The most powerful argument for school choice is that children from poor families will be more likely to get a high-quality education. After all, these are the kids most likely to be trapped in failing government schools.
But there are lots of secondary arguments for school choice.
- A much better deal for taxpayers.
- Less racial segregation.
- More economic opportunity.
- Flexibility during a pandemic.
Today, we’re going to add to this list by considering the current controversy over whether “critical race theory” should be taught in schools.
I won’t bother trying to put forth my own definition of CRT.
But, for what it’s worth, I think it’s a good thing if kids learn that the United States (like all nations) has an imperfect history, while it’s wrong if kids are brainwashed into believing that they are either oppressors or victims simply because of skin color.
But what about people who think differently? Should I decide what schools teach, or should other people make those choices?
The right answer is that we don’t need a one-size-fits-all approach. Either mine or anyone else’s.
In a column for Reason, J.D. Tuccille says school choice is a way of letting parents pick the schools that best reflect their values.
…some states are banning the teaching of CRT—an approach that threatens to turn advocates of the ideology into free speech martyrs fighting the entrenched establishment. …families that choose how their children learn—my own included—rather than defaulting to government-run institutions…have largely escaped these battles.
By homeschooling, or micro-schooling, or picking private or charter schools, we can avoid curricula permeated with ideas we find toxic… Parents that…support CRT also have alternatives to battling over the content of schoolroom lessons. They can introduce their tykes to Ibram X. Kendi’s Antiracist Baby Picture Book, marinate their kids in CRT-infused homeschooling, or send them to one of many private schools that offer willing families an education steeped in the ideology. …if that’s what they want their kids to learn, let them do so in peace, and without zero-sum arguments about what children are taught in shared institutions.
Amen.
Critical race theory won’t be nearly so controversial if we let parents choose the type of education that’s best for their kids.
And the same is true for other contentious issues, ranging from phonics to prayer.
No wonder more and more states are shifting in the right direction on this issue.
P.S. If you want to learn more about school choice, I recommend this video.
P.P.S. It’s uplifting to see very successful school choice systems operate in nations such as Canada, Sweden, Chile, and the Netherlands.
[…] And the same thing happens with other contentious issues, such as teaching critical race theory. […]
[…] And the same thing happens with other contentious issues, such as teaching critical race theory. […]
[…] And the same thing happens with other contentious issues, such as teaching critical race theory. […]
[…] And the same thing happens with other contentious issues, such as teaching critical race theory. […]
[…] And the same thing happens with other contentious issues, such as teaching critical race theory. […]
[…] And the same thing happens with other contentious issues, such as teaching critical race theory. […]
[…] And the same thing happens with other contentious issues, such as teaching critical race theory. […]
[…] Brainwashing – It is good for kids to learn the good points and bad points about their nation’s history, but things like the “1619 Project” are academically […]
[…] What’s the main problem in K-12 education today? Based on news reports, one might think the top challenge involves hot-button social issues such as sex education and critical race theory. […]
[…] wondered we also need school choice because of what teacher unions are doing on issues such as critical race theory and school […]
[…] I’ve previously shared many stories of anti-gun political correctness in government schools (see here, here, here, here, here, and here). Makes me wonder whether that kind of nonsense is even more counterproductive to kids that some of the excesses of critical race theory. […]
[…] I’ve previously shared many stories of anti-gun political correctness in government schools (see here, here, here, here, here, and here). Makes me wonder whether that kind of nonsense is even more counterproductive to kids that some of the excesses of critical race theory. […]
[…] wondered we also need school choice because of what teacher unions are doing on issues such as critical race theory and school […]
[…] wondered we also need school choice because of what teacher unions are doing on issues such as critical race theory and school […]
[…] wondered we also need school choice because of what teacher unions are doing on issues such as critical race theory and school […]
[…] As I wrote a few days ago, critical race theory can be a helpful way to understand history, but it also can be harmful if it labels everyone as either a victim or an oppressor. […]
[…] I wrote a few days ago, critical race theory can be a helpful way to understand history, but it also can be […]
[…] I wrote a few days ago, critical race theory can be a helpful way to understand history, but it also can be […]
Tucille is wrong. So is Mitchell. State legislators who ban spending government funds to promote CRT in public schools are NOT banning free speech. They are within their legitimate authority to control what public funds are and are not spent on. CRT advocates are free to say whatever they want on their own time.
Also, CRT is not simply a set of ideas. It is a set of practices that include separating white and black children and treating them differently, making white children profess their supposed guilt, and similar exercises. The AG for the State of Montana has already ruled many of these violate existing state and federal law.
CRT is Marxist in origin and intent. So unfortunate that today’s libertarians don’t want to resist Marxists.
[…] Untying the Gordian Knot of Critical Race Theory […]
Sure, schools should be free to offer alternative curricula; however, schools should not be free – especially at taxpayer expense – to teach things that are demonstrably false or demonstrably harmful.
I’m sympathetic to resistance to banning ideas–but the problem is that CRT is actually teaches racism–which, while not illegal per-se, is very likely to lead to discrimination or segregation–i.e. likely to lead to violations of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. I’m opposed to racism, as I assume almost everyone here is.
Abolish government schools.
[…] Source: Untying the Gordian Knot of Critical Race Theory | International Liberty […]
CRT, like sex education, needs to be offered at the appropriate level. Sex education may have a biological time clock but CRT can wait until the student is capable of understanding philosophy and psychology.