After the people of the United Kingdom voted to escape the European Union, I wondered whether the Conservative Party would “find a new Margaret Thatcher” to enact pro-market reforms and thus “take advantage of a golden opportunity” to “prosper in a post-Brexit world.”
The current Prime Minister, Boris Johnson, deserves praise for turning the Brexit vote into Brexit reality, but his fiscal policy has been atrocious.
Not only is he failing to be another Margaret Thatcher, he’s a bigger spender than left-leaning Tory leaders such as David Cameron and Theresa May.
Let’s look at some British media coverage of how Boris Johnson and Rishi Sunak (the Chancellor of the Exchequer) have sided with government over taxpayers.
Allister Heath of the Telegraph has a brutal assessment of their profligacy.
Rishi Sunak’s message, repeated over and over again, as he unveiled a historic, epoch-defining rise in public spending financed by ruinous tax increases. It was a Labour Budget with a Tory twist and the kind of Spending Review that Gordon Brown would have relished… the cash was sprinkled in every possible direction. Sunak is Chancellor, but he was executing Boris Johnson’s cakeist vision: a meddling, hyperactive, managerialist, paternalistic and almost municipal state which refuses to accept any limits to its ambition or ability to spend.
…The scale of the tax increases is staggering. …This will propel the tax burden from 33.5 per cent of GDP before the pandemic to 36.2 per cent by 2026-27, its highest since the early 1950s… The picture on spending is equally grim: we are on course for a new normal of around 41.6 per cent of GDP by 2026-27, the largest sustained share of GDP since the late 1970s. …The Budget and Spending Review are thus a huge victory for Left-wing ideas, even if the shift is being implemented by Right-wing Brexiteers who have forgotten that the economic case for Brexit wasn’t predicated on Britain becoming more like France or Spain. …Labour shouldn’t be feeling too despondent: the party may not be in office, but when it comes to the economy and public spending, they are very much in power.
Writing for CapX, James Heywood explains one of the adverse consequences of big-government Toryism.
Simply stated, the U.K. will go from bad to worse in the Tax Foundation’s International Tax Competitiveness Index.
…in the Cameron-Osborne era, the Conservatives focused on heavily on making Britain competitive and business-friendly, with significant cuts to the headline rate of corporation tax. …in his recent Tory conference speech, Boris Johnson trumpeted the virtues of an ‘open society and free market economy’, promising that his was a government committed to creating a ‘low tax economy’. Unfortunately, when it comes to UK tax policy the direction of travel is concerningly divorced from the rhetoric.
The latest iteration of the US-based Tax Foundation’s annual International Tax Competitiveness Index placed the UK 22nd out of 37 OECD countries when it comes to the overall performance of our tax system. …Nor does the UK’s current ranking factor in the Government’s plans for future tax rises. …the headline rate of corporation tax had fallen to 19% and was set to fall to 17% by 2020. That further fall had already been cancelled during Sajid Javid’s brief stint as Chancellor, in order to pay for additional NHS spending. At the last Budget, Rishi Sunak went much further, setting out plans to gradually raise the rate from 19% to 25% in April 2023. That is a huge tax measure by anyone’s standards… On top of that we have the recently announced Health and Social Care Levy… If we factor all these new measures into the Tax Foundation’s Competitiveness Index, the UK falls to a dismal 30th out of 37 countries.
For what it’s worth, the United Kingdom’s competitiveness decline will be very similar to the drop in America’s rankings if Biden’s fiscal plan is enacted.
In other words, there’s not much difference between the left-wing policy of Joe Biden and the (supposedly) right-wing policy of Britain’s Conservative Party.
No wonder a British cartoonist thought it was appropriate to show Rishi Sunak morphing into Gorden Brown, the high-tax, big-government Chancellor of the Exchequer under Tony Blair.
I’ll close with the observation that conservatives and libertarians in the United Kingdom need to create their own version of the no-tax-hike pledge.
That pledge, organized by Americans for Tax Reform, has helped protect many (but not all) Republicans from politically foolish tax hikes.
It is good politics to have a no-tax pledge, but I’m much more focused on the fact that opposing tax hikes is good policy.
[…] way of creating the opportunity for a better approach. The fact that British politicians have been increasing fiscal burdens simply means that the U.K is not taking advantage of the […]
[…] have been very pessimistic in recent years about the United Kingdom. Now, having just finished giving speeches in Bristol and […]
[…] have been very pessimistic in recent years about the United Kingdom. Now, having just finished giving speeches in Bristol and […]
[…] have been very pessimistic in recent years about the United Kingdom. Now, having just finished giving speeches in Bristol and […]
[…] have been very pessimistic in recent years about the United Kingdom. Now, having just finished giving speeches in Bristol and […]
[…] Conservative Party became recklessly profligateunder Boris Johnson, causing a big bump in the country’s (already excessive) spending […]
[…] like the bipartisan mess in the United Kingdom – thanks to Blair, Brown, Cameron, May, Johnson, and […]
[…] Conservative Party became recklessly profligateunder Boris Johnson, causing a big bump in the country’s (already excessive) spending […]
[…] Conservative Party became recklessly profligate under Boris Johnson, causing a big bump in the country’s (already excessive) spending […]
[…] data in Radford’s article is a damning indictment of the supposedly conservative government in the United […]
[…] data in Radford’s article is a damning indictment of the supposedly conservative government in the United […]
[…] data in Radford’s article is a damning indictment of the supposedly conservative government in the United […]
[…] data in Radford’s article is a damning indictment of the supposedly conservative government in the United […]
[…] have deviated from Reaganism, the Conservatives in the United Kingdom have deviatedfrom Thatcherism. Except even worse. Republicans in the USA acquiesce to higher spending. […]
[…] Republicans have deviated from Reaganism, the Conservatives in the United Kingdom have deviated from Thatcherism. Except even worse. Republicans in the USA acquiesce to higher spending. Tories in […]
[…] This is an indictment of former Prime Minister Boris Johnson’s profligacy. […]
[…] I’m now pessimistic about the nation’s outlook. Truss was forced to resign and big-government Tories (akin to big-government Republicans) are back in […]
[…] I’m now pessimistic about the nation’s outlook. Truss was forced to resign and big-government Tories (akin to big-government Republicans) are back in […]
[…] my disappointment, then, when subsequent Conservative Prime Ministers did nothing (Theresa May) or expanded the burden of government (Boris […]
[…] my disappointment, then, when subsequent Conservative Prime Ministers did nothing (Theresa May) or expanded the burden of government (Boris […]
[…] Republicans in the United States, so it naturally follows that I don’t like big-government Tories in the United […]
[…] big-government Republicans in the United States, so it naturally follows that I don’t like big-government Tories in the United […]
[…] Brexit (the United Kingdom voting to leave the European Union), but I’m very disappointed about the subsequent failure to create […]
[…] (the United Kingdom voting to leave the European Union), but I’m very disappointed about the subsequent failure to create […]
[…] in the United Kingdom for the Free Market Road Show and had planned on writing today about the awful economic policies of Boris Johnson, the supposedly Conservative Prime […]
[…] in the United Kingdom for the Free Market Road Show and had planned on writing today about the awful economic policies of Boris Johnson, the supposedly Conservative Prime […]
[…] in the United Kingdom for the Free Market Road Show and had planned on writing today about the awful economic policies of Boris Johnson, the supposedly Conservative Prime […]
[…] selections that post-Brexit Britain has actually made are great. As financial expert Dan Mitchell recently put it, when it pertains to tax obligation as well as investing, “There’s very little […]
[…] par la Grande-Bretagne après le Brexit ne sont pas bons. En tant qu’économiste Dan Mitchell mettez-le récemment, quand il s’agit d’impôts et de dépenses, « Il n’y a pas beaucoup de […]
[…] par la Grande-Bretagne après le Brexit ne sont pas bons. En tant qu’économiste Dan Mitchell mettez-le récemment, en ce qui concerne les impôts et les dépenses, « Il n’y a pas beaucoup de différence […]
[…] not all the choices that post-Brexit Britain has made are good. As economist Dan Mitchell recently put it, when it comes to tax and spending, “There’s not much difference between the left-wing policy […]
[…] not all the choices that post-Brexit Britain has made are good. As economist Dan Mitchell recently put it, when it comes to tax and spending, “There’s not much difference between the left-wing […]
You are wrong in this one. Libertarianism with small government will not work. There are roughly two kind of governments: democratic and authoritarian. In democomcracy people will always vote for bigger government, In authroritarian countries, thw tough guys will get the power and resources, not the nerds or STEM guys.
Small taxes and small government is just an ideology that is popular among nerds. It can not work in real life.
From my perspective, Brexit was/is a moment of original policy, moving away from herd politics, toward a freer and more independent course of sovereignty, responding to those interested in a less layered system of governance. Less governance leads to a smaller public sector overhead, accepting the natural, competitive, market, economy. Less government reduces the opportunity for collusive governance…like the military industrial state that Eisenhower warned us about. This “Deep State” phenomena exists, and has grown where the state, and sectors of the economy collude to favor their interests than those of the people…health,and education, being prime examples. Already, half the income of the nation, and individuals,is in the hands of government,meaning that individual freedoms to choose the use of their earnings, have been surrendered to a centralized command bureaucracy….a result resembling that of the frog in gradually hotter water