I’m almost too depressed to write anything today. The Georgia Bulldogs came within five yards on the final play of the game of winning college football’s national championship (the game against Notre Dame being a mere formality for the winner of the Southeastern Conference), but fell 32-28 to the Alabama Crimson Tide.
But if the Continental Army could survive a bitter winter at Valley Forge, then surely I can summon the intestinal fortitude to write a blog post while sitting in a warm hotel room (yes, perhaps I’m being a tad bit melodramatic).
So here comes the second edition of “Question of the Week.” Last weekend, I responded to a query about whether I hated Republicans.
The most interesting question this week comes from a German reader, who asks “Are there any issues where you have changed your mind since coming to Washington?”
I’m tempted to say no. I came to Washington guided by libertarian principles and I’m still motivated by a desire to increase human liberty.
But I’m not the same person I was 20 years ago. Here are three areas where my views have evolved (though I hate using that word since it usually is used to describe the views of certain Republicans who have been in town too long and have decided big government is fine and dandy).
1. I’m much more uncomfortable about the death penalty. As I explained in my post about the shooting of Congresswoman Giffords, I’ve become more distrustful about the integrity of prosecutors. I think some of these politically ambitious jackals would deliberately send an innocent man to his death if it advanced their political careers. That being said, I’m a big believer that cost-benefit analysis is appropriate for criminal justice, so the deterrent value of the death penalty presumably saves some lives. In any event, I’m torn on this issue, though it doesn’t stop me from mocking groups that claim America is a horrible country because we still have capital punishment. And I also confessed this fantasy involving the death penalty.

“The fiscal collapse will happen after I leave office, so why worry?”
2. I now think Washington is pervasively corrupt. When I first came to town, I figured there was a lot of sleaze and graft facilitated by big government. Nothing has changed about that assessment, but I now think that a bigger problem is moral and cultural corruption among the political elite. Washington is filled with people who know the system is a racket. They know that the country is on a very dangerous trajectory. Many of them even understand what needs to be done to fix the problems. But they often decide that their short-run personal and political interests are more important than the long-run interests of the nation. But it’s also important to realize that politicians almost always are a combination of good and evil. The same folks who routinely cast bad votes every so often can be persuaded to do the right thing for the right reason, as occurred when GOPers in the House voted for the Ryan budget and its desperately needed entitlement reforms.
3. I’ve learned to be more careful about being myopically fixated on fiscal policy. As I noted in this post about tax rates, there are many factors that determine a nation’s economic performance. That’s hardly a breathtaking revelation, but in the past I have sometimes neglected to incorporate that understanding in my analysis. I’ve written positively about Ireland’s corporate tax regime, for instance, but failed to include important caveats about other government policies that were a threat to prosperity. This is a disservice to readers, and it also makes it easier for critics to put forth arguments such as “you said Ireland’s low corporate tax rate was a key to growth and look what happened.” To be sure, most of those folks would make those accusation even if I produced comprehensive analysis of Ireland’s good and bad policies. But I now try to be more careful so I don’t have to engage in after-the-fact elaborations.
I’m sure there are probably other ways in which my attitudes have changed over the years, but these are the things that come to mind.
Now, if you’ll excuse me, I’m going to find a dark room and curl up in the fetal position.
[…] be very few laws, and they would be designed to protect life, liberty, and property. And cops and prosecutors would all be fair and […]
[…] This set of principles explains my views on a wide range of issues, such as the War on Drugs, asset forfeiture, money laundering, search and seizure, and the death penalty. […]
[…] P.P.S. In my younger days, I assumed that cops and prosecutors were the good guys, helping to maintain an orderly society. I still think that most of them want to do what’s right, but I also now realize that our Founding Fathers were very wise to include strong protections for defendants in our Constitution. Simply stated, some cops and some prosecutors are bad and those bad apples are why I favor strengthening the Fourth Amendment and have become more skeptical of the death penalty. […]
[…] A very effective zinger, I’ll be the first to admit. Indeed, the cartoonist hits me in asomewhat sensitive spot. […]
[…] I’m now much more skeptical about the death penalty for many of the reasons Glenn discusses in his column. To be blunt, I don’t trust that […]
[…] I wouldn’t normally hold someone from ‘Bama in high esteem – especially since I haven’t stopped sulking since the SEC Championship Game. but when someone does something that merits high praise, I’m […]
[…] That involved queries about my views on when the monetary system will begin to unravel, whether I hated Republicans, what I thought about Senator Jim DeMint moving over to the Heritage Foundation, the degree to which the media is biased, and if my opinions have changed on any issues. […]
[…] dealt with queries about whether I hate Republicans and whether my views have changed on anything, the newest edition of “Question of the Week” asks for my opinion about Senator DeMint […]
As Lord Acton said, “Power corrupts, and absolute power corrupts absolutely.”
My consolations for your loss Dan…