The Wall Street Journal opines about the latest bone-headed move by New York politicians to drive away productive activity. Connecticut is not exactly a low-tax jurisdiction, but sometimes being less worse is all that’s necessary to win a tax competition battle.
Connecticut Governor Jodi Rell, a Republican who usually doesn’t mind higher taxes…has nonetheless declared a tax-competition border war amid the New York Assembly’s bid “to vastly increase the tax liability of hedge fund professionals who work in New York.” That’s how Mrs. Rell put it in a letter last week to the New York Hedge Fund Roundtable, imploring its members to relocate to her state and offering to do “anything possible to assist you,” including the aid of state “relocation specialists.” …Arguably the hallmark of bad decision-making is whatever they cook up in Albany—which is planning to tax the carried interest income of New York-based hedge fund managers who live out of state at the top ordinary tax rate of 8.97%. …the New York Assembly…thinks it can raise $50 million by targeting bridge-and-tunnel commuters to Manhattan too. It never will, given the mobility of capital. New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg—who knows the combined city-state top tax rate approaches 13%—told the New York Observer that “I think it’s the best thing that ever happened to Connecticut. I can’t imagine why every hedge fund wouldn’t pick up tomorrow and move.” …Last September—after years of tax-hike plans that fell through—Mrs. Rell and the Democratic legislature raised the top income tax rate to 6.5% from 5% on filers making more than $500,000. The state’s combined state-local tax burden of 11.1% is the third highest in the nation, according to the Tax Foundation, after New York (No. 2) and New Jersey (No. 1). Those sins duly noted, Mrs. Rell is nonetheless right in this case, and you can expect a further migration to the Nutmeg State from the economic nut house that is New York.
[…] biggest beneficiaries of this loophole are concentrated in a tiny handful of wealthy counties in New York, California, New Jersey, and […]
[…] because it has the highest income tax rate of any state. But there are also strong arguments that New York, Illinois, and New Jersey deserve the worst […]
[…] because it has the highest income tax rate of any state. But there are also strong arguments that New York, Illinois, and New Jersey deserve the worst […]
[…] budget requirements haven’t prevented states like California, Illinois, Connecticut, and New York from adopting bad […]
[…] – Since New York is one of the worst states, Pataki has guilt by implication. But he did lower a few taxes during his tenure, and you also have […]
[…] – Since New York is one of the worst states, Pataki has guilt by implication. But he did lower a few taxes during his tenure, and you also have […]
[…] Well, I don’t know of any big landmarks that they could have traded to avoid an income tax. About the only “good” thing to say is that New York’s tax system is probably even worse. […]
[…] requirement. Yet those rules don’t prevent states like California, Illinois, Connecticut, and New York from adopting bad fiscal […]
[…] bad the state and the city are high-tax hell […]
[…] It’s just a matter of time before states such as New York and California are beset by fiscal crisis. When a jurisdiction has something special – like […]
[…] impact of high state taxes. Simply stated, when states such as California, Illinois, and New York get too greedy, the geese with the golden eggs fly across the […]
[…] impact of high state taxes. Simply stated, when states such as California, Illinois, and New York get too greedy, the geese with the golden eggs fly across the […]
[…] these are remarkable numbers, they shouldn’t be a surprise. I’ve written about the failures of New York and California, and I’ve also commented on the success of […]
[…] impact of high state taxes. Simply stated, when states such as California, Illinois, and New York get too greedy, the geese with the golden eggs fly across the […]
[…] remarkable numbers, they shouldn’t be a surprise. I’ve written about the failures of New York and California, and I’ve also commented on the success of […]
[…] bad the state and the city are high-tax hell holes. Rate this: Share […]
[…] Moving across state lines is generally not something that happens overnight. But this giant tax hike is sure to be the tipping point for a few investors, entrepreneurs, rich people, and employers. Each year, more and more of them will decide they can be more successful and more profitable by re-domiciling in low-tax states. When that happens, Illinois politicians will get a lesson about the Laffer Curve, just as happened in Maryland, Oregon, and New York. […]
[…] politicians will get a lesson about the Laffer Curve, just as happened in Maryland, Oregon, and New York. Daniel J. Mitchell • January 11, 2011 @ 2:15 pm Filed under: Government and […]
[…] politicians will get a lesson about the Laffer Curve, just as happened in Maryland, Oregon, and New York. GA_googleAddAttr("AdOpt", "0"); GA_googleAddAttr("Origin", "other"); GA_googleAddAttr("LangId", […]
I’m looking for postdoc positions right now, and although there have been lots of jobs posted in my field at Cornell, I haven’t even considered applying there because of the tax rate in New York. If it came down to New York or Starbucks, I might begin to think about New York as a possibility, but it would still be a tough decision.
[…] Moving across state lines is generally not something that happens overnight. But this giant tax hike is sure to be the tipping point for a few investors, entrepreneurs, rich people, and employers. Each year, more and more of them will decide they can be more successful and more profitable by re-domiciling in low-tax states. When that happens, Illinois politicians will get a lesson about the Laffer Curve, just as happened in Maryland, Oregon, and New York. […]