The recipe for growth and prosperity isn’t very complicated.
Adam Smith provided a very simple formula back in the 1700s.
For folks who prefer a more quantitative approach, the Fraser Institute’s Economic Freedom of the World uses dozens of variables to rank nations based on key indices such as rule of law, size of government, regulatory burden, trade openness, and stable money.
One of the heartening lessons from this research is that countries don’t need perfect policy. So long as there is simply “breathing room” for the private sector, growth is possible. Just look at China, for instance, where hundreds of millions of people have been lifted from destitution thanks to a modest bit of economic liberalization.
Indeed, it’s remarkable how good policy (if sustained over several decades) can generate very positive results.
That’s a main message in this new video from the Center for Freedom and Prosperity.
The first part of the video, narrated by Abir Doumit, reviews success stories from around the world, including Hong Kong, Singapore, Chile, Estonia, Taiwan, Ireland, South Korea, and Botswana.
Pay particular attention to the charts showing how per-capita economic output has grown over time in these jurisdictions compared to other nations. That’s the real test of what works.
The second part of the video exposes the scandalous actions of international bureaucracies, which are urging higher fiscal burdens in developing nations even though no poor nation has ever become a rich nation with bigger government. Never.
Yet bureaucracies such as the United Nations, the International Monetary Fund, and the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development are explicitly pushing for higher taxes in poor nations based on the anti-empirical notion that bigger government is a strategy for growth.
I’m not joking.
As Ms. Doumit remarks in the video, these bureaucracies never offer a shred of evidence for this bizarre hypothesis.
And what’s especially frustrating is that the big nations of the western world (i.e., the ones that control the international bureaucracies) all became rich when government was very small.
And while the bureaucracies never provide any data or evidence, the Center for Freedom and Prosperity’s video is chock full of substantive information. Consider, for instance, this chart showing that there was almost no redistribution spending in the western world as late as 1930.
Unfortunately, the burden of government spending in western nations has metastasized starting in the 1930s. Total outlays now consume enormous amounts of economic output and counterproductive redistribution spending is now the biggest part of national budgets.
But at least western nations became rich first and then made the mistake of adopting bad fiscal policy (fortunately offset by improvements in other areas such as trade liberalization).
The international bureaucracies are trying to convince poor nations, which already suffer from bad policy, that they can succeed by imposing additional bad fiscal policy and then magically hope that growth will materialize.
And having just spent last week observing two conferences on tax and development at the United Nations in New York City, I can assure you that this is what they really think.
[…] Needless to say, that’s bunk. […]
[…] policy, but the research gave me an opportunity to condemn the OECD, IMF, and UN for peddling the nonsensical argument that more government spending would promote faster growth in poor […]
[…] results are not applicable to rich countries, the conclusions are very useful since they debunk the absurd notion (peddled by the IMF, OECD, and UN) that developing nations should have bigger […]
[…] results are not applicable to rich countries, the conclusions are very useful since they debunk the absurd notion (peddled by the IMF, OECD, and UN) that developing nations should have bigger […]
[…] remember that fiscal policy is just one piece of the puzzle, so I also recommend this video and this video if you want a full understanding of the policies that are needed to create broadly […]
[…] And weak rule of law is an even bigger challenge in the developing world than bad advice from international […]
[…] for growth. And weak rule of law is an even bigger challenge in the developing world than bad advice from international […]
[…] At the risk of understatement, that’s nonsense. […]
[…] But the understanding of economic policy at the UN is utterly abysmal. Until and unless that statist mindset is eliminated, giving more money to the bureaucracy would be rewarding the pursuit of bad policy. […]
[…] that government should be bigger, in some cases much bigger, with international bureaucracies often advocatingthis […]
[…] that government should be bigger, in some cases much bigger, with international bureaucracies often advocating this […]
[…] This video show why groups such as the IMF and OECD are wildly wrong. […]
[…] The moral of the story is that there’s a very simple recipe showing how poor nations can become rich nations. […]
[…] is the message of a 2017 video from the Center for Freedom and Prosperity. And it’s also the reason I repeatedly ask the […]
[…] is the message of a 2017 video from the Center for Freedom and Prosperity. And it’s also the reason I repeatedly ask the […]
[…] a fiscal crisis, fiscal policy isn’t even Lebanon’s biggest problem. As noted in this video, the country does even worse on trade policy, regulatory policy, and rule of […]
[…] be fair, he’s not the only one to make this argument. Bureaucracies such as the International Monetary Fund, the United Nations, and […]
[…] be fair, he’s not the only one to make this argument. Bureaucracies such as the International Monetary Fund, the United Nations, and the Organization for Economic […]
[…] a video that addresses this […]
[…] of these proposals are based on the flawed theory that bigger government can promote development. And all of the proposals also are hypocritical […]
[…] poor countries won’t become rich countries if they don’t follow the recipe for growth and prosperity. At the risk of understatement, […]
[…] economics, specifically convergence theory, tells us that poor nations should grow faster than rich […]
[…] in 2017, the Center for Freedom and Prosperity released this video, which shows that free markets and small government are the best recipe for poor nations that want […]
[…] international bureaucracies commonly argue that these countries should increase their tax burdens to provide “financing for […]
[…] international organizations are infamous nowadays for the bizarre argumentthat developing nations should try to boost prosperity by imposing higher taxes and bigger […]
[…] international organizations are infamous nowadays for the bizarre argument that developing nations should try to boost prosperity by imposing higher taxes and bigger […]
[…] a wealth of evidence that markets are the best way of helping the poor. But the Pope wants more […]
[…] While they’re definitely not libertarian, international bureaucracies are big advocates of boosting state capacity. They argue that bigger government will somehow kick-start grow in […]
[…] are good for prosperity. And it’s not just the OECD pushing this bizarre theory. It’s now routine for international bureaucracies to push this upside-down analysis, based on the anti-empirical […]
[…] Additionally, it was good to have multilateral institutions such as the International Monetary Fund and World Bank using their leverage to push for pro-market reforms (unlike today, when international bureaucracies often push a statist agenda). […]
[…] the International Monetary Fund and Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development have been pushing this idea in recent years. They use phrases such as “resource mobilization” and “financing […]
[…] (and other bureaucracies) assert that higher taxes are good for growth, I explain that it’s all based on fairy dust or magic […]
[…] This video tells you everything you need to know. […]
[…] U.N. have a sincere desire to help the world’s less-fortunate people. But they need to put facts and empirical data above statist […]
[…] only hard-left politicians and international bureaucracies have the gall to claim that you can strengthen an economy by having governments collect more […]
[…] was honest and admitted that this would mean less prosperity. Too bad international bureaucracies such as the OECD and IMF don’t share Okun’s […]
[…] he seems to share the naive (and presumably self-interested) arguments of international bureaucrats about the potential efficacy of […]
[…] guess they all think if they repeat nonsense often enough, people will somehow conclude up is down and black is […]
[…] This video from the Center for Freedom and Prosperity examines whether big government is the right way to boost prosperity in poor nations. […]
[…] the risk of stating the obvious, the problem in developing nations is bad government policy, not insufficient revenue in the hands […]
[…] Lebanon has one the best floors for fiscal policy, but the foundation is quicksand and the regulatory floor is a wreck. So that may not be an ideal place to live (notwithstanding […]
[…] economics is that there should be “convergence” between rich countries and poor countries, which is just another way of saying that low-income nations – all other things being equal […]
[…] for Economic Cooperation and Development are now pushing a statist agenda based on the bizarre theory that higher taxes and more spending somehow produce […]
[…] for Economic Cooperation and Development are now pushing a statist agenda based on the bizarre theory that higher taxes and more spending somehow produce […]
[…] Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development are now pushing a statist agenda based on the bizarre theory that higher taxes and more spending somehow produce […]
[…] In any event, he’s definitely wrong on how to generate more prosperity. Maybe he should watch this video. […]
[…] In any event, he’s definitely wrong on how to generate more prosperity. Maybe he should watch this video. […]
[…] recomiendo este video del Center for Freedom and Prosperity, ya que contesta muy bien al argumento de que impuestos más […]
[…] also recommend this video from the Center for Freedom and Prosperity since it does a great job of debunking the argument that […]
[…] So they try to claim – notwithstanding reams of evidence – that bigger government somehow enables more growth. […]
[…] So they try to claim – notwithstanding reams of evidence – that bigger government somehow enables more growth. […]
[…] in genuinely sensible information on how poor nations can become rich nations, I strongly recommend this video from the Center for Freedom and […]
[…] this doesn’t mean I’m reflexively against international organizations. My criticisms of the IMF, OECD, UN, and WB are solely a function of their work to empower governments at the […]
[…] a related note, Professor Alexander Salter dismisses the assertion (pushed by international bureaucracies) that big government is a pre-condition for prosperity. Here’s some of what he […]
[…] issues were addressed in a recent video from the Center for Freedom and […]
[…] on fiscal policy, but get a bad overall score because of poor performance in non-fiscal variables (Lebanon, for instance). Similarly, there are nations that get rotten scores on fiscal policy, yet are […]
[…] on fiscal policy, but get a bad overall score because of poor performance in non-fiscal variables (Lebanon, for instance). Similarly, there are nations that get rotten scores on fiscal policy, yet are […]
[…] close with some libertarian humor, courtesy of a future Top-100 libertarian who also is in Vegas for […]
[…] in April, I shared a new video from the Center for Freedom and Prosperity that explained how poor nations can become rich nations […]
[…] in April, I shared a new video from the Center for Freedom and Prosperity that explained how poor nations can become rich nations […]
[…] Ce n’est pas une blague. Ça ne repose jamais sur des arguments factuels, bien sûr, mais il n’est pas rare de trouver désormais des bureaucrates internationaux affirmant qu’il y aura davantage de prospérité si davantage de ressources sont extraites du secteur privé pour être confiées aux politiciens (cf. la vidéo à 3:30). […]
[…] more resources are taken out of the private sector and given to politicians (see the 3:30 mark of this video for some […]
[…] bottom line is that people who care about the world’s poor people should be advocating for freedom rather than […]
[…] bottom line is that people who care about the world’s poor people should be advocating for freedom rather than […]
[…] here’s a must-watch video on the relationship between good policy and better economics […]
[…] here’s a must-watch video on the relationship between good policy and better economics […]
[…] here’s a must-watch video on the relationship between good policy and better economics […]
Reblogged this on Doug's Blog and commented:
This comes under the category of “duh!” The evidence is overwhelming, according to this post.
[…] The bottom line is that statism is a recipe for stagnation and free markets are a route to prosperity. […]
[…] The Recipe for Growth & Prosperity Isn’t Obscure (wordpress) […]
[…] there is more on bad advice from international […]
Is the increase in government spending anything to do with government takeover of the educational system? Nowadays their focus seems to be to teach what to think rather than how to think…
Correction: …this is what they really “believe”. Thinking has nothing to do with their programs.