When I think about taxes, my first instinct is to rip up the corrupt internal revenue code and implement a simple and fair flat tax.
When I think about Social Security, my first instinct is to copy dozens of other nations and implement personal retirement accounts.
Unfortunately, the political system rarely generates opportunities to enact big reforms that actually solve problems and increase freedom. Instead, we’re stuck with proposals that make things modestly better or modestly worse.
So you can imagine my sense of dissatisfaction that I’m getting peppered with questions about whether the one-year 2-percentage point payroll tax holiday should be extended.
But it’s more complicated than that. The Democrats in the Senate want to make the temporary tax cut even bigger and “offset” that tax cut with some soak-the-rich tax increases. Republicans, meanwhile, are frozen like deer in the headlights. They understandably don’t like the Democrat plan, but they seem reluctant to support anything else, not even a “clean” extension of the current policy.
Here are a handful of observations.
* The Democrat’s proposal for a one-year payroll tax cut financed by a permanent income tax hike on investors, entrepreneurs, and small business owners would be a big net negative for US job creation and competitiveness.
* A “clean” extension of the payroll tax holiday would modestly improve incentives for work, but the temporary nature of the tax cut substantially weakens pro-growth effects.
* Ideally, the extension of the tax holiday should be financed by reducing the growth of federal spending.
* There are other tax cuts, such as permanent reductions in marginal income tax rates and/or permanent reductions in the double taxation of saving and investment, that would have a better impact on the economy.
* There are other tax cuts, such as expanded credits, deductions, preferences, exemptions, and shelters, that have no positive impact on the economy.
* A payroll tax holiday does not undermine Social Security since the Trust Fund is nothing but a big pile of IOUs.
* The best incremental reform would be a permanent reduction in the payroll tax, with the money channeled to personal retirement accounts. This would lower the tax burden of work while reducing the long-run burden of entitlement spending.
* This discussion of payroll taxes and incremental reform should not distract us from the enormously important issue of genuinely fixing entitlement programs, something that is needed to save America from Greek-style fiscal collapse at some point in the future.
So what does all this mean? Simply stated, there are many other fiscal reforms that I prefer, but a temporary extension of the payroll tax holiday is better than nothing – assuming, of course, it is not poisoned by accompanying class-warfare tax hikes.
Last but not least, let me close with a political observation. I’ve commented several times about Republicans being the “stupid party.” Well, if GOPers paint themselves into a corner such that they can be accused of supporting tax cuts for the “rich” while opposing tax cuts for workers, that will set a new record for being tone-deaf and brain-dead.
[…] Los recortes impositivos permanentes del lado de la oferta fomentan una mayor prosperidad, no recortes fiscales temporales al estilo keynesiano. […]
[…] Permanent supply-side tax cuts encourage more prosperity, not temporary Keynesian-style tax cuts. […]
[…] the marginal tax rate on work, politicians are only considering a temporary reduction, which would greatly reduce any potential […]
[…] I wrote back in 2011, it’s possible that a temporary reduction in the payroll tax rate could have some positive […]
[…] not a big fan of fiddling with the payroll tax, and I definitely worry about making major […]
[…] not convinced that adjusting the payroll tax will have significant benefits. What’s the evidence that companies […]
[…] not convinced that adjusting the payroll tax will have significant benefits. What’s the evidence that […]
[…] back-door industrial policy in the tax code. And I’ve also written that tax holidays are a less-than-ideal way of reducing taxes. So this suggests that I’m against the Louisiana […]
[…] we had a gimmicky payroll tax holiday for the past few years. And it’s true that Obama has signaled that he wants to increase the […]
[…] are headwinds that are undermining job creation, such as Obamacare, higher payroll tax rates, and the President’s class-warfare tax […]
[…] though President Obama just got his class-warfare tax increase on the so-called rich (as well as a big tax hike on all American workers), is seems all that did is whet his appetite for even more of our […]
[…] we had a gimmicky payroll tax holiday for the past few years. And it’s true that Obama has signaled that he wants to increase the […]
[…] we had a gimmicky payroll tax holiday for the past few years. And it’s true that Obama has signaled that he wants to increase the […]
[…] hinder the economy, but his proposed solution is a repeat of the Keynesian payroll tax holiday. I’ve previously explained that temporary tax gimmicks don’t generate long-term job creat…, so I obviously don’t see why a policy which hasn’t worked the past two years will […]
[…] but not least, I briefly talk about the payroll tax fight and the prospects (or lack thereof) for real entitlement reform. Rate this: Share […]
There will be no corresponding cuts to fund this “tax holiday”. This is a lame political ploy by Democrats to fool the public into believing they are actually cutting taxes and try to paint Republicans as not caring about the middle class. The rates remain the same and the amount of extra take home pay per week is almost unnoticeable.
I guess I can understand Republican’s hesitancy in playing their game and giving them a political victory. Democrats aren’t going to do this deal without a tax increase on the rich. Republicans will lose either way. We should be supporting real reform, not getting caught up in arguing about gimmicks.