My New Year’s Resolution was to stop making fun of the Transportation Security Administration. Not because I changed my mind about the bureaucracy and its level of (in)competence, but rather because I felt as if I was taking candy from a baby. Kicking the TSA is just too easy.
But I can’t resist low-hanging fruit. I recently mocked the TSA for repeatedly failing to catch an undercover agent who carried a gun through the porno-scan machines.
Now it’s time to abuse the bureaucrats for another world-class blunder. A man recently got on a flight with three of the weapons that were used to hijack planes on 9-11. According to the New York Post.
A passenger managed to waltz past JFK’s ramped-up security gantlet with three boxcutters in his carry-on luggage — easily boarding an international flight while carrying the weapon of choice of the 9/11 hijackers, sources told The Post yesterday. The stunning breach grounded the flight for three hours Saturday night and drew fury from Port Authority cops, who accused the Transportation Security Administration of being asleep on the job. “In case anyone has forgotten, the TSA was created because of a couple boxcutter incidents,” said one PAPD source, referring to the weapons used by al Qaeda operatives to commandeer the jets they later slammed into the World Trade Center and the Pentagon on 9/11.
In an unusual display of honesty, a TSA bureaucrat basically admitted that passengers were not in danger because of other factors. Which raises an obvious question of why we maintain an expensive bureaucracy that has no impact other than to inconvenience the traveling public?
The TSA spokeswoman Davis insisted that the traveling public was not at risk. “There have been a number of additional security layers that have been implemented on aircraft that would prevent someone from causing harm with boxcutters,” she insisted. “They include the possible presence of armed federal air marshals, hardened cockpit doors, flight crews trained in self-defense and a more vigilant traveling public who have demonstrated a willingness to intervene.”
[…] that’s not the case, as I’ve previously pointed out (see here, here, and […]
[…] That’s even worse than the part of the plan that would increase taxes on airline travel to further subsidize the Keystone Cops of the TSA. […]
[…] That’s even worse than the part of the plan that would increase taxes on airline travel to further subsidize the Keystone Cops of the TSA. […]
[…] That’s even worse than the part of the plan that would increase taxes on airline travel to further subsidize the Keystone Cops of the TSA. […]
“Flight crews trained in self defense”? Good one. Are they trying to say that the 110lb female or the very neatly dressed Nancy-boy attendant, after a two hour “self defense” class, is going to be able to engage in hand to hand combat with some terrorist with a box cutter? You know…the guy who has been training daily…all day long, in the art of combat. That guy.
Uh huh. I’m sure that would end well.
[…] in mind that these are the geniuses who still fail to catch guns and box cutters – even when using the body-scan […]
[…] let’s not forget that the TSA inevitably fails when subjected to independent […]
[…] 6, 2011 by Dan Mitchell I used to have lots of posts about TSA inefficiency and stupidity, but then I got discouraged and stopped. It seemed pointless to discuss the issue when there was no […]
So tell me again why we have the TSA??? Oh, yeah, government jobs program…
“and a more vigilant traveling public who have demonstrated a willingness to intervene.”
A begrudging acceptance that 9-11 will never happen again. This has been the case since 9-11, see United 93. What spokeswoman Davis will not acknoweledge is that the scope and grope jobs program called the TSA has contributed nothing to that fact.
Apparently he didn’t look like a 75 year old granny with her boobies slightly hanging. He slipped right by. TSA may start tazzin’ the older folks too just in case!