Long-time readers know that I periodically pour cold water on the notion that China is an economic superstar.
Yes, China did engage in some economic liberalization late last century, and those reforms should be applauded because they were very successful in reducing severe poverty.
But from a big-picture perspective, all that really happened is that China went from terrible policy (Maoist communism) to bad policy (best described as mass cronyism).
Economic Freedom of the World has the best data. According to the latest edition, China’s score for economic liberty rose from a horrible 3.69 in 1990 to 6.21 in 2018.
That’s a big improvement, but that still leaves China in the bottom quartile (ranking #124 in the world). Better than Venezuela (#162), to be sure, but way behind even uncompetitive welfare states such as Greece (#92), France (#58), and Italy (#51).
And I fear China’s score will get even worse in the near future.
Why? Because it seems President Xi is going to impose class-warfare tax increases.
In an article for the Guardian, Phillip Inman shares some of the details.
China’s president has vowed to “adjust excessive incomes” in a warning to the country’s super-rich that the state plans to redistribute wealth… The policy goal comes amid a sweeping push by Beijing to rein in
the country’s largest private firms in industries, ranging from technology to education. …Xi…is expected to expand wealth taxes and raise income tax rates… Some reforms could be far reaching, including higher taxes on capital gains, inheritance and property. Higher public sector wages are also expected to be part of the package.
And here are some excerpts from a report by Jane Li for Quartz.
Chinese president Xi Jinping yesterday sent a stark message to the country’s wealthy: It is time to redistribute their excessive fortunes. …Another reason for the Party’s focus on outsize wealth
is to reduce rival centers of power and influence in China, which has also been an impetus for its crackdown on the tech sector… China already has fairly high income tax rates for its wealthiest. That includes a top income tax rate of 45% for those who earn more than 960,000 yuan ($150,000) a year… Upcoming moves could include…a nationwide property tax.
These stories may warm the hearts of Joe Biden and Bernie Sanders, but they help to explain why I’m not optimistic about China’s economy.
If you review the Economic Freedom of the World data, you find that China is especially bad on fiscal policy (“size of government”), ranking #153.
That’s worse than China does even on regulation.
Yet the Chinese government is now going to impose higher taxes to fund even bigger government?!?
Is the goal to be even worse than Venezuela and Zimbabwe?
P.S. Many wealthy people in China (maybe even most of them) achieved their high incomes thanks to government favoritism, so there’s a very strong argument that their riches are undeserved. But the best policy response is getting rid of industrial policy rather than imposing tax increases that will hit both good rich people and bad rich people.
P.P.S. I’ve criticized both the OECD and IMF for advocating higher taxes in China. A few readers have sent emails asking whether those international bureaucracies might be deliberately trying to sabotage China’s economy and thus preserve the dominance of Europe and the United States. Given the wretched track records of the OECD and IMF, I think it’s far more likely that the bureaucrats from those organizations sincerely support those bad policies (especially since they get tax-free salaries and are sheltered from the negative consequences).
[…] Class warfare policies are discouraging entrepreneurship. […]
[…] Backsliding to more statism under President Xi. […]
[…] policy claim that China is an example of successful industrial policy, but that’s nonsense. Total nonsense. Utter nonsense. Unless there are sweeping pro-market reforms, China will continue to lag way […]
[…] policy claim that China is an example of successful industrial policy, but that’s nonsense. Total nonsense. Utter nonsense. Unless there are sweeping pro-market reforms, China will continue to lag way […]
[…] Backsliding to more statism under President Xi. […]
[…] Backsliding to more statism under President Xi. […]
[…] Xi’s backsliding to statism […]
[…] Xi’s backsliding to statism […]
[…] not that I have had an overly optimistic view of China (see here, here, here, and […]
[…] Which raises the obvious question of why people in the United States want to copy that failed approach? […]
[…] And it’s an indictment of President Xi, who is pushing China in the wrong direction – toward more statismand more government […]
[…] an indictment of President Xi, who is pushing China in the wrong direction – toward more statism and more government […]
[…] one of my long-standing observations is that China’s economy is not nearly as strong as some people think. Which is why I’m sharing this chart from a recent Bloomberg report […]
[…] it would be much more exciting and praiseworthy if the Chinese government (which has been backsliding in recent years) had proposed some something far […]
[…] For what it’s worth, my gut instinct is that cronyism is a much bigger problem in China’s economy that we see in the data from the WSJ […]
[…] For what it’s worth, my gut instinct is that cronyism is a much bigger problem in China’s economy that we see in the data from the WSJ […]
[…] For what it’s worth, my gut instinct is that cronyism is a much bigger problem in China’s economy that we see in the data from the […]
[…] as I noted last month in Part I of this series, it seems that President Xi is opting for the […]
Perhaps the Chinese Government should simply go back to basics and look up Sun Yat Sen (who was a follower of Henry George) and collect land rent via an unimproved land value tax (not a “property” or wealth tax), in other words, tax unearned, as opposed to earned, wealth.
Strange that Marx never realized Henry George had solved the class war problem by denying privileged access to – aka “absolute ownership” of – natural resources.
Essentially a Sovereign has three choices –
1. collect no revenue and go out of existence
2. tax everything indiscriminately and drive people and business away, or
3. just draw a revenue from what you really own, your lands, and forget the rest
The Arab Oil States are smarter than either West or East.