In a new documentary film, Race to the Bottom, I had an opportunity to pontificate briefly about corporate tax and the Laffer Curve.
At the risk of understatement, I represented a minority viewpoint in the documentary. Most of the people interviewed had a negative view of tax competition, considering it to be (as suggested by the title) a “race to the bottom.”
By contrast, I view tax competition as a way of constraining the “stationary bandit” so that we don’t wind up with “goldfish government.”
For purposes of today’s column, though, I want to focus on the narrower issue of the relationship between corporate tax rates and corporate tax revenue.
In the above video, I asserted that lower rates did not result in lower revenue. Indeed, I even made the bold statement that revenues increased.
Fortunately, I don’t need to do any elaborate calculations to prove my point. I’ll simply direct readers to the work of two left-leaning international bureaucracies.
Back in 2017, I cited an article form the International Monetary Fund that included a graph clearly illustrating that the drop in tax rates has not been accompanied by a drop in tax revenue.
This was a remarkable admission considering that the article argued in favor of higher tax burdens.
Likewise, last year I cited a study from the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development that also acknowledged that falling tax rates on companies did not translate into lower revenues.
Given that the OECD has a big project to increase business tax burdens, that also was a startling admission.
None of this means, by the way, that lower rates always lead to more revenue.
Indeed, most tax cuts cause revenue to decline (though not as much as predicted by static estimates).
The bottom line is that lower tax rates are good for economic performance and my friends on the left shouldn’t get too worried about disappearing tax revenue.
P.S. There’s also some 2017 OECD data and 2018 OECD data about business tax rates and business tax revenues.
P.P.S. Earlier this year, I cited OECD data that also included personal income tax rates and tax revenue.
[…] other words, a higher rate would not lead to a big increase in revenue. Indeed, it might do so much damage to the business climate that […]
[…] Lower corporate rates generate revenue feedback […]
[…] Lower corporate rates generate revenue feedback […]
[…] Lower corporate rates generate revenue feedback […]
[…] Lower corporate rates generate revenue feedback […]
[…] Corporate Taxes and the Laffer Curve […]
[…] the corporate rate is theoretically the biggest revenue raiser in Biden’s tax plan, I will safely predict that it won’t raise nearly as much revenue as projected by static revenue estimates. I […]
[…] The corporate tax cartel will lead to higher tax rates, but OECD and IMF data (and U.S. data) show that this doesn’t necessarily mean higher […]
[…] Corporate Taxes and the Laffer Curve […]
[…] Corporate Taxes and the Laffer Curve […]
[…] Corporate Taxes and the Laffer Curve […]
[…] Corporate Taxes and the Laffer Curve […]
[…] answer to the first question almost certainly is “yes” but “don’t exaggerate” is probably the prudent response to the second […]
[…] answer to the first question almost certainly is “yes” but “don’t exaggerate” is probably the prudent response to […]
[…] the corporate rate is theoretically the biggest revenue raiser in Biden’s tax plan, I will safely predict that it won’t raise nearly as much revenue as projected by static revenue estimates. I […]
[…] For more information on corporate tax rates and corporate tax revenue, click here, here, here, and […]
[…] the corporate rate is theoretically the biggest revenue raiser in Biden’s tax plan, I will safely predict that it won’t raise nearly as much revenue as projected by static revenue estimates. I […]
[…] Lower corporate tax rates can generate substantial revenue feedback. […]
[…] the corporate rate is theoretically the biggest revenue raiser in Biden’s tax plan, I will safely predict that it won’t raise nearly as much revenue as projected by static revenue estimates. I […]
[…] The economic damage of higher corporate tax rates means that there is less taxable income (i.e., we need to remember the Laffer Curve). […]
[…] the corporate rate is theoretically the biggest revenue raiser in Biden’s tax plan, I will safely predict that it won’t raise nearly as much revenue as projected by static revenue estimates. I […]
[…] the corporate rate is theoretically the biggest revenue raiser in Biden’s tax plan, I will safely predict that it won’t raise nearly as much revenue as projected by static revenue estimates. I […]
[…] the corporate rate is theoretically the biggest revenue raiser in Biden’s tax plan, I will safely predict that it won’t raise nearly as much revenue as projected by static revenue estimates. I […]
[…] The economic damage of higher corporate tax rates means that there is less taxable income (i.e., we need to remember the Laffer Curve). […]
[…] The economic damage of higher corporate tax rates means that there is less taxable income (i.e., we need to remember the Laffer Curve). […]
[…] the corporate rate is theoretically the biggest revenue raiser in Biden’s tax plan, I will safely predict that it won’t raise nearly as much revenue as projected by static revenue estimates. I […]
[…] in the corporate rate is theoretically the biggest revenue raiser in Biden’s tax plan, I will safely predict that it won’t raise nearly as much revenue as projected by static revenue estimates. I […]
[…] in the corporate rate is theoretically the biggest revenue raiser in Biden’s tax plan, I will safely predict that it won’t raise nearly as much revenue as projected by static revenue estimates. I […]
[…] have a couple of cameos in a new left-leaning documentary film, Race to the Bottom. I shared a clip two day ago with my views on corporate tax and the Laffer […]
[…] have a couple of cameos in a new left-leaning documentary film, Race to the Bottom. I shared a clip two day ago with my views on corporate tax and the Laffer […]
[…] have a couple of cameos in a new left-leaning documentary film, Race to the Bottom. I shared a clip two day ago with my views on corporate tax and the Laffer […]
[…] have a couple of cameos in a new left-leaning documentary film, Race to the Bottom. I shared a clip two day ago with my views on corporate tax and the Laffer […]
[…] have a couple of cameos in a new left-leaning documentary film, Race to the Bottom. I shared a clip two day ago with my views on corporate tax and the Laffer […]
Dan Bongino always says you aren’t debating the person in front of you but the one standing to the side listening to the arguments.
Since the only economic entity that can pay a tax is the end consumer, discussing the Laffer Curve and corporate taxes is meaningless at best. Corporate taxes should always be zero.
The only “fair tax” is a consumption tax which the end consumer pays when they purchase a product or service. Therefore, all other payroll taxes and deductions should be zero and the individual should use their money as they see fit.
Any other tax is the government picking winners and losers, which should never be allowed.
That’s how you start from a libertarian position. Then your opponent has to prove that anything greater than zero is fair, equitable and does not benefit any economic entity to the detriment of another.
Please remember that the Laffer Curve has an inflection point. The practical implication is that is you raise tax rates and revenue declines, tax rates were too high in the first place already.
As I always say: No taxation without services rendered!
[…] Corporate Taxes and the Laffer Curve […]
With all due respect, I think you do yourself a disservice by agreeing to act as the minority defense in leftist docu-ganda. This always backfires, in my opinion. By subtle means, they always manage to turn the contrarian argument into a weak and somehow inhumane position, which ends up supporting their case.
Reblogged this on The Palm Beach Examiner.