Even though I’m personally a prude on the issue of drugs, that doesn’t stop me from opposing the Drug War, both for moral and practical reasons.
After all, how can any sensible and decent person want laws that produce these outrageous results?
The DEA trying to confiscate a commercial building because a tenant sold some marijuana.
The government seeking to steal a hotel because some guests sold some marijuana.
Cops raiding an organic nursery and seizing blackberry bushes.
The feds grabbing cash from innocent bystanders in legal cases.
The government arresting a grandmother for buying cold medicine.
Cops entrapping an autistic teen to boost their arrest numbers.
And don’t forget the misguided War on Drugs is also why we have costly, intrusive, and ineffective anti-money laundering laws, which result in other outrages, such as the government arbitrarily stealing money from small business owners.
Though not every enforcement action leads to grotesque abuse of human rights. Sometimes the Drug War merely exposes the stupidity of government.
Let’s add another horror story to our list.
Jacob Sullum of Reason has a very disturbing example of how the Drug War leads to very bad outcomes.
Why did a SWAT team raid Bob and Addie Harte’s house in Leawood, Kansas, two years ago, then force the couple and their two children to sit on a couch for two hours while officers rifled their belongings, searching for “narcotics” that were not there?
Sullum conveniently provides the answer, though it’s not one that should satisfy any normal person.
…the Hartes made two mistakes: Bob went to a hydroponics store in Kansas City, Missouri, with his son to buy supplies for a school science project, and Addie drank tea. It cost them $25,000 to discover that these innocent actions earned them an early-morning visit by screaming, rifle-waving men with a battering ram.
Here are the odious details of local government run amok.
…the Hartes hired a lawyer to help them obtain the relevant records… Eventually the Hartes learned that a Missouri Highway Patrol trooper saw Bob at the hydroponics store on August 9, 2011. Seven months later, state police passed on this hot tip to the sheriff’s office, which sprang into action (after a few weeks), rummaging through the Hartes’ garbage three times in April 2012. On all three occasions, they found “wet plant material” that a field test supposedly identified as marijuana.
Does that sound like probable cause for an assault on their home?
…the cops did not bother to confirm their field results with a more reliable lab test before charging into the Hartes’ home, three days after their third surreptitious trash inspection. When the Hartes starting asking questions about the raid, the sheriff’s office suddenly decided to test that wet plant material, which it turned out was not marijuana after all. The Hartes figure it must have been the loose tea that Addie favors, which she tends to toss into the trash after brewing.
So what’s the bottom line? The Hartes want to make it easier to obtain records.
…the Hartes think Kansas cops would be more careful if obtaining police records were easier. “You shouldn’t have to have $25,000, even $5,000,” Addie Harte tells KSHB. “You shouldn’t have to have that kind of money to find out why people came raiding your house like some sort of police state.”
I obviously agree, but an even more important lesson is that we should re-think America’s foolish Drug War.
I happen to think drugs are bad and that people shouldn’t use them. Heck, I also think people shouldn’t overeat, that gambling is dumb, and that alcohol abuse is terrible.
But I know that government prohibition won’t solve these problems and almost surely will make matters worse.
Besides, I don’t like being on the same side of an issue as certain people.
I’d rather side with folks such as John Stossel, Gary Johnson, John McCain, Mona Charen, Pat Robertson, Cory Booker, Rick Perry, and Richard Branson.
[…] Doing drugs can be risky, but that’s not an argument for the War on Drugs. […]
[…] here’s another takeaway from the election results: The American people have rejected the foolish and expensive War on […]
[…] already admitted, for instance, that I don’t like drugs, gambling, and prostitution. But that doesn’t mean that I want to use government coercion to […]
If drugs were legal, their use might persist. Or their use may go down overtime. What is ridiculous is how hypocritical our existing drug policy is. We get punished for using them, however, some of our leaders who used them get a free pass. These people are committing crimes against themselves, not the government.
[…] War on Drugs also is the reason that non-drug users are grossly mistreated and even […]
Prohibition of drugs and their use is absurd. I think they should all be legal. Another detail that perplexes me is how our leaders admit to using these drugs and hypocritically want to enact policies to deny us the freedom to use them or not.
[…] I’m not a fan of the War on Drugs, even though I’m personally very socially conservative on the use of drugs. Regardless of my individual preferences, I recognize that prohibition gives government the power to trample our rights, that it is borderline (if not over-the-line) racist, and that it leads to horrible injustices. […]
[…] I’m not a fan of the War on Drugs, even though I’m personally very socially conservative on the use of drugs. Regardless of my individual preferences, I recognize that prohibition gives government the power to trample our rights, that it is borderline (if not over-the-line) racist, and that it leads to horrible injustices. […]
The drug war is futile to wage. It is a waste of taxpayers’ money and not going to solve the underlying problem of drug addiction.
I would be hard pressed to think of one thing the government does well, any level of government. There is such over-reach and so many people are so blind to the consequences of that misuse of power and consequences of the over regulation until they are slammed personally. The military had been functional until Obama, but I don’t believe the country is defended any longer.
The War on Drugs has shown that the cartels are effectively paying off people in important positions. It is great for lawyers and has continued the sales of drugs and unknown substances in almost every middle and high school in the USA. It seems people would be sick of their children being poisoned at school, but it hasn’t happened in the last 40 years. And, this does not begin to address the corruption from the wealth that comes from the illicit drug trade.
[…] tempted to point out at this point the foolishness of the Drug War, but that’s the point I want to make today. Heck, we can assume he had $18,000 because he […]
To Clarence Swinney,
(1) Read article about government power run amok.
(2) List broad statistics, some true.
(3) Omit that many of the stats arise from government regulation and cronyism.
(4) Tax everyone you can without losing votes.
(5) Give the money to government to increase its power.
(6) A better world.
WHAT IS THIS?
10 banks hold 80%0f deposits
2 firms distribute 90% of beer
Banks hold more equity in homes than occupants
10 firms hold 90% of health insurance policies
A youngster goes to prison for holding five grams of pot but not for holding a six pack of intoxicating beer
The majority of prisoners are there for non-violent crimes
58M get Social Securityâ8.1M are on SS disability
400 have more wealth than 90%
What can the public do?
Increase Minimum Wage to $10.10â50% tax on income over 1m and 70% om top one tenth of one percentâEstate Tax âRepeal Bush Tax CutâRepeal Obama Payroll Tax-Tariff tax on products made by overseas American plants
Clarence Swinney calls it horrible