In an ad during last year’s campaign, Kamala Harris asserted that “equitable treatment means we all end up at the same place.” In other words, lots of class-warfare taxation to finance lots of means-tested redistribution.
Here’s an oft-used meme illustrating this argument that fairness is only possible with “equality of outcomes.”
I admit this is a clever image, but only in theory.
If you look at the societies that actually have followed Marx’s dictum of “From each according to his ability, to each according to his needs,” you find misery and destitution (nations such as Cuba, North Korea, and Venezuela today, and countries such as Maoist China and the Soviet Union in the past).
Sort of like this modified meme.
But the above meme only tells part of the story.
Because here’s a look at what capitalism actually delivers.
In other words, there may be inequality in capitalism, but only in the sense that some people get richer faster than other people get richer.
If we mixed the final two memes, we would get something akin to the right side of this image, which shows equal misery under socialism and unequal prosperity under capitalism (hat tip to Winston Churchill).
The bottom line is that if we care about the well being of the less fortunate, the policy goal should be free markets and limited government.
Which was the entire point of my three-part series (here, here, and here) on poverty and inequality.
P.S. Here’s a story from Sweden about what happens when the ideology of equality produces bizarre choices.
[…] As captured by my Eighth Theorem of Government, it is far smarter to push policies that are designed to reduce poverty rather than reduce inequality. […]
[…] As captured by my Eighth Theorem of Government, it is far smarter to push policies that are designed to reduce poverty rather than reduce inequality. […]
[…] fourth item is a visual depiction of Winston Churchill’s observation that capitalism is the unequal sharing of the blessings while socialism is the equal sharing of the miseries (other than the ruling […]
[…] an updated look at the oft-used equality-equity […]
[…] an updated look at the oft-used equality-equity […]
[…] Remember, they are motivated by equality of outcomes. […]
[…] is narrowly defined (i.e., equality under the law), or is the question asking us to consider the broader philosophical fight about equality of opportunity vs. equality of […]
[…] Equality, Equity, and Capitalism […]
[…] I even wrote about making that verbal shift back in 2016, though I obviously still frequently use “capitalism” when talking about economic liberty. […]
[…] I even wrote about making that verbal shift back in 2016, though I obviously still frequently use “capitalism” when talking about economic liberty. […]
[…] part of it is presumably the ideological belief in equality of outcomes rather than equality of opportunity, even if the net result is that […]
[…] part of it is presumably the ideological belief in equality of outcomes rather than equality of opportunity, even if the net result is that all […]
[…] Equality, Equity, and Capitalism […]
Capitalism actually puts them in the bleachers.
[…] Equality, Equity, and Capitalism […]
Recently I have seen another version with a fence as the third picture and claims to “systemic oppression”. [1]
A great comment then pointed out how the three are actually outside the stadium, not paying to see the game and the whole thing the picture tries to prove is how to mooch best.
[1] https://www.businessdisabilityinternational.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/equality-vs-equity.jpg