I support the the right to keep and bear arms. That said, the horrific school shooting in Texas almost leads me to wish that guns did not exist. Here’s some of what I said as part of a recent episode of The Square Circle.
My main argument during the program is that gun control simply does not work. Such laws might deter law-abiding people from owning guns, but bad people – especially the nutjobs – obviously don’t care about breaking rules.
It is true that nationwide guns bans and gun confiscation might make it harder for these evil people to obtain firearms, but watch this video from Reason (or look at this polling data) if you actually think that’s a practical approach.
Some people argue that it would be better to allow teachers and other school staff to possess weapons.
That would be better than nothing, but who knows if that would have a measurable impact.
Other people say the problem is mental health and/or societal decay.
I’m sure those are factors as well, but pointing out problems is not the same as devising solutions.
Though maybe there is a way we can strengthen “red flag laws” while also guarding against abuse. I’m skeptical, but would like to be proven wrong.
For purposes of today’s column, I want to focus on what appears to be negligent behavior by the cops in Texas. Here are some excerpts from a report by the New York Times.
The grief of families in Uvalde, Texas, was compounded by anger and frustration on Thursday as police leaders struggled to answer questions about the horrific hour it took to halt a gunman who opened fire on students and teachers inside Robb Elementary School.
…Parents had massed outside the school on Tuesday as gunfire erupted inside, urging the police who were holding them at bay to go in and stop the carnage. …An armed Uvalde school district officer, who had been nearby, responded…the gunman began firing at the windows and entered the building. The officer did not open fire. …the gunman…went through an unlocked door at 11:40 a.m…and began shooting inside. Police officers, including the school district officer, went into the school minutes later. By the time officers reported that the gunman had been killed around 1 p.m., he had shot dead 19 students and two teachers.
We don’t yet know how quickly this dirtbag killed the kids, but a delay of more than one hour obviously gave him plenty of time.
During that terrifying time — well over an hour — parents of students who were trapped in the school gathered outside the building… Some were physically restrained by the police in a scene that witnesses described as disorder bordering on mayhem. …“Parents were crying and some were fighting verbally with the police and screaming that they wanted their children,” Marcela Cabralez, a pastor, said. Miguel Palacios, a small-business owner, said frantic parents were so upset that at one point they tried to take down the school’s chain-link fence. “The parents were on one side of the fence, the Border Patrol and police were on the other side of the fence, and they were trying to tear it open,” he said. Some of the parents implored the heavily armed police officers at the chaotic scene to storm the school. Others, including those who were off-duty members of law enforcement, went inside themselves to try to find their own children. “There were plenty of men out there armed to the teeth that could have gone in faster,” said Javier Cazares, 43, who arrived at the school on Tuesday as the attack was taking place. He said he could hear gunfire; his daughter, Jacklyn, was inside.
Sadly, the cops in Uvalde either lacked modern training or they disregarded that training.
…questions remained about the decision by the police at the scene to await the arrival of specially trained officers from the Border Patrol to finally storm through the classroom door roughly an hour after officers had first pulled back. …Officers are now trained to disable an active shooter as quickly as possible, before rescuing victims and without waiting for a tactical team or special equipment to arrive.
As I said in the interview, I would not want to charge into a classroom and face hostile gunfire. But if I signed up to be a cop, I would understand that periodic bravery was part of my employment contract.
If I then failed to act, I would live in shame for the rest of my life and would not argue about getting fired and losing my pension.
P.S. When writing on gun-related issues, I always like to share what some honest folks on the left have written.
- In 2012, I shared some important observations from Jeffrey Goldberg, a left-leaning writer for The Atlantic. In his column, he basically admitted his side was wrong about gun control.
- Then, in 2013, I wrote about a column by Justin Cronin in the New York Times.
He self-identified as a liberal, but explained how real-world events have led him to become a supporter of private gun ownership.
- In 2015, I shared a column by Jamelle Bouie in Slate, who addressed the left’s fixation on trying to ban so-called assault weapons and explains that such policies are meaningless.
- In 2017, Leah Libresco wrote in the Washington Post that advocates of gun control are driven by emotion rather empirical research and evidence.
- Last but not least, in 2019, Alex Kingsbury confessed in the New York Times that his long-held dream of gun confiscation was utterly impractical.
[…] thing to understand is that what happened with the FBI wasn’t a heat-of-the-moment mistake, like we saw with law enforcement in Uvalde, […]
[…] to understand is that what happened with the FBI wasn’t a heat-of-the-moment mistake, like we saw with law enforcement in Uvalde, […]
[…] A Lesson from the Texas School Shooting […]
[…] part of my recent appearance on The Square Circle (we discussed Uvalde police, gun control, and Ukraine), I said that the new Social Security numbers were the under-reported […]
Dan, you perhaps don’t know the encouraging history of DGUs – Defensive Gun Uses.
There are a couple of million DGUs in America every year, and each one either mitigates or eliminates a violent crime. How come? because criminals are happy to shoot other people but don’t like being shot themselves! This is not only obvious, it was also verified by the study of almost 2,000 incarcerated felons Open Page conducted by criminology Professors Peter Rossi and James Wright at the University of Massachusetts. see:
http://www.discouragecriminals.net/criminals-fear-being-shot-and-injured
There’s lots more at: http://www.DiscourageCriminals.net/dgus
[…] A Lesson from the Texas School Shooting […]
[…] weeks ago, I shared my response to the awful school shooting in Texas. The topic of gun controlcame up once again in a new episode […]
[…] weeks ago, I shared my response to the awful school shooting in Texas. The topic of gun control came up once again in a new […]
[…] weeks ago, I shared my response to the awful school shooting in Texas. The topic of gun control came up once again in a new episode […]
[…] part of my recent appearance on The Square Circle (we discussed Uvalde police, gun control, and Ukraine), I said that the new Social Security numbers were the under-reported […]
[…] part of my recent appearance on The Square Circle (we discussed Uvalde police, gun control, and Ukraine), I said that the new Social Security numbers were the under-reported […]
Teach kids to tell 911 an illegal alien locked the door and is handing marijuana cigarettes to the kids. I’ll bet $5 dollars the cops come rushing in inside of ten minutes.
All these shootings occur at government schools. The number of victims accelerated past 50 in 1986, when Physics Today published a letter arguing that ABM treaties violate the Second Amendment. Since that time demands that the Bill of Rights be shortened have also increased, not that schools be privatized. Why?
Hi there Dan,
Thank you for covering this topic. I appreciate all of your links, as I write and speak on this topic regularly. It’s great to have these links to refer to. I was grateful for a recent segment https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zchq7TJ2Jy0 with Jesse Watters on Fox, where I had a few minutes to lay out why armed response is the only way to stop these killers. If you ever need information or context on how theses armed programs work, I’m happy to share information.
I first met you at the Leadership Program of the Rockies, where I am a graduate. Thank you for your work.
Laura
FASTERColorado.com SpringsTaxpayers.com LauraCarno.com Senior Fellow at IWF.org Author of Government Ruins Nearly Everything https://www.amazon.com/Government-Ruins-Nearly-Everything-Reclaiming/dp/0692672753 Gardening From Scratch IG https://www.instagram.com/gardeningscratch/ and FB https://www.facebook.com/Gardening-From-Scratch-105701784501367
http://www.facebook.com/lauracarno http://twitter.com/lauracarno http://www.linkedin.com/profile/view?id=19365917
“Officers are now trained to disable an active shooter as quickly as possible”
Forget this, issue shoot to kill on sight orders. That might stop a few of these nutjobs, no fame, no name in lights, just death.
Mr. Mitchell,
Red flag laws are a bad idea, as once that genie is out of the bottle, the government, which is known for gross overreach (to put it politely), will twist that law and make it so /anyone/ may fit the criteria.
Food for thought.
Kevin
Susquehanna County, PA
Sent from my Behemoth Dell 690
[…] A Lesson from the Texas School Shooting […]
[…] A Lesson from the Texas School Shooting — International Liberty […]
We need more education about firearms !
My Grandfather taught me about guns when I was three !
Sitting on his knees while target shooting with a Ruger pistol.
He bought me a single shot 22.cal rifle when I was 5.
My father taught me more when we went target practicing.
They all took me hunting and taught me much more.
I was also taught a deep consideration for others !
The NRA is denigrated by many but they offer excellent education courses
for children and their parents.
It is my opinion that there is a drastic need for education on each of
these subjects regardless of
Political persuasion !
[…] Source: A Lesson from the Texas School Shooting | International Liberty […]
Dawn Watson’s comment hits the nail exactly on the head.
In an ideal world, firearms would be unnecessary. We do not, however, live in an ideal world. Advocates of gun control ignore repeated instances of legitimate firearm use (hunting, self-defense, sport) and the horrors inflicted upon unarmed populations by their governments (Australia, North Korea, etc.), as well as the harm their policies render to the most vulnerable members of our population, all for a crusade against a tool. Tools do not act on their own.
As far as the causes behind mass shootings, it’s much more complex than “mental health” or “societal decline.” Bad parenting, a culture that values and promotes perpetual adolescence, and toxic public school environments must surely share equal parts of the blame.
A Blue State with spine could pass mandatory gun and ammunition insurance that could steadily eliminate the supply available to criminals and the mentally disturbed. Insurance companies are in a good position to use artificial intelligence to price the risk of harm of weapons and ammunition in the hands of particular persons. Education, employment, social media, health, and other data can be continually reviewed on a massive scale to identify factors that affect risk. After all, isn’t risk identification the real goal?
Micro imprints on guns and ammunition would ease the identification and tracing of any incident that caused harm and associate the item with the required insurance. The cost of insurance would be minor for those with little risk and prohibitive (if available at all) for those people, weapons, and ammunition with great risk.
Black market sales would gradually become prohibitively expensive. Better training and best practices would be encouraged by the economics of the insurance. Victims and their families would be compensated. Gun manufacturers might even find less lethal to be more profitable.
This was horrific as is every mass killing regardless whether weapon is gun or vehicle or pressure cookers. Evil finds a way.
With legislation as with words, sometimes the best, most beneficial response is saying or doing nothing. Acting by doing things that will have very long term and lasting effect when emotions are raging out of all bounds more often than not does even more harm. But it will give a false sense of security–make people feel “safe” because they “DID something” even if analytically the “something” is a ‘nothing’ in real world results except to strip more liberty from the people and give it to bureaucrats.
Like you red flag laws raise a field of red flags for me though I can see how some limited and very carefully administered ones could help…but we know that there will be those who will find ways to abuse them. They always do.
We’ve undermined our foundation of family and faith and now, we’re reaping whirlwinds.