Last week, I participated in a webinar with IES Europe. The program covered a wide range of issues, including tax competition, Social Security reform, and the recipe for national prosperity.
Here’s what I said on the topic of federalism.
To add some hard data to the discussion, let’s compare the degree of fiscal decentralization in the United States in both 1902 and 2019, based on numbers from the Census Bureau (click on Govt_Finances) and the Office of Management and Budget (click on Table 14.3).
As you can see from the chart, Washington now accounts for a much bigger share of overall government spending.
By the way, these numbers should not be misinterpreted.
There’s been no reduction in the burden of state and local government outlays. Indeed, there’s been a steady increase in such spending, even after adjusting for inflation.
But the federal government has grown far more rapidly.
Indeed, the fiscal history of the United States is a sad story about the loss of almost all constraints and limits that America’s Founders put in the Constitution in hopes of controlling the size and scope of Washington.
The bottom line is we now have much bigger government and it’s more remote because of centralization.
I mentioned Switzerland in the latter part of my answer.
Here’s the data comparing Switzerland and the United States. As you can see, Switzerland has been more successful in retaining genuine federalism.
Indeed, the two countries are mirror images, with nearly 2/3rds of government spending in the U.S. coming from Washington and nearly 2/3rds of government in Switzerland taking place a the level of cantons and municipalities.
P.S. Here’s what scholars from the Austrian School have said about federalism.
P.P.S. Here’s my two cents on federalism in the context of issues such as welfare, natural disasters, transportation, coronavirus, infrastructure, and Medicaid,
P.P.P.S. Because there’s strong evidence that decentralization produces better outcomes, I’m even willing to accept bad examples of federalism.
[…] illustrated by this chart, Switzerland has done a much better job than the United States at preserving federalism, but there […]
[…] illustrated by this chart, Switzerland has done a much better job than the United States at preserving federalism, but there […]
[…] That type of federalism still exists in Switzerland, but unfortunately is eroding in the United States. […]
[…] That type of federalism still exists in Switzerland, but unfortunately is eroding in the United States. […]
[…] make tax reform part of their campaigns. Combined with other good ideas such as spending caps and federalism, there might be a winning message for the right […]
[…] make tax reform part of their campaigns. Combined with other good ideas such as spending caps and federalism, there might be a winning message for the right […]
[…] federalism has declined in the United States and we are getting worse results. But perhaps a restoration […]
[…] federalism has declined in the United States and we are getting worse results. But perhaps a restoration […]
[…] federalism has declined in the United States and we are getting worse results. But perhaps a restoration campaign would be […]
[…] specifically, most fiscal policy (both taxes and spending) takes place at the cantonal and municipal level. And this means that the Swiss can vote with their feet if they want more government or less […]
[…] Sadly, federalism has declined in the United […]
[…] Sadly, federalism has declined in the United […]
[…] is the gold standard for federalism. Unlike the United States, the Swiss have resisted centralization. Most spending and taxation still occurs at the […]
[…] is the gold standard for federalism. Unlike the United States, the Swiss have resisted centralization. Most spending and taxation still occurs at the […]
[…] mentions policies that I find very appealing, such as the country’s strong federalist system (unlike the United States, federalism hasn’t […]
[…] mentions policies that I find very appealing, such as the country’s strong federalist system (unlike the United States, federalism hasn’t […]
[…] bad news is that federalism has declined in the United States as politicians in Washington have expanded the size and scope of the national […]
[…] bad news is that federalism has declined in the United States as politicians in Washington have expanded the size and scope of the national […]
[…] P.S. Switzerland is a great example of genuine federalism, whereas our system in the United States has been substantially eroded. […]
[…] P.S. Switzerland is a great example of genuine federalism, whereas our system in the United States has been substantially eroded. […]
[…] was a big fan of federalism (to the extent it still exists) before any of us ever heard of the […]
[…] we’re moving in the wrong direction in the United States, with Washington playing an ever-greater role in things that should be […]
[…] we’re moving in the wrong direction in the United States, with Washington playing an ever-greater role in things that should be handled […]
[…] it’s also a sad result since the United States has moved in the wrong direction in recent […]
[…] As part of my presentation earlier this month to IES Europe, I discussed topics such as comparative economics and federalism. […]
[…] most libertarians, I support decentralization and federalism. Under the right circumstances, I’m even sympathetic to the idea of secession (hooray for […]
[…] indicated by one of my columns last week, I’m a big believer in […]
I’m glad you noted that the central government is called “federal”, and that’s confusing. You are, in a sense, making an anti-Federalist argument! Jefferson et al. foretold that we’d be in this mess.
Getting kind of depressing reading here every day. It seems like a narration of the United States’ steady decline into fiscal hell.
The only way to stop the growth of the central (not “federal”) government is as Dan Mitchell suggested. Eliminate or transfer federal agencies and programs to the states.