading with England or Japan to appeal to our jingoism. …That’s nonsense. Trade occurs between individuals in one country, through intermediaries, with individuals in another country. Who might protest that my trade with the Lexus manufacturer was unfair? If you said an American car manufacturer and their union workers, go to the head of the class. …it’s never American consumers who complain about cheaper prices. It’s always American producers and their unions who do the complaining. That ought to tell us something.
The only thing I would add is that protectionists and free traders should unite in a campaign to get rid of misguided government policies that make it more difficult for American companies to create jobs and produce goods in America. America’s punitive corporate tax rate, for instance, should be dramatically lowered.
[…] one of the original goals – free trade between European nations – was admirable and has generated significant […]
[…] “extremely regrettable” is the understatement of the century. As Walter Williams observed, protectionism is a punitive form of government intervention. Politicians and bureaucrats decide […]
[…] I also encourage people to read Walter Williams on this […]
[…] one of the original goals – free trade between European nations – was admirable and has generated significant […]
[…] one of the original goals – free trade between European nations – was admirable and has generated significant […]
[…] one of the original goals – free trade between European nations – was admirable and has generated significant […]
[…] By the way, if you have protectionist friends, ask them if they have good answer for these eight questions. And also direct them to the wise words of Walter Williams. […]
[…] Walter Williams has explained, this is a simple matter of freedom and liberty. If you want to give the political elite the […]
[…] Walter Williams has explained, this is a simple matter of freedom and liberty. If you want to give the political elite the […]
[…] argument doesn’t make sense is that it presumes a contest among nations. Yet as Walter Williams wisely explained, trade ultimately is between private […]
[…] links: An Open Letter to A Correspondent Free-Trade is ultimately a moral issue The Only Fair Trade Is Free Trade Donald J. Boudreaux’s Economics in Many Lessons: Ask the […]
[…] Walter Williams has explained, this is a simple matter of freedom and liberty. If you want to give the political elite the […]
[…] Walter Williams has explained, this is a simple matter of freedom and liberty. If you want to give the political elite the […]
[…] As Walter Williams has explained, this is a simple matter of freedom and liberty. If you want to give the political elite the authority to tell you whether you can buy foreign-produced goods, you have opened the door to endless mischief. […]
[…] Walter Williams has explained, this is a simple matter of freedom and liberty. If you want to give the political elite the […]
And it might help if the federal government stopped exporting jobs by fiat, by not allowing domestic oil production, by sending the manufacture of light bulbs to Chinese slaves, etc. The first one, the refusal to allow domestic production of oil off shore, in ANWR, etc., is the most egregious exporting of jobs in the country, but nobody ever complains about how Congress exports jobs.