A couple of weeks ago, I offered some guarded praise for Paul Ryan’s budget, pointing out that it satisfies the most important requirement of fiscal policy by restraining spending – to an average of 3.1 percent per year over the next 10 years – so that government grows slower than the productive sector of the economy (I call this my Golden Rule).
I was more effusive in my comments about Senator Rand Paul’s budget, which limited the growth of the federal budget over the next 10 years to an average of 2.2 percent each year.
Now the Republican Study Committee from the House of Representatives has put forth a plan that also deserves considerable applause. Like Senator Paul, the RSC plan would impose immediate significant fiscal discipline such that spending in 2017 would be about the same level as it is this year.
Think of this as being similar to the very successful fiscal reforms of New Zealand and Canada in the 1990s.
After the initial period of spending restraint, the budget would be allowed to grow, but only about as fast as the private economy. This chart shows spending levels for the Obama budget, the Paul Ryan budget, the Rand Paul budget, and the RSC budget.
A couple of final points.
1. For all the whining and complaining from the pro-spending lobbies, the RSC budget is hardly draconian. Federal spending, measured as a share of GDP, would only drop to where it was when Bill Clinton left office.
2. One preferable feature of the Rand Paul budget is that the Kentucky Senator eliminates four needless and wasteful federal departments – Commerce, Education, Energy, and Housing and Urban Development. As far as I can tell, no departments are eliminated in the RSC plan. Also, Senator Paul’s plan is bolder on tax reform, scrapping the corrupt internal revenue code and replacing it with a simple and fair flat tax.
3. The RSC comes perilously close to winning a Bob Dole Award. The first chapter of their proposal fixates on symptoms of debt and deficits rather than the real problem of excessive government spending. Indeed, the first six charts all relate to deficits and debt, creating an easy opening for leftists to say they can solve the mis-defined problem with higher taxes.
There are lots of other details worth exploring, but the main lesson is that restraining spending is the key to good fiscal policy.
And that’s what’s happening. Indeed, the good news is that policymakers have proposed several budget plans that would shrink the burden of spending as a share of GDP. It’s refreshing to debate the features of several good plans (rather than comparing the warts in the competing plans during the big-government Bush years).
The bad news is that Harry Reid and Barack Obama will succeed in blocking any progress this year, so America will move ever closer to becoming another Greece.
[…] Rand Paul and the Republican Study Committee also have produced balanced budget plans. Even as scored by the statists at the Congressional […]
[…] budget plan, even the very admirable proposals put forth by Sen. Rand Paul and the House Republican Study Committee, merely restrains the growth of federal […]
[…] his hair on fire screaming warnings (and justly so), there are choices. Republicans have proposed three alternative budgets in recent weeks, any one of which will solve our entitlement crisis, restrain spending (the root of […]
Still don’t know why any net increase in our budget is a reason to celebrate.
I met Bill Clinton about a dozen times while he was governor, and he always was able to blend in with whatever crowd he was with. Just a few days before he took office in 1993, I visited with a friend of mine who was a Baptist pastor, and he had the opportunity to join a group of evangelical leaders from around the country who came to Little Rock to meet with Clinton. My friend made the same observation that I had made. Clinton was quoting scripture and talking about his time with Billy Graham etc and he blended right in.
The main point I am trying to make is simple. The conservative Republicans took over Congress in 1994 and cut the budget and introduced Welfare Reform to President Clinton and he went along with it. I give him credit for doing so and I am afraid Obama is not so wise.
I am glad to spread the news about your videos that point out the slowdown of spending growth under Clinton and Reagan.
[…] New Budget from Republican Study Committee Reduces Burden of Government to Where It Was When Bill Cl… […]