One of the obvious dangers of government-run health care is that politicians and bureaucrats will get to decide what health care you should receive. In many nations, this means people die because they no longer have access to medical treatment. But Oregon’s government system goes one step further and actually offers to pay for suicide. Foxnews.com reports:
Archive for the ‘Spending’ Category
National Health Care and Government-Subsidized Suicide
Posted in Health Care, Spending, Uncategorized, tagged Government Spending, Health Care on July 1, 2009| 3 Comments »
Mr. Obama, Tear Down this Building!
Posted in Competitiveness, Economics, Fiscal Policy, News Appearance, Spending, tagged Competitiveness, Economics, Education, Fiscal Policy, Government Spending, News Appearance on June 26, 2009| 43 Comments »
I call for the elimination of the Department of the education in this debate on CNBC (and remark that the building should be torn down and a foot of salt put on the ground so nothing can ever spring forth again).
Tax Oppression Index Ranks America in Bottom Half of Industrialized Nations
Posted in Competitiveness, Economics, Fiscal Policy, Spending, Taxation, Uncategorized, tagged Competitiveness, Economics, Fiscal Policy, Free Markets, Taxation on June 25, 2009| 23 Comments »
A thorough new study of 30 nations from the Institut Constant de Rebecque in Switzerland reveals serious shortcomings in America’s tax system. The report, entitled “Tax burden and individual rights in the OECD: an international comparison,” creates a Tax Oppression Index based on three key variables: the overall tax burden, public governance, and taxpayer rights. The good news is that the United States has a comparatively low aggregate tax burden, though America’s score on this measure would be much better in the absence of a punitively high corporate tax rate. The bad news is that corruption and inefficiency in Washington drag down America’s score for public governance. The ugly news is that America has a very low rating for protecting taxpayer rights – largely because politicians have tilted the playing field to favor the IRS, including the fact that taxpayers lose the presumption of innocence provided in the Constitution. Here is a brief description of the study:
The OECD’s campaign against “harmful tax competition” and “tax havens” has overshadowed the essential issue, namely the important roles that both tax competition and “tax havens” play for capital preservation and formation, leading to higher prosperity and better protection of individual rights throughout the OECD. The tax oppression index is based on 18 representative criteria measuring fiscal attractiveness, public governance and financial privacy in the 30 member states of the OECD. Switzerland appears as the country with the lowest tax oppression – due to a relatively low tax burden and a more [classical] liberal institutional order, including its citizens’ right to veto legislation, political decentralization, and protection of financial privacy. Germany and France, on the other hand, whose governments have supported the OECD’s efforts, are among the most questionable states in terms of safeguarding their residents’ individual rights. …The tax oppression index evaluates the 30 OECD member states on three complementary dimensions quantified by 18 representative criteria, on the basis of OECD and World Bank data. The index enables relevant conclusions about the tax burden and individual rights among those countries.
Switzerland earns the top ranking in the report, followed by Luxembourg, Austria, Canada, and Slovakia. Italy and Turkey have the worst systems, follwed by Poland, Mexico, and Germany. The United States is tied for 19th, behind even the welfare states of Scandinavia. With Obama promising the raise tax rates and increase the power of the IRS, it may just be a matter of time before the U.S. is competing for the world’s most oppressive tax regime.
February 2017 Addendum: Here’s the relevant table from the study.
Taxpayers Get Screwed
Posted in Economics, Fiscal Policy, Spending, Uncategorized, Waste, tagged Economics, Fiscal Policy, Government Spending, Waste on June 23, 2009| 6 Comments »
Since politicians get to spend other people’s money, and use that process to raise campaign cash and buy votes, there is no limit to the stupid things they are willing to fund. The new study on condom use is merely the latest example. Foxnew.com has the details:
The federal government is spending $423,500 to find out why men don’t like to wear condoms, a project government watchdogs say is a nearly-half-a-million-dollar waste of taxpayer money. Researchers at Indiana University’s Kinsey Institute, with funding from the National Institutes of Health, are investigating why “young, heterosexual adult men” have problems using condoms. The study will include “skill-based intervention” to teach grown men how to use protection. …it has government watchdogs rolling their eyes at what they say is a clear waste of taxpayer money. “This government is so out of whack with what the priorities are that this actually makes sense that we’d be wasting money on a condom study rather than the real problems facing the country,” said David Williams, vice president for policy at Citizens Against Government Waste, which tracks wasteful spending in the federal budget. For American men — many of whom have already undergone years of awkward sex ed in the care of gym teachers — the study might not offer much of a boost, Williams said.