When I write an everything-you-need-to-know column, I’m inevitably guilty of hyperbole.
All that I’m really doing is highlighting a very compelling example of how politicians make a mess of just about anything they touch.
That’s even true in the rare cases when they’re trying to enact policies I prefer.
The crux of the problem is that politicians like having some level of power and control over various sectors of the economy, for the simple public choice-driven reason that they can then extort bribes, campaign cash, and other goodies.
Which is good news for donors, crooks, and cronies, as P.J. O’Rourke wisely noted.
But it’s bad news for those of us who don’t like sleaze. Yet sleaze is almost inevitable when politicians have power to interfere with private market transactions.
Check out these excerpts from a Politico report.
In the past decade, 15 states have legalized a regulated marijuana market for adults over 21, and another 17 have legalized medical marijuana. But in their rush to limit the numbers of licensed vendors and give local municipalities control of where to locate dispensaries, they created something else: A market for local corruption.
Almost all the states that legalized pot either require the approval of local officials – as in Massachusetts — or impose a statewide limit on the number of licenses, chosen by a politically appointed oversight board, or both. These practices effectively put million-dollar decisions in the hands of relatively small-time political figures – the mayors and councilors of small towns and cities, along with the friends and supporters of politicians who appoint them to boards. …They have also created a culture in which would-be cannabis entrepreneurs feel obliged to make large campaign contributions or hire politically connected lobbyists. …It’s not just local officials. Allegations of corruption have reached the state level in numerous marijuana programs, especially ones in which a small group of commissioners are charged with dispensing limited numbers of licenses.
Needless to say, what’s happening in the marijuana industry happens wherever and whenever politicians have power.
“All government contracting and licensing is subject to these kinds of forces,” said Douglas Berman, a law professor at Ohio State University who authors a blog on marijuana policy. …“There’s a lot of deal-making between businesses and localities that creates the environment of everyone working their way towards getting a piece of the action,” Berman said. Whether it’s city or county officials that need to be appeased, local control is “just another opportunity for another set of hands to be outstretched.”
The report concludes by noting that corruption can be avoided very simply. Just make sure politicians and other people in government have no power or authority.
States that have largely avoided corruption controversies either do not have license caps — like Colorado or Oklahoma — or dole out a limited number of licenses through a lottery rather than scoring the applicants by merit — like Arizona. Many entrepreneurs, particularly those who lost out on license applications, believe the government shouldn’t be in the business of picking winners and losers and should just let the free market do its job.
Amen.
I’ll conclude by noting that politicians are doing the right thing in the worst way.
I want to end the War on Drugs because it is a costly failure. It’s not that I think drug use is a good idea. But I recognize that the social harm of prohibition is greater than the social harm of legalization.
And, as a libertarian, I believe people should be free to make their own decisions (consistent with the libertarian non-aggression principle, of course), even if I happen to disapprove.
Sadly, politicians are not legalizing pot for libertarian reasons.
Instead, they see it as a way of having a new product to tax (and they’re botching that). And, as illustrated by today’s story, they see it as a way of lining their own pockets.
I’m almost tempted to say we’d be better off if marijuana was criminalized so it could be sold on the black market instead.
But the real moral of the story is that government power is a recipe corruption.
[…] we also need to pay attention to the politicians who are so addicted to tax revenue that they are enabling black markets to […]
[…] energy policy, industrial policy, agricultural policy, foreign policy, health policy, trade policy, drug policy, and bailout policy. Or anything else involving politicians and their […]
We have had more than enough time since the legalization of weed in certain states to have actual studies of actual results. We were told by all the pro-druyg legalization people that if we legalized drugs, the price would go down, the crime would go down, usage wouldn’t change, etc., etc.
Well, the time has passed, and I DEMAND TO SEE THE RESULTS.
I’m as libertarian as they come, I couldn’t care less who destroys his life, as long as it doesn’t affect mine. But part and parcel to that agreement is some reflection on the actual result, not simply an acceptance of a premise.
If the only difference is that government is making the $$$, not private individuals, I’m not so sure I will buy in.
Show me the money! And the results!
[…] I’ve even recycled the title that I used just two days ago because the WSJ column is such a powerful […]
[…] A great example of how government has the uncanny ability to complicate anything it touches can be seen in the booming cannabis industry in those states that have legalized marijuana in various forms. As Daniel Mitchell explains, it’s everything you need to know about government in one story. […]
The War on Drugs is lucrative for the producers and transporters of illegal drugs. Not only them but also for the other side: the law enforcement, court systems and prisons. How many of those state employees would have to find other work if drugs were legalized?
Reblogged this on boudica.us.
[…] Everything You Want to Know about Government in a Single Story […]
Reblogged this on Gds44's Blog.
Mr. Mitchell,
And as you probably know, PA’s medial marijuana law is nothing but an avenue for state government to get a cut of the drug action. Unlike pharmacy regulated drugs, persons who have a “prescription” for medical marijuana are not limited on refills. Makes it easy for low levels drug dealers to continue peddling weed. It is illegal to resell of course, but I have first hand knowledge of that from someone I know who works at one of these places.
Kevin Susquehanna County, PA
Sent from my Behemoth Dell 690